Kelly would have been a good pick, but his anti 2A views would have made winning key southern states problematic..She should have picked Kelly. This is a superficial pick. Appearances will quickly fail when the campaign gets very far along.
вперед товарищ!!!!!!Walz helps the ticket in all the rust belt states, he'll help the Harris ticket win Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, a rural every man. Arizona, Nevada and now North Carolina look very achievable if not likely to go blue. Can't wait fot the debates, all you Republicans will get to see your boy prime time, should be a thing of beauty, he's at the absolute top of his game.
Those people weren't there, there's no reflection of them coming off the plane. 80 and crazy, hell of a place to be.вперед товарищ!!!!!!
Support for Medicare and Social Security does not make one a communist.Walz may help her, but her commuistic tendencies will hurt
everyone supports ss/mc. it how she wants to use it. Medicare fo all. redistribution of wealth. open border, pro. hamas, reparations, ...Support for Medicare and Social Security does not make one a communist.
Israel let them come across their border & ambush some IDF, then ransack rape & pillage innocents before showing up to fight. Oh, and when they showed up to fight, they killed more israeli citizens than Hamas fighters that were left behind. I don’t care about Palestine & I don’t care about Israel, they’re both a bunch of squatters in my opinion.You never answered the question about Kamala meeting with Netanyahu.
You are arguing with the wrong person here. My views on this issue fall much more into the Republican views, and I think Kamala is a bit simplistic here. But to continue pointing out the fallacy of your arguments, it doesn't matter if Palestinians want to eliminate them as a people, they aren't capable, despite the Iranian and Lebanese funding. For 1 5-30 years before Oct 7, the Palestinians killed on average almost 20 Israeli soldiers and/or civilians per year. That's hardly elimination capability, despite their desires. Where a little over 400 Palestinians were killed per year for those same years.
The direct conflicts with Lebanon shared an approximately similar amount of Israelis killed per year as opposed to a little closer to even on the side of the Lebanese. Nobody has exhibited the capability to eliminate the Jewish population over the past 30 years. So when the civilian casualties jumped to 39k Palestinian over the past year and a half compared to around 2k on Oct 7, and in fighting since then of Israeli civilians and soldiers. The numbers didn't exactly change from the large gap that existed before. In fact that gap widened for the Israeli's, as far as the # killed in a short period of time, while the ratio stayed the same.
So once again, your argument that they want to eliminate them doesn't hold up, comparable to their ability to do so. Like I said though, I am only pointing out the fallacy of your arguments. This is a much more complicated situation that Kamala doesn't admit to herself, when forming her views. But a numbers-to-numbers argument is not a good argument on your part no matter what their desire to do the israelis. They are constantly killing more Palestinians and other enemies by a wide gap.
None of you you just stated is true though, so there's that. Strongest border bill in decade, in decades, was voted against recently by the GOP, at the command of Trump.everyone supports ss/mc. it how she wants to use it. Medicare fo all. redistribution of wealth. open border, pro. hamas, reparations, ...
government is the answer.
None of you you just stated is true though, so there's that. Strongest border bill in decade, in decades, was voted against recently by the GOP, at the command of Trump.
What do hamas and reparations (which won’t happen) have to do with communism? Lmaoeveryone supports ss/mc. it how she wants to use it. Medicare fo all. redistribution of wealth. open border, pro. hamas, reparations, ...
government is the answer.
Damn, that’s embarrassing. Reparations are communism. Hamas is “HONOR THE ONE WE DEEM TO BE OPPRESSED, SIDE WITH THE OPPRESSED OR GET CANCELLED!” That is the logic of the pro Hamas protestors in the USA.What do hamas and reparations (which won’t happen) have to do with communism? Lmao
If you think Hamas is communist, I think they need to rebrand with some hammers and sickles.
no need for the border bill; it's all covered by the constitution, plus it contained lots of minutiaNone of you you just stated is true though, so there's that. Strongest border bill in decade, in decades, was voted against recently by the GOP, at the command of Trump.
she supports terrorists, and BIG government.What do hamas and reparations (which won’t happen) have to do with communism? Lmao
If you think Hamas is communist, I think they need to rebrand with some hammers and sickles.
Lol... I think it's funny that in the same paragraph a Project 2025 Historian / Professor can praise Lincoln for holding the Union together and (with the help of Congress) imposing federal mandates on abolition.... but then talk about abortion and suddenly start bashing the 20th century progressive movement and espousing state's rights.she supports terrorists, and BIG government.
all thing statr with the gov for her. she wants a federal law for abortion, the Supremes have said it a state by state issue. . .
Everyone knows the Supremes have "Baby Love"The Supremes?? I thought they broke up when Diana Ross left the group.....
It’s okay, because this is a common misperception.Lol... I think it's funny that in the same paragraph a Project 2025 Historian / Professor can praise Lincoln for holding the Union together and (with the help of Congress) imposing federal mandates on abolition.... but then talk about abortion and suddenly start bashing the 20th century progressive movement and espousing state's rights.
It's almost like some seismic shifts have gone on within the Republican Party since 1860
The people who were protesting on Jan 6 were defending what you call democracy, which is actually a constitutional Republic (& to the republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, with Liberty & Justice for all.)You limit the scope of that event to a couple 100 people… it wasn’t just a couple hundred people… it was a couple hundred people who were being egged on and lied to by many multiple political pundits, public figures, and politicians… none of whom were ever punished for encouraging such an event. When I say “This is the Republican Party” it’s not the 100 stooges who are the worst of that party… it’s the people at the top who are praying on the stupidity of others for their own gain, to the detriment of Democracy.
Again… inflation isn’t even close to as big of a problem. Hell I would take another Great Depression just to keep the people who tried to subvert Democracy out of office.
And no one is coming for your freedom of speech. Quit whining about what the same people who tried to overthrow democracy a few short months ago tell you to whine about.
Well if he’s intent on causing WWIII before leaving office why should he step down?Freewill is a coup now. Realize that Trump doesn't have it in him to do what Biden did, step down for the good of the country, good of his party. I must say it's nice to have the national Democratic Party no longer chained to the misadventures of one Hunter Biden, a certain freedom there now.
No, it had nothing to do with the hippie movement of the sixties, or the civil rights act, or South and the North flipping their belief systems related to that, or the white southerners being scared that their hold on power was going to disappear, or the higher level of education in the north, or any of the other things tied to the change. But no, they just changed colors, that's all. There is racism in both parties. Membership in a party does not exclude one from being racist. But the racism in the now Republican south, is much more expansive than racism in the Democratic North and East. And it used to be the opposite.It’s okay, because this is a common misperception.
The only things that have changed is the colors. Before Reagan, republicans were the party represented by the color Blue. For some reason, post-Reagan, it switched to red. The parties never switched.
Democrats were the party of the KKK, the confederacy (pro-slavery) & not one of them signed the Civil Rights Act of 1965. Did I mention Jim Crow? Yeah, they own that.
If you make sandwiches & there’s only one other sandwich maker in town, they’ve got a better sandwich but you have a bigger problem. You have a history of being racist. You need to sell sandwiches gotta feed your family. What are you gonna do? Accuse the other sandwich guy of being racist.
This is how, after years of accusing each & every one of their opponents of being racist, people begin to mistakenly associate democrats with Abraham Lincoln & the Union. I believe this is also why democrats were so inclined to get behind Labor Unions, well, this & their blatant preference for corruption.
Many Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act. Admittedly not all of them…. There were of course a bunch of blue dog Democrats that would whine that the party left them and turned Republican alongside Reagan.It’s okay, because this is a common misperception.
The only things that have changed is the colors. Before Reagan, republicans were the party represented by the color Blue. For some reason, post-Reagan, it switched to red. The parties never switched.
Democrats were the party of the KKK, the confederacy (pro-slavery) & not one of them signed the Civil Rights Act of 1965. Did I mention Jim Crow? Yeah, they own that.
If you make sandwiches & there’s only one other sandwich maker in town, they’ve got a better sandwich but you have a bigger problem. You have a history of being racist. You need to sell sandwiches gotta feed your family. What are you gonna do? Accuse the other sandwich guy of being racist.
This is how, after years of accusing each & every one of their opponents of being racist, people begin to mistakenly associate democrats with Abraham Lincoln & the Union. I believe this is also why democrats were so inclined to get behind Labor Unions, well, this & their blatant preference for corruption.
I don’t support price controls based on their history and limited success elsewhere, but I do think there is a level of regulatory over site that can be a middle ground. The US is not the first western entity to look into price gouging of grocers during this inflationary cycle. I’ve seen articles on the UK, Canada, and France all doing the same.Same story, rent control.
The proposal doesn’t limit the governments ability to regulate prices and profits to inflationary cycles. As such it’s overly broad and appears to give the government wide discretion to regulate private business. As you correctly stated, price controls have a poor history of success. It’s more of a low IQ voter proposal to blame inflation on Walmart.I don’t support price controls based on their history and limited success elsewhere, but I do think there is a level of regulatory over site that can be a middle ground. The US is not the first western entity to look into price gouging of grocers during this inflationary cycle. I’ve seen articles on the UK, Canada, and France all doing the same.
That’s why we have a Congress who should debate and amend / alter such proposals, even if their first draft is insufficiently broad. The solution is not just to ignore the problem.The proposal doesn’t limit the governments ability to regulate prices and profits to inflationary cycles. As such it’s overly broad and appears to give the government wide discretion to regulate private business. As you correctly stated, price controls have a poor history of success. It’s more of a low IQ voter proposal to blame inflation on Walmart.
1) The fact that a proposal which would give the federal government vast control over private commerce was made by a Presidential candidate is troublesome.That’s why we have a Congress who should debate and amend / alter such proposals, even if their first draft is insufficiently broad. The solution is not just to ignore the problem.
Taking advantage of an inflationary environment does not run afoul of those laws, so the answer could be yes, especially for grocers who represent near monopolies.1) The fact that a proposal which would give the federal government vast control over private commerce was made by a Presidential candidate is troublesome.
2). There are already laws in place to address price gouging in times of national emergencies. Do we need additional laws widening federal control over commerce ?
A pandemic certainly does though. Not sure how the law is written but there would be an argument there was still an emergency situation. I would rather see the existing laws modified to included the immediate effects of a national emergency.Taking advantage of an inflationary environment does not run afoul of those laws, so the answer could be yes, especially for grocers who represent near monopolies.
Agreed.A pandemic certainly does though. Not sure how the law is written but there would be an argument there was still an emergency situation. I would rather see the existing laws modified to included the immediate effects of a national emergency.