I get so tired of republicans idiots saying the official doesn't know what she's saying without even going into the matter, and asking questions. It's just a meme for them. She sounded like she was reading from a script & didn't realize that they didn't put the web address in the speech. You could read that and not realize for a decent while that the web address wasn't there. She didn't sound out of it. She sounded like she read what was in front of her, and mainly concentrated on reading it properly and with confidence, not paying attention to what she was reading as attentively as she should have. Maybe she has mental problems, but she's only 71, and I doubt it.
Those homes are not really million dollar homes. The land is million dollar land. The home itself is often cheaper.so which is more important to save, a fish or thousands of million dollar homes? who pay for it now? Will Cali create a new tax. please Insurance company, i live in AZ, don't raise my ratesbecause of local incompetence
The problem with Cali is they won’t clear the brush (fuel). They won’t do control burns (environmental). They won’t retain water in their reservoirs (again environmental). Mayor cut the fire budget by $17M last year. They couldn’t get water to the worst affected areas. Everyone involved in this cluster should lose their jobs…some will but not enough.Meanwhile, Trump blames it on California’s water conservation use for “worthless fish”….
Funny how he only seems to care about the environmental byproducts of industry when it’s a wind turbine.
If you’re keeping score at home birds > fish in Trump land.
….but if he is okay with killing off the fish what are all of the eagles going to eat? Does that mean he’s actually okay with killing the birds too? It’s paradox of douchebaggery.
The problem is there is not enough water to go around.The problem with Cali is they won’t clear the brush (fuel). They won’t do control burns (environmental). They won’t retain water in their reservoirs (again environmental). Mayor cut the fire budget by $17M last year. They couldn’t get water to the worst affected areas. Everyone involved in this cluster should lose their jobs…some will but not enough.
They were apparently warnedThe problem is there is not enough water to go around.
The state of prescribed fires doubled between '21 & '23. They are upping their budget from 2.5B between to 4B between now & 2028. They added 16 helicopters and 7 air tankers to their fleet. and doubled their use of drones, and have been utilizing ai to address what to do about it. They have increased their fire fighter budget massively, and are in the midst of hiring 2000 more firefighters over the next five years. Maybe they are not moving fast enough, but they are not sitting on their aSS. Unlike Trump who procedes to blame them, and offer no beneficial advice or federal action/assistance. The blame game doesn't do the situation any benefit.
I'm not talking city budget, this is a far bigger issue than a city budget. This is a state issue, and should be a federal issue as well. Every states insurance will go up now. There should be federal involvement as well. Do you not think there were state firefighters there as well as city. That is addressing it on too low a level. I'm sure city cuts were not good, but they weren't the only issue involved. The responsibility is not just at the city level.They were apparently warned
A month before fires, L.A. fire chief warned budget cuts were hampering emergency response
The Los Angeles Fire Department's budget was cut by $17.6 million, about 2%, this fiscal year. The fire chief warned last month it would make it harder to respond to emergencies.www.cbsnews.com
blah, blah, blah, I have no clue what I'm talking about, it's all the democrats fault, they should have a charity fire department, i add nothing to the conversation, I'm just a greedy old curmudgeon who has nothing better to do, than scream my tired old rants on here over and over., get off of my lawn, I'm just an a0.budget cuts: hydrants with no water, too few firetruck, too few trained crews, . . .
I do agree there but the cuts in the city budget fall directly on our good absentee mayor. That money could/should have been used to clear those hillsides. I’m not sure it would have mattered how many fire fighters were there btw. When you fail to clear the dead undergrowth either manually or with controlled burns you have a pending disaster. That falls squarely on the city and the state. They control the environmental restrictions in the city and state. There’s also no excuse for not having water to properly fight those fires. Again…that’s a city and state issue. Many voices were warning of this impending disaster. California ignored them. That’s 100% on them.I'm not talking city budget, this is a far bigger issue than a city budget. This is a state issue, and should be a federal issue as well. Every states insurance will go up now. There should be federal involvement as well. Do you not think there were state firefighters there as well as city. That is addressing it on too low a level. I'm sure city cuts were not good, but they weren't the only issue involved. The responsibility is not just at the city level.
Edited:
Some yes, some no. Some were dropped by State Farm due to this risk and some folks didn’t use another carrier or the carrier of last resort. Many will lose everything.Are those homes covered by fire insurance policies? I’ve heard mixed answers
Maybe they had been putting it off for years, and it couldn't be put off any longer.
Did you read that entire article?
If you are talking about her reading 'url' as a website, yes I saw it. I thought it was a faux pas that shouldn't have been made. But it wasn't unforgivable, as long as they got it up on the screen shortly afterwords.Did you see the clown show?
My post was the LA Fire Chief. Had zero to do with TrumpBlaming water issues on "worthless fish" is as accurate as his claiming the US citizens and vets who blew the Tesla truck outside his hotel or ran down people New Orleans were 'migrants". Trump just says**t, and paying attention to it is a waste of time.
What brush are you talking about? Have you seen these hillsides? It’s not forest undergrowth we’re talking aboutThe problem with Cali is they won’t clear the brush (fuel). They won’t do control burns (environmental). They won’t retain water in their reservoirs (again environmental). Mayor cut the fire budget by $17M last year. They couldn’t get water to the worst affected areas. Everyone involved in this cluster should lose their jobs…some will but not enough.
I’m in Southern California several times a year for soccer. So yes, I’m very familiar. They said, not being able to get water to those fires was probably the biggest failure. It being more aggressive with clearing undergrowth was also a problem . Watching the fire chief and mayor go after one another has been great theater btwWhat brush are you talking about? Have you seen these hillsides? It’s not forest undergrowth we’re talking about
How many control burns did they do in the LA area, specifically the are that is now Topanga State Park during the 1910's, 20's, 30's, 40's, 50’s, 60’s, 70’s and 80's?
They have a whole ocean right next door to source water from.
Funny that for more than 80 years of that area being populated, they basically didn’t clear the brush on those hillsides and they barely had an issue….I’m in Southern California several times a year for soccer. So yes, I’m very familiar. They said, not being able to get water to those fires was probably the biggest failure. It being more aggressive with clearing undergrowth was also a problem . Watching the fire chief and mayor go after one another has been great theater btw
How red tape strangled California forest management before LA fires
"Mother nature doesn't wait for paperwork."www.newsweek.com
You want to compare the density of houses in those hill in 2025 compared to 1930?Funny that for more than 80 years of that area being populated, they basically didn’t clear the brush on those hillsides and they barely had an issue….
It’s ironic that you these fires against lackadaisical human intervention, but humans hadn’t been intervening in any of that for more than a century and never saw the frequency or magnitude of these burns in that area. You can’t seem to precisely put your finger on why they might see more fires there now than they did in 1930…… and it’s not brush control or water maintenance because they weren’t doing that then to any great degree either.