Seems pretty simple, you vote yes if you are in favor of disenfranchising voters and damaging political parties. You vote no if you think democracy and the 1st Amendment right of free association actually means something.
If you think this is a good idea, propose to people being paid full time to advocate for these changes that we adopt the alternative blanket primary system where voters can select any candidate but only the top two vote getters from the top two differing political parties advance to the general. They generally have a fit. All of their concern about voter choice and election economy comes to a grinding halt.
These initiatives are about not only depriving political parties of selecting their candidates, but also about systematically controlling debate. These initiatives are less about reducing partisan behavior and more about party supermajorities stifling debate.
If you favor this, then you favor OSU fans voting on the TU starting lineup each year.
