Yep. They are stupid.The Oklahoma Democratic Party has much more to worry about than Keith’s consultant having access to party information. I don’t believe that excuse for a minute btw. It’s a ploy to give Monroe an advantage in the race. I predict this move will backfire and motivate VanNorman voters to vote for Keith as it paints her as the non Democratic Party establishment candidate.
Not following endorsement of Keith from the Tulsa FOP I see.I visited with a friend on the police force, he had good things to say about Keith and Monroe.
However, he believed overall that Monroe was the better candidate on what he believed were some very key issues.
Glad to see people think for themselves.Not following endorsement of Keith from the Tulsa FOP I see.
"Democrat State Party Central Committee"... hmmmmI don't believe in party lines or other cult enforcement tactics. This makes me want to vote Keith now.
State Democrats deny Karen Keith access to voter database; she blames 'far-left activists'
The state party Central Committee made the decision in part over concern that the information would be accessed by a campaign consultant who represents Republicans.tulsaworld.com
Never heard of a Republican Central Committee and i've been one for 40 yrsThere is a Republican one too, no?
Could be.Never heard of a Republican Central Committee and i've been one for 40 yrs
There is a Leadership Council with members elected by precinct reps and a Republican National Committee...Could be.
Komrade General Secretary Andrews..General Secretary Andrews?
They certainly make certain criticisms easy!Komrade General Secretary Andrews..
No, but I don't know that I would trust it if I saw it. Polling in the first election showed Keith getting 46%, and Van Norman and Nichols getting much less. Obviously they had a bunch of people who were not going to vote, paid little attention to the candidate's, and just recognized Kieth's name.Has anyone seen any polling for the two way matchup ?
Agree. Local polling companies tend to be awful.No, but I don't know that I would trust it if I saw it. Polling in the first election showed Keith getting 46%, and Van Norman and Nichols getting much less. Obviously they had a bunch of people who were not going to vote, paid little attention to the candidate's, and just recognized Kieth's name.