ADVERTISEMENT

Pray For Israel 🇮🇱 🙏

To those that laugh at (or write) the posts saying I’m crazy for calling executive tier democrats racist, I have one simple reauest: Please, if you know, explain to me why MLK preferred to focus so much on “content of character” & not on group x (described often as “the oppressed”.)

Since I know you don’t fully understand, I included a hint right there in the answer (“group x.”)

My fault, I know that requires critical thinking. And no, I’m not suggesting all of you are incapable of thinking critically (many are,) I’m saying even those who are will go out of their way to make sure they’re never caught doing this, at least not in public by the Democrat party.

He focused on content of character because he knew the importance of everyone’s inherent value as individuals. Sometimes the Dems say something about everyone, but they will never qualify their broad statements about oppressed groups with “not all.” This is indicative of their preference to groupthink over critical thinking skills of individuals.

MLK knew that if you were to attack an entire group, ie go after the whites all of them, then he’d be no different the ones who were against him. Similarly today, you cannot describe an airliner as being of “integrity” by saying “well, they’re hiring more black pilots & historically that’s been a problem for these airliners.” This ignores all other possible explanations (I know many black people who not only never have flown in a plane but vow to never step foot on one & this is just one of the many correlating variables) & focuses on the immutable.

If you say “I know they’re not racist, they hire black people,” it’s no different than someone in 1960 “they hire white people so they can’t be racist.” Before you dispute this or explain how it doesn’t make sense, I’m not misspeaking nor misunderstanding history, I’m telling you there is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE between the 2!
If the democrats’ assertion that DEI isn’t illegal (“you can’t be racist toward or discriminate against white/asian people” they say) were true, they wouldn’t be saying “when the conservatives say this they mean the N word.”
 
What is Israel's end game here? How do they intend to get to where they want to be? I haven't heard of any plan from Bibi about a post-Hamas government. I think he likes the chaos because it gives him purpose and keeps him in power.

Now, they are starting to kill more Hezbollah dudes. How far does the bombing go there? It just seems like they don't have a plan here.
 
I assume Israel just wants Iran to stop using its proxies to bomb them.

I also assume Bibi doesn’t mind the conflict. Provides an ongoing threat and solidifies his power base. After the Oct attack Hamas had to be eliminated if you’re head of Israel. I also assume of non-terrorist based governance likely installed by Israel would be the goal.
 
I assume Israel just wants Iran to stop using its proxies to bomb them.

I also assume Bibi doesn’t mind the conflict. Provides an ongoing threat and solidifies his power base. After the Oct attack Hamas had to be eliminated if you’re head of Israel. I also assume of non-terrorist based governance likely installed by Israel would be the goal.
Temporarily keeps the courts and the people off his back. He will likely not get Hamas or a some new organization to be stopped. The last time they tried to get the PLO shut down, they got Hamas. Different time, same story. He knows that, but is moving forward with self protecting actions. That gets him next to zero, with replacing Hamas with a non-terrorist organization, but that is probably not his real goal.
 
Temporarily keeps the courts and the people off his back. He will likely not get Hamas or a some new organization to be stopped. The last time they tried to get the PLO shut down, they got Hamas. Different time, same story. He knows that, but is moving forward with self protecting actions. That gets him next to zero, with replacing Hamas with a non-terrorist organization, but that is probably not his real goal.
I would expect Israeli forces to occupy that area for a very long time.
 
Massive missile attack from Iran currently underway. There also appears to be a terrorist attack on the ground in Tel Aviv. Assume the Israeli response will depend on what was targeted and hit. Buckle up

 
This is a conflict between Iran and Israel, plain and simple.

If not for Iran there would be a broader settlement between Israel and the Arabs.

If not for Iran, there would be no Hezbollah. Assad would have fallen in Syria.

Iran is the worst. Israel demeans the Palestinians who are largely stateless people and creates facts on the ground to lay claim to others' land.

But Iran gives them excuses for doing those things. Iran is the worst actor in the region.

I say this as someone who has family just a couple of miles from where Israel dropped their bunker busters to kill Nasrallah last week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW
Looks like we leaked Israel’s detailed plan on retaliation against Iran. Wow.

Well Israel/Netanyahoo didn't really give us much of a chance. with his decisions that seem to be as much about personal career protection as they are about things in the interest of Israel as a whole.

Our providing him with tons of ammo and military support(missile launchers, etc) for protection of Israel, didn't seem to get him to listen to our advice, as he ignored most of it. I wonder if it was leaked with high level clearance or if it was even from our country, instead of from a possibly cooperating ally.
 
Well Israel/Netanyahoo didn't really give us much of a chance. with his decisions that seem to be as much about personal career protection as they are about things in the interest of Israel as a whole.

Our providing him with tons of ammo and military support(missile launchers, etc) for protection of Israel, didn't seem to get him to listen to our advice, as he ignored most of it. I wonder if it was leaked with high level clearance or if it was even from our country, instead of from a possibly cooperating ally.
Protecting the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism would be a very bad look if it were the U.S. who in fact leaked the plans .
 
Last edited:
We are a clownshow. Did I mention she was accused of spying for Iran a year ago but kept not only her security clearance but access to the plans for military action against Iran.

 
We are a clownshow. Did I mention she was accused of spying for Iran a year ago but kept not only her security clearance but access to the plans for military action against Iran.

I'm sure we'd be interested to hear her father's thoughts on the issue, so as to the fact that he teaches Philosophy at the University of Tehran.
 
We are a clownshow. Did I mention she was accused of spying for Iran a year ago but kept not only her security clearance but access to the plans for military action against Iran.

No offense, Israel has not been a very good ally as of late. I honestly could care less about this entire situation. Both sides can take a flying leap for all I care.

And as far as American hostages go, my advice is: don't go party in a warzone without thinking you might be taking your life into your own hands. I don't suggest we hold any raves in Kharkiv either.
 
No offense, Israel has not been a very good ally as of late. I honestly could care less about this entire situation. Both sides can take a flying leap for all I care.

And as far as American hostages go, my advice is: don't go party in a warzone without thinking you might be taking your life into your own hands. I don't suggest we hold any raves in Kharkiv either.
Sounds like your attitude is prevalent in our intelligence agencies. The obvious problem is if we’re giving Iranian Americans who have been accused of spying for Iran access to top secret attack plans against Iran then what other idiotic decisions are being made by our intelligence agencies. How many Americans are dying as a result. It’s one of the biggest clown shows I’ve ever seen.

You can blame those hostages if you wish. That doesn’t absolve our obligation not to further place them in harms way. We’ve seen how bad the Secret Service has become. The incompetence appears to be widespread. Whoever wins this election in two weeks, my hope is they conduct a house cleaning of these agencies.
 
Sounds like your attitude is prevalent in our intelligence agencies. The obvious problem is if we’re giving Iranian Americans who have been accused of spying for Iran access to top secret attack plans against Iran then what other idiotic decisions are being made by our intelligence agencies. How many Americans are dying as a result. It’s one of the biggest clown shows I’ve ever seen.

You can blame those hostages if you wish. That doesn’t absolve our obligation not to further place them in harms way. We’ve seen how bad the Secret Service has become. The incompetence appears to be widespread. Whoever wins this election in two weeks, my hope is they conduct a house cleaning of these agencies.
One traitor does not mean the entire agency necessarily needs a house cleaning. Certainly a review.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW
Sounds like your attitude is prevalent in our intelligence agencies. The obvious problem is if we’re giving Iranian Americans who have been accused of spying for Iran access to top secret attack plans against Iran then what other idiotic decisions are being made by our intelligence agencies. How many Americans are dying as a result. It’s one of the biggest clown shows I’ve ever seen.

You can blame those hostages if you wish. That doesn’t absolve our obligation not to further place them in harms way. We’ve seen how bad the Secret Service has become. The incompetence appears to be widespread. Whoever wins this election in two weeks, my hope is they conduct a house cleaning of these agencies.
Trump loves a constituency like you as a president, that uses those desires to change out as much of Washington as he can. There are some hardcore reviews that need to be done, but no wholesale changes that need to be enacted. Pick out the bad apples, and things will run smoothly in all of the agencies and bureaus.
 
Trump loves a constituency like you as a president, that uses those desires to change out as much of Washington as he can. There are some hardcore reviews that need to be done, but no wholesale changes that need to be enacted. Pick out the bad apples, and things will run smoothly in all of the agencies and bureaus.
The problem isn’t a traitor. The problem is an agency who allows someone suspected of spying for Iran to receive top secret battle plans involving that very country. This isn’t one or two people. It’s multiple people within the agency who believed she should still have access to top secret information such as this. As I said above, I would hope whoever is elected will look at the intelligence agencies from top to bottom and reevaluate decision making and policies. The same thing which was recommended for the Secret Service. Both have zero to do with Trump.
 
The problem isn’t a traitor. The problem is an agency who allows someone suspected of spying for Iran to receive top secret battle plans involving that very country. This isn’t one or two people. It’s multiple people within the agency who believed she should still have access to top secret information such as this. As I said above, I would hope whoever is elected will look at the intelligence agencies from top to bottom and reevaluate decision making and policies. The same thing which was recommended for the Secret Service. Both have zero to do with Trump.
When I said bad apples, I wasn't referring to just spies. I was referring to wide swaths of upper management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lawpoke87
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT