ADVERTISEMENT

Mass Deportation and Tariff Wars.... What's our endgame?

we did it in the 40s and 50, without them, and if they didn't make enough at one job, they worked a second
How amusing that you are ignorant about a sizable increase in immigration in the 40's and 50's mainly to harvest our crops. That's when we first started bringing in Mexicans to be our brute labor force. Go on making false statements, why change from your norm.

Open primaries

The one problem with any type of open primary is when members of party “A” vote in party “B”s primary for the most extreme candidate knowing the candidate they actually support has a better chance of beating the extreme candidate. I actually believe this manipulation would be more difficult under the type of primary being proposed here.
Except they voted in the most extreme candidate in the primary, and he won the election. I'm sure feel Kamala is extreme, but looking at the nominations for cabinet, I argue that is proof that Trump wins out on extreme. That's why it is good that you have to choose whether to vote for extreme in the opposite party, or your pick for preferred candidate in your party.

Yooler official game thread

We have a lot of games left. This is a bad loss. We can overcome it though if we pull our head out of our ass

One geme does not a season unmake or make. Love how up and down our fans are. Very few exceptions on the up and down. We could come and make up for this loss, and play totally differently after a few games with Garcia back, or not. Nobody knows, no matter how doom and gloom you want to be.

Open primaries

The one problem with any type of open primary is when members of party “A” vote in party “B”s primary for the most extreme candidate knowing the candidate they actually support has a better chance of beating the extreme candidate. I actually believe this manipulation would be more difficult under the type of primary being proposed here.
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW

Open primaries

I don't see how this disenfranchises anyone. That means taking away the right to vote. Nobody's voting rights are taken away.

The terms "Republican party" and "Democratic party" are nowhere to be found in our constitution either. There is no constitutional recognition of a two-party system. There is also no restriction whatsoever of people gathering and taking collective political action. They would be free to advocate for a particular candidate as a party.

Since I have been 18 I never understood why people could get all tied up in political parties or party politics. Never voted for anyone based on a party. This system seems eminently fair.
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT