ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

OFFENSIVE LINEMAN

G
Oak775 said:
If the whole offensive line transferred that would be an incredible thing.

The offensive line at TU may have been one of worst, if the not the worst, in the history of NCAA division one football. Ever.
Click to expand...
It is sad we lost Young Bear, and he is getting some decent offers. There was a lot of youngsters on the OL. Tanner is another youngster in the Portal. He has picked up offers from BYU, Kansas, KSU, Fresno St, and Houston.


We just picked up a commitment from Bixby's Evan McClure who RS as a walk on at OU.
Click to expand...

UCF thread

G
loca2874 said:
I just finished watching this game and I disagree with some of you guys. I though Tulsa played a really good game. We were shooting over 50 percent in the first half. We ended at like 46 but some of the poor shooting in the second half was us trying to catch up. We did have 11 turnovers to their 5 but we got 12 points off turnovers. That is huge for this team right now. The area that is killing us and could have changed the trajectory of the game is out Free Throw shooting. my god we were under 70 percent.

They made a good point during the broadcast. If we had held on to Missouri State, Georgia State and Southern we would have been 7-3 going into this game and you guys would be speaking differently. If they are going to continue to improve then I am going to be very optimistic about the rest of the season.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I made that point about having Garcia for most if not all of this season. We would have likely won those three games. Maybe even Ark Little Rock would have turned out differently. We certainly would have looked more respectable against OSU & Loyola. We might have had a shot in this game.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: loca2874 and caneks

GAMES OF INTEREST (12.14.24 - 12.20.24) VS UCF IN ORANGE BOWL CLASSIC

loca2874
Babe the Blue Ox said:
They wouldn’t necessarily have to have been ranked ahead of Boise, just Arizona State or Clemson.

That was the P4s doomsday scenario if one of their conference champions was not one of the 5 highest rated champs. At one point, there was a possibility of the Big 12 or ACC winner not making the playoffs.
Click to expand...
good point.
Click to expand...

UCF thread

loca2874
I just finished watching this game and I disagree with some of you guys. I though Tulsa played a really good game. We were shooting over 50 percent in the first half. We ended at like 46 but some of the poor shooting in the second half was us trying to catch up. We did have 11 turnovers to their 5 but we got 12 points off turnovers. That is huge for this team right now. The area that is killing us and could have changed the trajectory of the game is out Free Throw shooting. my god we were under 70 percent.

They made a good point during the broadcast. If we had held on to Missouri State, Georgia State and Southern we would have been 7-3 going into this game and you guys would be speaking differently. If they are going to continue to improve then I am going to be very optimistic about the rest of the season.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: TulsaFan01, mmckell, caneks and 1 other person

GAMES OF INTEREST (12.14.24 - 12.20.24) VS UCF IN ORANGE BOWL CLASSIC

Babe the Blue Ox
loca2874 said:
I am glad who won the game but it was great atmosphere. I did think Army was going to win and I really thought it would be closer than what it was. I dont think Monken called a good game for Army. They are better than what they showed.

The selection for the CFP was before the Army Navy game. So if they beat notre dame and were ranked ahead of Boise they would have still recieved the Nod as the spots were solidified before this game.
Click to expand...
They wouldn’t necessarily have to have been ranked ahead of Boise, just Arizona State or Clemson.

That was the P4s doomsday scenario if one of their conference champions was not one of the 5 highest rated champs. At one point, there was a possibility of the Big 12 or ACC winner not making the playoffs.
Click to expand...

OFFENSIVE LINEMAN

O
Gmoney4WW said:
Christian is the only one who is definitely on board so far. You're getting your skis out front a little too early. Give him a couple of three days before expecting to know that.
Click to expand...
If the whole offensive line transferred that would be an incredible thing.

The offensive line at TU may have been one of worst, if the not the worst, in the history of NCAA division one football. Ever.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: TULSARISING

GAMES OF INTEREST (12.14.24 - 12.20.24) VS UCF IN ORANGE BOWL CLASSIC

G
loca2874 said:
I am glad who won the game but it was great atmosphere. I did think Army was going to win and I really thought it would be closer than what it was. I dont think Monken called a good game for Army. They are better than what they showed.

The selection for the CFP was before the Army Navy game. So if they beat notre dame and were ranked ahead of Boise they would have still recieved the Nod as the spots were solidified before this game.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, I forgot that it worked the other way around. It would have been the CFB playoffs who were disappointed if they beat Notre Dame and lost to Navy.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: loca2874

GAMES OF INTEREST (12.14.24 - 12.20.24) VS UCF IN ORANGE BOWL CLASSIC

loca2874
Gmoney4WW said:
You are just in a good mood cuz of who won the game. 😜

I was surprised that Navy won. That would have sucked if Army beat Notre Dame and lost a shot to go to the
CFP.
Click to expand...
I am glad who won the game but it was great atmosphere. I did think Army was going to win and I really thought it would be closer than what it was. I dont think Monken called a good game for Army. They are better than what they showed.

The selection for the CFP was before the Army Navy game. So if they beat notre dame and were ranked ahead of Boise they would have still recieved the Nod as the spots were solidified before this game.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: nevadanatural

Next up for the national razor…

L
Gmoney4WW said:
I don't think Musk's goal's with money are to have more of it, so he can buy more things. It is so that he can swing more business deals. fund more projects. He is goal oriented and has a large ego that drags him to the next deal/task. That doesn't stop him from changing the regulations, just what he does with the increased money he has access to, when he changes them for this purpose. His reasons for wanting more money don't affect how it affects the public.
Click to expand...
With a net worth of over $400B, I can’t imagine there’s a significant need for new ways to access capital for new business ventures. Musk has borrowed against his Tesla and SpaceX holdings for years. His net worth has more than doubled over the past year vastly increasing his ability to raise additional capital
Click to expand...

Next up for the national razor…

G
lawpoke87 said:
Agree. My hope is that the focus will be on the elimination of redundancy. I don’t believe Elon’s purpose here (at least in banking reform) is his own personal wealth. The other two mentioned I might agree. Let’s discuss more in depth when the actual proposals come out. I’ve lived through things like 125%’to value loans as well as stated income lending. Neither turned out well in the end
Click to expand...
I don't think Musk's goal's with money are to have more of it, so he can buy more things. It is so that he can swing more business deals. fund more projects. He is goal oriented and has a large ego that drags him to the next deal/task. That doesn't stop him from changing the regulations, just what he does with the increased money he has access to, when he changes them for this purpose. His reasons for wanting more money don't affect how it affects the public.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: astonmartin708
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back