TU_BLA said:

Possibly. From the games I've watched he's done a lot of mixing and matching. I know early on Will was starting at left fullback. TU wasn't particularly good early on and has been better lately. I almost think TU would be better served with a 3-5-2 lineup w/ a double 6 pivot instead of the 4-4-2 (maybe they used some 4-3-3 too).

Click to expand...

I have only seen the last two matches and no mention of Edwards I think.

drboobay said:

Edwards has not been playing. Hurt?

Click to expand...

Possibly. From the games I've watched he's done a lot of mixing and matching. I know early on Will was starting at left fullback. TU wasn't particularly good early on and has been better lately. I almost think TU would be better served with a 3-5-2 lineup w/ a double 6 pivot instead of the 4-4-2 (maybe they used some 4-3-3 too).

lawpoke87 said:

Guess you think 3-5-2 gets him another year ?

Click to expand...

My guess is making the conference tournament makes enough people in upper admin OK with continuing on. Considering they earned draws with the 2 best teams in the league the last two times out is good but where was that focus and determination against crappy teams like Rice and UMKC (non-con)? I do like they've played their best soccer the last couple weeks but still. They play Memphis in the 1st round of the AAC tournament again. It's weird that the AAC women play at a "neutral" site as the tournament is being held at Lakewood Ranch outside of Sarasota/Bradenton. It's a nice complex with a stadium field. My son played there in a showcase last December. The men play at campus sites the 1st round and then at the #1 seed the semis and finals. Presumably that will be Memphis, again depends on how tonight shakes out.

Edwards has not been playing. Hurt?

A win by TU all but assures their spot in the AAC tournament and might even move them up to hose a 1st round game depending on how other games shake out. Their upset of USF really put them in a control their own destiny spot.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

TU men play their final home game tonight and it's senior night. Most notably Alex Lopez, Will Edwards, and Alvaro Torrijos. There are a few others but these 3 played 4 seasons at TU and were big contributors to TUs NCAA runs and arguably the best team in TU history

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

drboobay said:

I don't like terms like "white trash" or "Puerto Rican trash" because they are labeling of large groups. I don't think emphasizing "class" distinctions is all that helpful either. My wife is pretty liberal, but she made the point that when we grew up, nobody wanted to be labeled. That was liberalism - don't label me or assume I am this or that because I fit into a group. That was considered prejudice. Now, everyone wants to label everyone else with a million so-called identities. Both sides do it incessantly!

Slightly different subject, but I found it eye opening. NPR did a story interviewing schoolchildren about political views and tolerance, and it was counterintuitive. This is not science, but it does make you think. They asked several kids if they thought their parents would be OK if they went over to play at the house of someone on the other side of the political spectrum. Guess what - most kids whose parents were Trump supporters said "sure, I don't see why not." Most kids whose parents were Harris supporters said "I don't think my parents would let me because they hate Trump so much." What does that say? Who is more open minded?

I say this as someone who can't stand Trump and would vote for pretty much anyone else. I plan to vote for Harris later today. But you have to think about these things and have a little bit of humility IMO.

Click to expand...

That's really interesting, and now it has got me thinking how my own kids would respond. They know that mommy and daddy think Trump is a jerk, but I hope that they don't think we'd be weird about them playing at someone's house that supports him.

In reality, there's a couple of houses that I don't like my kids playing at. One is an outspoken conservative/Trumper household, and the other are outspoken liberals. It has nothing to do with politics. I know that one household has a history of unsecured guns around the house and I find that an unacceptable environment for children. And the other has a bull mastiff that has a known history of biting guests.

I should think that it goes without saying that if my kids spend time at your house, I expect you won't lecture them about politics, no matter who/what you were talking about. That's simply an inappropriate conversation to have with my kids and they wouldn't go back for a while if I heard about it.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

TulsaRulzOSUdrools said:

Dirk, what is your connection to Tulsa youth soccer?

Click to expand...

I have a kid that plays for TSC

Meanwhile….

drboobay said:

I don't like terms like "white trash" or "Puerto Rican trash" because they are labeling of large groups. I don't think emphasizing "class" distinctions is all that helpful either. My wife is pretty liberal, but she made the point that when we grew up, nobody wanted to be labeled. That was liberalism - don't label me or assume I am this or that because I fit into a group. That was considered prejudice. Now, everyone wants to label everyone else with a million so-called identities. Both sides do it incessantly!

Slightly different subject, but I found it eye opening. NPR did a story interviewing schoolchildren about political views and tolerance, and it was counterintuitive. This is not science, but it does make you think. They asked several kids if they thought their parents would be OK if they went over to play at the house of someone on the other side of the political spectrum. Guess what - most kids whose parents were Trump supporters said "sure, I don't see why not." Most kids whose parents were Harris supporters said "I don't think my parents would let me because they hate Trump so much." What does that say? Who is more open minded?

I say this as someone who can't stand Trump and would vote for pretty much anyone else. I plan to vote for Harris later today. But you have to think about these things and have a little bit of humility IMO.

Click to expand...

How much of that attitude is class based? I think, even being poor, many of my friends parents growing up, wouldn’t have had any problem sending their kid to a birthday party in a rich neighborhood…. But many parents do get a bit nervous sending their kids to mobile home parks or projects if nothing else because of the sketchiness of some of the surroundings and some bad habits their children might see / pickup.

It’s something I’ve thought a lot about, living in a somewhat lower socioeconomic area, but being in one of the relatively few higher socioeconomic neighborhoods…

One part of me wants to keep my child grounded and know humility and empathy, but the other part wants to avoid imprinting some of the negative experiences I had hanging out with low class poor kids when I was young. (Not to say rich kids didn’t have their own foibles that I want to avoid as well). That being said, I was a poor kid who was friends with quite a few rich kids so maybe I should be repaying the kindness showed to me.

I suppose ultimately “class” in terms of respectability exists in a realm outside of wealth or poverty. I would argue that Trump himself has very little class and it has rubbed off on many of his supporters who

Also, anecdotally I would say that the parents who were most crappy to me about hanging out with their kids were also the most conservative and religious and were not the wealthiest of my friends. Now that was decades ago, so maybe things have changed.

Hard to predict how the game will go since there are many variables.

• Who will be QB? Three different outcomes are possible depending on who plays.
• Who will call offensive plays? Will Wilson ignore the apparent demand that he choose between being head coach or OC but not both?
• Has the defense finally figured out how to stop other teams?

I don't like terms like "white trash" or "Puerto Rican trash" because they are labeling of large groups. I don't think emphasizing "class" distinctions is all that helpful either. My wife is pretty liberal, but she made the point that when we grew up, nobody wanted to be labeled. That was liberalism - don't label me or assume I am this or that because I fit into a group. That was considered prejudice. Now, everyone wants to label everyone else with a million so-called identities. Both sides do it incessantly!

Slightly different subject, but I found it eye opening. NPR did a story interviewing schoolchildren about political views and tolerance, and it was counterintuitive. This is not science, but it does make you think. They asked several kids if they thought their parents would be OK if they went over to play at the house of someone on the other side of the political spectrum. Guess what - most kids whose parents were Trump supporters said "sure, I don't see why not." Most kids whose parents were Harris supporters said "I don't think my parents would let me because they hate Trump so much." What does that say? Who is more open minded?

I say this as someone who can't stand Trump and would vote for pretty much anyone else. I plan to vote for Harris later today. But you have to think about these things and have a little bit of humility IMO.

lawpoke87 said:

It’s worse. If Dems really cared about those minorities they would be highly critical of their approach to education. Tough love if you will. Instead they might casually mention it and quickly move on. This has been going on for years. They simply don’t care as long as those people vote for them. I think at times they prefer to keep them dependent on government as a means to control.

Click to expand...

When is the Republican Party going to start being critical of its own lower classes approach to education?

And I’m not talking about anti-wokeness.

Threatening violence to resolve disputes…. That’s “white trash”. Doesn’t matter if you are billionaire or a pauper. Class is in your words and deeds.

astonmartin708 said:

I agree that I have not been vocal enough on that for the Dems. You are correct. It’s not that I have not considered the issue previously, I think several minority groups in the Democratic Party tend to have similar issues with ignoring the importance of education and that also why they’re being targeted by Trump to carve off (mainly poor Latinos and African Americans)

What I will say is more of a positive is that this stance is not worming its way into the Dem party platform nationally like it is in the Republican Party.

Click to expand...

It’s worse. If Dems really cared about those minorities they would be highly critical of their approach to education. Tough love if you will. Instead they might casually mention it and quickly move on. This has been going on for years. They simply don’t care as long as those people vote for them. I think at times they prefer to keep them dependent on government as a means to control.

lawpoke87 said:

The problem is you ignore the some of the same characteristics in Dems because your blind partisanship. There’s a significant portion of the Dem base who simply do not believe education is important. Yet I have never seen you call them out. Why….because your inability to logically reason due to partisanship. Your constantly denigrate those who vote differently than you or even those who your Democratic leaders oppose at the time. It is what it is. Unfortunately, it makes you look as dumb as those people you attack.

Click to expand...

I agree that I have not been vocal enough on that for the Dems. You are correct. It’s not that I have not considered the issue previously, I think several minority groups in the Democratic Party tend to have similar issues with ignoring the importance of education and that also why they’re being targeted by Trump to carve off (mainly poor Latinos and African Americans)

What I will say is more of a positive is that this stance is not worming its way into the Dem party platform nationally like it is in the Republican Party.

astonmartin708 said:

I agree that people don’t enjoy it and it can make them combative, but I don’t know if refusing to acknowledge reality does much good either.

It’s a touchy subject.

When I see some of these behaviors being adopted or supported at a national party level (like disparaging learning) I feel it has to be addressed.

Let me say this, I’m not totally devoid of classlessness myself sometimes and I admit I can be hypocritical in this realm, for instance I moved into a neighborhood with a lot of older upper middle class folks not too long ago and I struggle to take care of my yard with the same quality that some of my neighbors do, and it makes me feel pretty terrible to be the person bringing the rest of the neighborhood down sometimes. It’s a never ending struggle to try and get better / do better.

Click to expand...

The problem is you ignore the some of the same characteristics in Dems because your blind partisanship. There’s a significant portion of the Dem base who simply do not believe education is important. Yet I have never seen you call them out. Why….because your inability to logically reason due to partisanship. Your constantly denigrate those who vote differently than you or even those who your Democratic leaders oppose at the time. It is what it is. Unfortunately, it makes you look as dumb as those people you attack.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

drboobay said:

It is the overgeneralization that presents the problem. And the patronizing attitude that gets projected.

Nobody likes to be told they are ignorant. It is a poor tactic for persuasion and leads to defensive reactions. Even irrational ones.

Click to expand...

I agree that people don’t enjoy it and it can make them combative, but I don’t know if refusing to acknowledge reality does much good either.

It’s a touchy subject.

When I see some of these behaviors being adopted or supported at a national party level (like disparaging learning) I feel it has to be addressed.

Let me say this, I’m not totally devoid of classlessness myself sometimes and I admit I can be hypocritical in this realm, for instance I moved into a neighborhood with a lot of older upper middle class folks not too long ago and I struggle to take care of my yard with the same quality that some of my neighbors do especially those who are retirees, and it makes me feel pretty terrible to be the person bringing the rest of the neighborhood down sometimes. It’s a never ending struggle to try and get better / do better.

astonmartin708 said:

I don’t feel too much empathy for people who are okay smoking and / or cursing constantly around (or sometimes at) their children in public and private.

I don’t feel much empathy for people who disparage intelligence and learning (the foundations of which they benefit from every day). I especially don’t feel empathy for people who disparage teachers while simultaneously imparting toxic traits to their children.

I don’t feel much empathy for people who don’t care much for their children living in a better circumstance than they had.

I don’t feel empathy with people who try to resolve disputes with threats and physical violence.

Dems have some of these people too, but proportionally, and this is an anecdotal observation, I have met far more of them who openly support Trump and disparage Democrats in general.

Click to expand...

It is the overgeneralization that presents the problem. And the patronizing attitude that gets projected.

Nobody likes to be told they are ignorant. It is a poor tactic for persuasion and leads to defensive reactions. Even irrational ones.