SoCal fires
- Thread starter lawpoke87
- Start date
The lovely mayor did not show up at the public hearings on the tragedy in NOLA today. She's a piece of work.
The police chief was in attendance but she said she wouldn't be answering any questions.
Lot of angry citizens and peeved city council members at the meeting.
I will be surprised if the police chief keeps her position or doesn't resign.
They have the Super Bowl in four weeks and Mardi Gras three weeks later.
The police chief was in attendance but she said she wouldn't be answering any questions.
Lot of angry citizens and peeved city council members at the meeting.
I will be surprised if the police chief keeps her position or doesn't resign.
They have the Super Bowl in four weeks and Mardi Gras three weeks later.
Last edited:
I get so tired of republicans idiots saying the official doesn't know what she's saying without even going into the matter, and asking questions. It's just a meme for them. She sounded like she was reading from a script & didn't realize that they didn't put the web address in the speech. You could read that and not realize for a decent while that the web address wasn't there. She didn't sound out of it. She sounded like she read what was in front of her, and mainly concentrated on reading it properly and with confidence, not paying attention to what she was reading as attentively as she should have. Maybe she has mental problems, but she's only 71, and I doubt it.
Meanwhile, Trump blames it on California’s water conservation use for “worthless fish”….
Funny how he only seems to care about the environmental byproducts of industry when it’s a wind turbine.
If you’re keeping score at home birds > fish in Trump land.
….but if he is okay with killing off the fish what are all of the eagles going to eat? Does that mean he’s actually okay with killing the birds too? It’s paradox of douchebaggery.
Funny how he only seems to care about the environmental byproducts of industry when it’s a wind turbine.
If you’re keeping score at home birds > fish in Trump land.
….but if he is okay with killing off the fish what are all of the eagles going to eat? Does that mean he’s actually okay with killing the birds too? It’s paradox of douchebaggery.
Those homes are not really million dollar homes. The land is million dollar land. The home itself is often cheaper.
As far as fish go, the same argument can be made for literally any critical industry…. Everyone thinks they should be allowed to take environmental shortcuts so they can achieve a desired outcome. Who decides that it’s okay to kill fish but not eagles?
what happened to Bidens Infrastructure "Build Back Better" money? Seems like preparing for something like this should have been a high. priority
too many Social Programs, not enough Structure programs
too many Social Programs, not enough Structure programs
The problem with Cali is they won’t clear the brush (fuel). They won’t do control burns (environmental). They won’t retain water in their reservoirs (again environmental). Mayor cut the fire budget by $17M last year. They couldn’t get water to the worst affected areas. Everyone involved in this cluster should lose their jobs…some will but not enough.
The problem is there is not enough water to go around.
The state of prescribed fires doubled between '21 & '23. They are upping their budget from 2.5B between to 4B between now & 2028. They added 16 helicopters and 7 air tankers to their fleet. and doubled their use of drones, and have been utilizing ai to address what to do about it. They have increased their fire fighter budget massively, and are in the midst of hiring 2000 more firefighters over the next five years. Maybe they are not moving fast enough, but they are not sitting on their aSS. Unlike Trump who procedes to blame them, and offer no beneficial advice or federal action/assistance. The blame game doesn't do the situation any benefit.
They were apparently warned
A month before fires, L.A. fire chief warned budget cuts were hampering emergency response
The Los Angeles Fire Department's budget was cut by $17.6 million, about 2%, this fiscal year. The fire chief warned last month it would make it harder to respond to emergencies.
www.cbsnews.com
I'm not talking city budget, this is a far bigger issue than a city budget. This is a state issue, and should be a federal issue as well. Every states insurance will go up now. There should be federal involvement as well. Do you not think there were state firefighters there as well as city. That is addressing it on too low a level. I'm sure city cuts were not good, but they weren't the only issue involved. The responsibility is not just at the city level.They were apparently warned
A month before fires, L.A. fire chief warned budget cuts were hampering emergency response
The Los Angeles Fire Department's budget was cut by $17.6 million, about 2%, this fiscal year. The fire chief warned last month it would make it harder to respond to emergencies.
budget cuts: hydrants with no water, too few firetruck, too few trained crews, . . .
blah, blah, blah, I have no clue what I'm talking about, it's all the democrats fault, they should have a charity fire department, i add nothing to the conversation, I'm just a greedy old curmudgeon who has nothing better to do, than scream my tired old rants on here over and over., get off of my lawn, I'm just an a0.
I do agree there but the cuts in the city budget fall directly on our good absentee mayor. That money could/should have been used to clear those hillsides. I’m not sure it would have mattered how many fire fighters were there btw. When you fail to clear the dead undergrowth either manually or with controlled burns you have a pending disaster. That falls squarely on the city and the state. They control the environmental restrictions in the city and state. There’s also no excuse for not having water to properly fight those fires. Again…that’s a city and state issue. Many voices were warning of this impending disaster. California ignored them. That’s 100% on them.
LA Wildfires: An Avoidable Tragedy
State efforts to prevent them have been costly and impractical, with grim results.
www.city-journal.org
where did the budget cuts go?I do agree there but the cuts in the city budget fall directly on our good absentee mayor. That money could/should have been used to clear those hillsides. I’m not sure it would have mattered how many fire fighters were there btw. When you fail to clear the dead undergrowth either manually or with controlled burns you have a pending disaster. That falls squarely on the city and the state. They control the environmental restrictions in the city and state. There’s also no excuse for not having water to properly fight those fires. Again…that’s a city and state issue. Many voices were warning of this impending disaster. California ignored them. That’s 100% on them.
LA Wildfires: An Avoidable Tragedy
State efforts to prevent them have been costly and impractical, with grim results.
First, all of the budget cuts that came across most departments went to cover anticipated gaps in revenue.(taxes) And despite those cuts they now believe there will still be a revenue gap of 400M. If they had cut the fire department budget by as much as they reported, it would be a 2% cut. They did increase two budget areas for the police department, and to deal with the homeless problem.
Despite prior reports, it also seems they increased the fire department dept budget as well. This fire department 'budget cut' was manufactured by an ignorant media, without a thorough investigation to find out all of the facts. If this had been discussed with the journalists that covered the budget, they would have probably known this. Nice interdepartmental non communication. There was an allocation of 76 million to pay fire department personnel that was placed in a separate place from the overall budget because contract negotiations were still ongoing. This was placed in a separate fund to deal with the legalities of the negotiations.
So, there was a 56M increase in the fire department budget. Rather than a 2% cut, there was actually a 6.7% increase. I'm sure the fire department was aware of this. Their bitching was probably because they wanted a bigger increase. Politics of bitching about a reduction that was an increase.
www.dailynews.com
Despite prior reports, it also seems they increased the fire department dept budget as well. This fire department 'budget cut' was manufactured by an ignorant media, without a thorough investigation to find out all of the facts. If this had been discussed with the journalists that covered the budget, they would have probably known this. Nice interdepartmental non communication. There was an allocation of 76 million to pay fire department personnel that was placed in a separate place from the overall budget because contract negotiations were still ongoing. This was placed in a separate fund to deal with the legalities of the negotiations.
So, there was a 56M increase in the fire department budget. Rather than a 2% cut, there was actually a 6.7% increase. I'm sure the fire department was aware of this. Their bitching was probably because they wanted a bigger increase. Politics of bitching about a reduction that was an increase.
FACTCHECK: Was the LAFD budget cut? No, it actually increased. Here’s how.
Critics on social media have alleged that Mayor Karen Bass cut the city fire department’s budget by $23 million this year.
www.dailynews.com
Last edited:
Edited:
I don't know, you'd have to ask her or the Los Angelos Daily News about that. And she talked about that money allowed to be used later on, after the negotiations. I think it was semantics.
Even if there were a 2% cut, I doubt it would significantly affect what was happening, as she said.
They’ve been telling people not to build in these areas because of this risk for more than 50 years before the phrase “climate change” entered the lexicon.
It’s no different than building in a FEMA flood zone then wondering why your million dollar home is under water.
No amount of preparation or environmental management could have mitigated this damage.
That said, don’t put a clown show on TV.
Also, let’s hear the plan to reduce red tape during the rebuild and ensure the availability of building materials without the cost of dry wall tripling in Iowa.
Thanks, I’ll hang up and listen.
It’s no different than building in a FEMA flood zone then wondering why your million dollar home is under water.
No amount of preparation or environmental management could have mitigated this damage.
That said, don’t put a clown show on TV.
Also, let’s hear the plan to reduce red tape during the rebuild and ensure the availability of building materials without the cost of dry wall tripling in Iowa.
Thanks, I’ll hang up and listen.
Some yes, some no. Some were dropped by State Farm due to this risk and some folks didn’t use another carrier or the carrier of last resort. Many will lose everything.
Maybe they had been putting it off for years, and it couldn't be put off any longer.
"Fire season in southern California is generally thought to stretch from May to October - but the state's governor, Gavin Newsom, has pointed out earlier that blazes had become a perennial issue. "There's no fire season," he said. "It's fire year." "
LA fires: What's happening in Los Angeles, and what caused the wildfires?
Everything you need to know about the blazes that have forced thousands to leave their homes.
www.bbc.com
If you are talking about her reading 'url' as a website, yes I saw it. I thought it was a faux pas that shouldn't have been made. But it wasn't unforgivable, as long as they got it up on the screen shortly afterwords.
