then I will never have to make another decision for myself; Kamala, the Dems, and the government will tell me what I need.#1
#1 pollster in the country. Even if she’s offer 3-4 points (never has been) Harris still wins easily.
then I will never have to make another decision for myself; Kamala, the Dems, and the government will tell me what I need.#1
#1 pollster in the country. Even if she’s offer 3-4 points (never has been) Harris still wins easily.
If this actually happens it will have been driven by women who Trump and his party's policies have managed to alienate at every turn.#1
#1 pollster in the country. Even if she’s offer 3-4 points (never has been) Harris still wins easily.
Agree to a degree.Participating in activities like choir, drama, debate, etc.. aren’t expensive. Wasn’t really the focus of my post though. My thoughts were more directed toward parental involvement in the academics of their kids.
I have a high school kid in drama and choir. I think I would know the costs. But ok.Agree to a degree.
Are you extrapolating the Iowa poll showing Harris leading Trump in that state as an indicator of the national election? She very well may win, and big, but there are so many nuances in the swing states that would cause me pause on what may happen. Hopefully we will have a peaceful election and transition no matter who wins.Selzer has Harris +3. She will be the next President of the U.S.
Yes. If Harris is up 3 in Iowa she will win states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. I also like her chances in North Carolina.Are you extrapolating the Iowa poll showing Harris leading Trump in that state as an indicator of the national election? She very well may win, and big, but there are so many nuances in the swing states that would cause me pause on what may happen. Hopefully we will have a peaceful election and transition no matter who wins.
I think she will win NC because of the gubernatorial race influencing the presidential election. I have no idea about the other states. I just think the dynamics in this election are different than those in the past. We will know on Tuesday night, Wednesday or sometime before the inauguration 😁Yes. If Harris is up 3 in Iowa she will win states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. I also like her chances in North Carolina.
Didn't mean that they were pricey, I meant that they require time commitments. It can be hard to participate in some of that when you aren't able to get home because mom or dad are working two jobs. Ask me how I know.I have a high school kid in drama and choir. I think I would know the costs. But ok.
You are looking at public polling. Where pollsters have a greater incentive to not be wrong than they do to be right. It skews results. Internal polling has the incentive to be right so the client comes back. It’s closer in Wisconsin than people on the left want to talk about. Trump was up six in Iowa and would have lost Wisconsin if Clinton had a cup of coffee there. Though early voting is showing a wider gender gap in Wisconsin than predicted, which favors Harris, she’s taken a bath on high school diploma males in blue collar jobs. If those men vote on Election Day in even just slightly above predicted numbers she will lose it.Yes. If Harris is up 3 in Iowa she will win states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. I also like her chances in North Carolina.
Yeah, even if it is a wonky bad sample (which can happen even to Selzer), it is a very bad omen for Trump. If it is even close there it is bad news for him. And it would be shocking if Selzer is off by more than 8 points and Trump wins Iowa by 5+.Yes. If Harris is up 3 in Iowa she will win states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. I also like her chances in North Carolina.
Selzer has a long history of extremely accurate polling in Iowa. I find it hard to believe she would jeopardize her reputation with an intentional wrong poll. However if she’s off by more than 2-3 points I firmly believe based on her history it’s deliberate. We shall see.Yeah, even if it is a wonky bad sample (which can happen even to Selzer), it is a very bad omen for Trump. If it is even close there it is bad news for him. And it would be shocking if Selzer is off by more than 8 points and Trump wins Iowa by 5+.
She said she saw significant movement from older women voting in large numbers for Harris.
Her forecast is based heavily on unexpectedly high early voter turnout for Harris amongst Protestant and non religious women in her own demographic in the populated areas of Iowa. I’m not sure if that translates over to how voters behave in the Catholic working class areas of the Pittsburgh suburbs and Pennslytucky rural areas. We shall see if there’s confirmation bias in her methods soon enough.Selzer has a long history of extremely accurate polling in Iowa. I find it hard to believe she would jeopardize her reputation with an intentional wrong poll. However if she’s off by more than 2-3 points I firmly believe based on her history it’s deliberate. We shall see.
One person one vote, right?Then again, this all may get decided by a one vote Dem majority in the House. Will be awkward with Vance as Vice President.
mine is only about 87%. I live in AZ where legals register and vote.One person one vote, right?
Okay. Have fun in jail.I decided to vote like a Democrat.
I voted early, . . . and often
You really are that dumb, eh?Okay. Have fun in jail.
Truly hope you aren't serious about that.
You never know with aTUfan.You really are that dumb, eh?
Everyone can take that poll with a grain of salt...but when you look at the track record and history of that poll in Iowa, they have not been off by more than +/- 1 pt in either direction of the actual vote except for once in the last 6 elections I believe.Yes. If Harris is up 3 in Iowa she will win states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. I also like her chances in North Carolina.
I don't get to vote in the Tulsa mayoral election because I live in BA but I suspect you're correct. The Van Norman voters will predictably vote for Karen Keith for the obvious reasons they voted for the old white guy in the 1st place. The only thing that saves Monroe Nichols is a larger than expected voter turnout from midtown and north Tulsa, which could happen because of the presidential raceBonus pick….Keith wins mayoral race by 5 points. Zero data here just a gut feeling.
I can’t vote in the mayoral race either. Drove past a couple of polling places on my way to work this morning and I’ve never seen lines to vote like this. I think Keith gets the independent and Pub vote and it’s enough to carry her across the finish line. Nichols made a mistake taking assistance from the Dem party and blocking Keith from the same. That will hurt him with independents.I don't get to vote in the Tulsa mayoral election because I live in BA but I suspect you're correct. The Van Norman voters will predictably vote for Karen Keith for the obvious reasons they voted for the old white guy in the 1st place. The only thing that saves Monroe Nichols is a larger than expected voter turnout from midtown and north Tulsa, which could happen because of the presidential race
Old folks vote most and know her. Hard to have a negative view of Karen Keith. She is very bland.I can’t vote in the mayoral race either. Drove past a couple of polling places on my way to work this morning and I’ve never seen lines to vote like this. I think Keith gets the independent and Pub vote and it’s enough to carry her across the finish line. Nichols made a mistake taking assistance from the Dem party and blocking Keith from the same. That will hurt him with independents.
Only the Pubs with an army of lawyers huh. I know I shouldn’t be but I’m still surprised to see intelligent people completely blind to seeing both sidesEveryone can take that poll with a grain of salt...but when you look at the track record and history of that poll in Iowa, they have not been off by more than +/- 1 pt in either direction of the actual vote except for once in the last 6 elections I believe.
It won't matter though...Trump can lose some of those swing states by 75k votes and he'll still have an army of lawyers contesting the results saying absentee ballots shouldn't be counted, voters he will argue are ineligible should have been purged, etc. He has already hinted that he and Mike Johnson have a handshake deal to derail the Congressional certification of electoral votes and I'd be willing to bet there will be another Jan. 6th (on whatever appropriate date) incident except this time it will be a lot of MAGA blood spilled because the national guard will be there and ready and basically daring the mob to FAFO. (Philadelphia's DA has already told the "militia" in that county to tread lightly with their presence at polling places because he is making sure they know if the FA they will FO).
Monroe is fighting some headwinds imo. I expect a fairly conservative electorate in Tulsa. Wish he would have tried to appeal more to the center instead of cozying up to the local Dem party. I think he’s going to need this independent votes. Would be happy to be wrong here.Old folks vote most and know her. Hard to have a negative view of Karen Keith. She is very bland.
I am voting for Monroe. Not a single Keith or Republican sign in my Tracy Park neighborhood. Not one. Lots of signs for Monroe who has done a good job as our representative.
I agree with you.Monroe is fighting some headwinds imo. I expect a fairly conservative electorate in Tulsa. Wish he would have tried to appeal more to the center instead of cozying up to the local Dem party. I think he’s going to need this independent votes. Would be happy to be wrong here.
I know both sides have their army of lawyers, but only the losing side really activates them and then the other responds.Only the Pubs with an army of lawyers huh. I know I shouldn’t be but I’m still surprised to see intelligent people completely blind to seeing both sides
Their lawers are only there in response to Trumps lawyers. That didn't happen before Trump's claims of a tainted election happened.Only the Pubs with an army of lawyers huh. I know I shouldn’t be but I’m still surprised to see intelligent people completely blind to seeing both sides
So Hillary’s lawyers didn’t file lawsuits in several states the days following her loss in 2016?Their lawers are only there in response to Trumps lawyers. That didn't happen before Trump's claims of a tainted election happened.
Neither of these people excites me. I want people who can convince people and businesses to move here and run the government efficiently. I have my doubts about both.I can’t vote in the mayoral race either. Drove past a couple of polling places on my way to work this morning and I’ve never seen lines to vote like this. I think Keith gets the independent and Pub vote and it’s enough to carry her across the finish line. Nichols made a mistake taking assistance from the Dem party and blocking Keith from the same. That will hurt him with independents.
That worries me.The most shocking result of the night will be Trump winning Florida by double digits. How times have changed there over the past 8 years.
It’s his home state, most candidates have disproportional advantages in their home stateThe most shocking result of the night will be Trump winning Florida by double digits. How times have changed there over the past 8 years.