Well, you still have to jump and go get the ball, otherwise someone who wants it more will go and get it.
Any idea what he was so mad about? We could see him screaming at the refs on the stream but no idea what it was about.
That's my point. Igbanu and Jeffries are consistently smaller than the guys they're guarding. It is easier for the taller players to go over those 2 without fouling. Positioning is important, but in order to eliminate someone reaching over or just getting higher than your hands, you do need to jump and try and high point the ball.Incorrect, please see Charles Barkley or David Shelton. Rebounding is, has, and always will be position.
This is why Joiner consitantly rebounds, he is excellent at position vs his man and understands where a ball is going to end up on shots.
Unless you can jump over me, placing my body between you and the ball is all that is necessary to get rebounds.
That's my point. Igbanu and Jeffries are consistently smaller than the guys they're guarding. It is easier for the taller players to go over those 2 without fouling. Positioning is important, but in order to eliminate someone reaching over or just getting higher than your hands, you do need to jump and try and high point the ball.
Barkley, IMO, is the greatest rebounder in the history of the game. A lot of his was a desire to not let anyone else ever get a rebound over him.
Their coaches just got into a shouting match with Haith. Anyone know what happened?
Rebounding on 26 of 42 threes creates a lot of long rebounds but, there times we simply weren’t in position or not fighting for them.
Haith should have junked the zone when he realized Cal Baptist wanted to play a game of HORSE.
Joiner would be my POG, played a great second half.
Where was Scott? Moore? Horne?
Haith agreed with me, this will be a good teaching game. Lot's of lessons can be learned watching the tape on this game. I hope you continue to be right on the lineups. Will be happy with him on his sub patterns for the first time if Haith does continue the trend with those 4 guys.Scott played a ton of minutes but didn't get the ball on offense as much as he did in the first two games. He was playing nice defense late in the 2nd half.
Moore played for 4 or 5 min in the first half and then never came back in, no idea why.
Horne was out there but kept taking, in my opinion, ill-advised jumpers at the high post. He sat quite a bit after the 4th or 5th time he did that, he also was struggling on help defense so I suspect that's a major reason he sat.
But most importantly Haith let the hot hands play the most in the game today. First time this season we saw Taplin, Joiner, Jeffries, and Igbanu on the court together. I suspect we continue to see a line-up with those 4 more and more frequently as the season progresses.
They had a couple good D1 transfers.Whew!
Hopefully the guys learned the lesson that you can never just phone it in and expect to win. They did come up with just enough down the stretch to pull it off.
Cal Bap was definitely the best of the three opponents to date.
The bottom line is we're 3-0.
I think everyone here should think twice on the talking crap we did on ORU.
They only made around 30%. They shot a high volume, but they honestly didn't make many more than they would normally have given the sample size. We just let them shoot a ton of them. 30% from 3 isn't really a fluke.We would smoke cal baptist most days, but today was the day they made all those threes. They had two guys off the bench combine for 7 threes and 31 points...and against oru they had a combined 0 threes.
Fluke.
Anyone who saw the game, did it look like a traditional noon tip hangover for us? Igbanu and Jeffries showed up to play, but we seemed to not have many others show up for the entire game. These are the games that Taplin needs to take over. In following along, it just seemed like he was pretty passive.
Joiner balled out too it seems.
My question would be: Where was Scott? Moore? Horne?
I think everyone here should think twice on the talking crap we did on ORU.
This is a loss the past few years.
That we managed to avoid dropping it is a huge sign this year may turn out well.
I’m not sure why you expected them to be smaller and slower. Their bigs went 6’11”, 6’10”, and 6’8” and all those threes meant a lot of long rebounds. Could we have rebounded better? Absolutely! However, I don’t think the numbers from this game are necessarily an indicator of future performance.Seems the problem was less that they shot great (they didn’t, they’d have smoked us if they had shot decently) and more that they killed us on the boards. They out rebounded us by 8 even though we took 16 fewer shots than them. It’s pretty scary that a team that I’d expect to be smaller, slower and generally less athletic than us owned the boards. We got very lucky they had such a bad shooting game.
Well I guess I hoped we’d be more athletic than a first year D1 school in the WAC. Hopefully it was an aberration as you say. Ironically after years past, we won because they fouled a zillion times and we hit the free throws. Without all those foul shots, given our regular shooting, we would have lost. I suspect that might be part of what their coach was so upset about.I’m not sure why you expected them to be smaller and slower. Their bigs went 6’11”, 6’10”, and 6’8” and all those threes meant a lot of long rebounds. Could we have rebounded better? Absolutely! However, I don’t think the numbers from this game are necessarily an indicator of future performance.