ADVERTISEMENT

Timing of new coach

It's actually pretty funny. Not as fun has having a good BB team tho.
It was pre- message board time but I felt similarly in JD Barnett's last couple of years.

Went to a few games, determined we were going nowhere, and kind of tuned out. Nobody really wanted to go with me either. My dad wasn't joining me at games yet due to running the restaurant. Very similar.

Didn't really come back until Tubby's NCAA run.

I think the last couple of decades I was more patient because basketball was a shared activity with my dad and my buddy John McNulty. With them both passing last year the bar is higher for motivation.
  • Like
Reactions: chito_and_leon

Timing of new coach

Rosters are so fluid now due to the portal that I’m not sure it matters. Trying to predict how many spots we will need to fill 18 months out is practically impossible
I suspect it's a pretty simple actuarial task (as compared to e.g., pricing life insurance policies). I bet the head of recruiting could give you a pretty accurate idea of how many slots we'll have open. Spitballing it, baseline is 4 plus assume 2 losses, so 6. If a couple of the 4 leave after this year, then it's 2+2 or 4. Based on history and current situation, Konkol would probably bring in at least 1 senior or grad if some of the jrs left. Which puts us at 4-2+1+2 or 5. If non-jrs leave and get replaced with other grad/srs, then the number goes up. My guess would be 5 or 6. Tho I could see it being as many as 7, probably more likely 7 than 4, tho 4 is possible. Hard to imagine fewer than 4. If we're talking 5 or 6 as a decent estimate, I'd rather the new guy fill 33% - 40% of the scholarships than the guy who didn't work out.

Next up for the national razor…

I didn't believe any of that. The only thing I believed was that keeping people on the vaccine helped keep people out of hospitals(beneficial for the patient & the taxed hospital system) & sick for less time.(allowed them to get back to work quicker) This warranted making people take it in order to come to work for the federal government during the emergency. Trump was more responsible for injecting that Trillion into the economy, even though the Democrats would have done it as well. So no party can claim lack of responsibility for that. I also think it was necessary for the time being, and if all we had to deal with in the after effects of Covid was two years of high inflation, with no recession yet, then we got off lucky.

But all of this has nothing to do with what we were talking about, and is just diversionary. It deflects one from talking about whether they believe Ramaswamy/Elon/Trump want to do things to reduce regulations not just reduce repetitive paperwork and waste by consolidating organisations. If they can't profit from it, then they aren't interested. What they can get away with is the only thing on their mind. I hope they won't get away with much, but I worry there won't be any backstops until catastrophe strikes, and it is made evident what they did to the general public. Trump doesn't have much to fear from his party at this point, and that is the only politicians that can do anything to stop catastrophe's like this. All we can do is get out the popcorn.
Agree. My hope is that the focus will be on the elimination of redundancy. I don’t believe Elon’s purpose here (at least in banking reform) is his own personal wealth. The other two mentioned I might agree. Let’s discuss more in depth when the actual proposals come out. I’ve lived through things like 125%’to value loans as well as stated income lending. Neither turned out well in the end

Next up for the national razor…

When have you known me to be naive. I’m not the one who:

- believed if we had more tests we could eliminate covid
- believe cloth masks were an effective measure to prevent the spread of Covid
- believed a vaccine which did little to nothing to prevent or even slow the spread of a disease should be required in order to earn a living
- believe the infusion of a trillion dollars into an economic system already deficient of goods and services wouldn’t have an inflationary effect
- believe inflation we were experiencing was transitory
- believe letting millions and millions of immigrants (including children) into the country without the necessary assets to house and track them was good policy.

Not saying you specifically were naive enough to buy into all the above BS but many on this board were.

I do believe consolidation would be beneficial to the industry. Many of the reports banks are required to file are redundant. This is especially onerous on smaller banks. There is zero reason for the requirement to complete what are basically the same disclosures for multiple regulatory agencies. We screaming about bank runs without knowing a single regulation which is sought to be eliminated. Are we talking about reducing redundant reporting requirements or are we talking about reducing capitalization and significantly changing the parameters of things like the stress test ? Until we know specifics like these it’s impossible to discuss the potential negative effects (if any). Yet…here we are speculating about runs on banks.

I obviously have a significant number of clients who are bankers. Most don’t want to lower the capitalization requirements. The all want less filings. Less duplicate reporting. Basically they prefer a more streamline reporting process to one agency.

Looking forward to seeing the actual proposal.
I didn't believe any of that. The only thing I believed was that keeping people on the vaccine helped keep people out of hospitals(beneficial for the patient & the taxed hospital system) & sick for less time.(allowed them to get back to work quicker) This warranted making people take it in order to come to work for the federal government during the emergency. Trump was more responsible for injecting that Trillion into the economy, even though the Democrats would have done it as well. So no party can claim lack of responsibility for that. I also think it was necessary for the time being, and if all we had to deal with in the after effects of Covid was two years of high inflation, with no recession yet, then we got off lucky.

But all of this has nothing to do with what we were talking about, and is just diversionary. It deflects one from talking about whether they believe Ramaswamy/Elon/Trump want to do things to reduce regulations not just reduce repetitive paperwork and waste by consolidating organisations. If they can't profit from it, then they aren't interested. What they can get away with is the only thing on their mind. I hope they won't get away with much, but I worry there won't be any backstops until catastrophe strikes, and it is made evident what they did to the general public. Trump doesn't have much to fear from his party at this point, and that is the only politicians that can do anything to stop catastrophe's like this. All we can do is get out the popcorn.

Timing of new coach

Seems to me there are 2 scenarios where you give him another year - 1) you still think maybe he's the guy and want to give him another year to show you something or develop, or 2) you just can't do it for practical reasons (e.g., you can't afford the buy out, don't have the internal resources to build up 2 programs at once, have powerful PTSD from the FB search and need a lot of therapy before going back to battle, etc.). Nobody thinks it's 1), sooo...
Option #2 is the most likely scenario.
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW

Timing of new coach

I still feel that the current coach will be allowed to flounder for another year. We’ve got to get the football mess fixed first, Olympic sports can wait.
Seems to me there are 2 scenarios where you give him another year - 1) you still think maybe he's the guy and want to give him another year to show you something or develop, or 2) you just can't do it for practical reasons (e.g., you can't afford the buy out, don't have the internal resources to build up 2 programs at once, have powerful PTSD from the FB search and need a lot of therapy before going back to battle, etc.). Nobody thinks it's 1), sooo...
  • Like
Reactions: loca2874

Next up for the national razor…

All they are speaking in is generalities. That's all they hope to do when they do it. Are you naive enough to think that they won't get rid of any regulations, and 'just save money'' through consolidation of organizations. The savings from that would be so minimal that it's not even worth doing. They will get rid of the regulations they think hinder them. This is a self serving move. We can discuss this when they have done damage.
When have you known me to be naive. I’m not the one who:

- believed if we had more tests we could eliminate covid
- believe cloth masks were an effective measure to prevent the spread of Covid
- believed a vaccine which did little to nothing to prevent or even slow the spread of a disease should be required in order to earn a living
- believe the infusion of a trillion dollars into an economic system already deficient of goods and services wouldn’t have an inflationary effect
- believe inflation we were experiencing was transitory
- believe letting millions and millions of immigrants (including children) into the country without the necessary assets to house and track them was good policy.

Not saying you specifically were naive enough to buy into all the above BS but many on this board were.

I do believe consolidation would be beneficial to the industry. Many of the reports banks are required to file are redundant. This is especially onerous on smaller banks. There is zero reason for the requirement to complete what are basically the same disclosures for multiple regulatory agencies. We screaming about bank runs without knowing a single regulation which is sought to be eliminated. Are we talking about reducing redundant reporting requirements or are we talking about reducing capitalization and significantly changing the parameters of things like the stress test ? Until we know specifics like these it’s impossible to discuss the potential negative effects (if any). Yet…here we are speculating about runs on banks.

I obviously have a significant number of clients who are bankers. Most don’t want to lower the capitalization requirements. The all want less filings. Less duplicate reporting. Basically they prefer a more streamline reporting process to one agency.

Looking forward to seeing the actual proposal.
  • Like
Reactions: rusty-c

GAMES OF INTEREST (12.14.24 - 12.20.24) VS UCF IN ORANGE BOWL CLASSIC

ITS GAMEDAY!!!!! Today Tulsa men travel to Sunrise, Florida to take on the UCF Knights in the AutoNation Orange Bowl Basketball Classic. Tulsa has 3 games, including this one, left in their Non-Conference Slate. One of them doesn’t count on the NET. Then we will start conference play on New Years day at home against Rice. The speadsheet is not talking to the internet today so the NET numbers are not correct. Forgive me.

Today’s games

Memphis at Clemson
Wichita St. at DePaul
Texas St. at FAU
Charlotte at Georgia St.
USF at Utah St.
Tulane at FSU
Oklahoma St. at Oklahoma

Full Schedule is below

AND 1

Today I got tickets to the Army Navy game so that is where I will be today and not watching the basketball game. This should be a great game and I am looking for a Navy victory.

GO NAVY, BEAT ARMY


GO TU!!!



Today’s games



Games



TeamRatingTeamRatingTimeTV
Memphis48atClemson1110:00 a.m.ESPN2
Wichita St.79atDePaul7012:00 p.m.FS1
Texas St.108atFla. Atlantic1011:00 p.m.ESPN+
Charlotte281atGeorgia St.2601:00 p.m.ESPN+
UCF91vsTulsa3101:00 p.m.ESPNU
South Fla.172atUtah St.193:00 p.m.
Tulane253atFlorida St.813:30 p.m.ACCN
Missouri St.201atWashington St.654:00 p.m.ESPN+
Detroit Mercy255atDavidson1306:00 p.m.ESPN+
Oklahoma St.85atOklahoma447:00 p.m.ESPNU

Rankings

RankTrendSchoolRecordRoadNeutralHomeQ1Q2Q3Q4
48Down 17Memphis7-21-03-13-1
69Down 1North Texas4-31-21-12-0
79EvenWichita St.8-11-02-15-0
101Up 1Fla. Atlantic4-51-23-20-1
145Up 5Rice7-32-12-23-0
169EvenEast Carolina5-30-12-13-1
172EvenSouth Fla.5-40-22-23-0
177Down 1Temple4-40-22-22-0
215Up 5UAB4-50-11-23-2
234Up 11UTSA2-50-41-01-1
253Up 2Tulane3-60-20-23-2
281EvenCharlotte3-30-10-03-2
310Down 1Tulsa3-60-21-12-3


Rest of GOI Teams

RankTrendSchoolRecordRoadNeutralHomeQ1Q2Q3Q4
74Down 1Loyola Chicago7-01-00-06-0
85Up 15Oklahoma St.6-22-01-23-0
91Down 5UCF7-20-00-27-0
180EvenSouthern U.2-42-40-00-0
201EvenMissouri St.4-41-11-22-1
218Up 8Little Rock4-42-40-02-0
255Down 6Detroit Mercy4-62-20-22-2
260Down 8Georgia St.3-50-31-12-1
329Down 2Oral Roberts1-60-50-01-1
358EvenArk.-Pine Bluff1-80-80-01-0
364EvenMississippi Val.0-80-80-00-0


Quad Tracker

Q1Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75
Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135
WinQuadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 136-240
noneQuadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353
Loss
Loyola Chicago (A)
Q2
Win
None
Loss
None
Q3
Win
None
Loss
Missouri St. (A)
Oklahoma St. (H)
Q4
Wins
Ark. Pine Bluff (H)
Oral Roberts (H)
Detroit Mercy (N)
Loss
Little Rock (H)
Georgia St. (N)
Southern U.
Hope you had a good time ! That would be a cool game to watch
  • Like
Reactions: loca2874

Next up for the national razor…

All I’ve read is the idea of consolidating the FDIC, Federal Reserve and Comprroller into one regulatory agency. Something which makes sense from a banking and reporting perspective. What specific deregulations are you guys seeing which are going to trigger these bank runs? Same question regarding Elon’s purpose here is to enrich himself?
All they are speaking in is generalities. That's all they hope to do when they do it. Are you naive enough to think that they won't get rid of any regulations, and 'just save money'' through consolidation of organizations. The savings from that would be so minimal that it's not even worth doing. They will get rid of the regulations they think hinder them. This is a self serving move. We can discuss this when they have done damage.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT