Oh, I see. You're saying that to decide if Manning is a good coach and thus was a good hire, we can only look at TU performance and have to ignore anything after? That seems like a pretty silly rule but yes, I agree, from that perspective I am extrapolating from his Wake years to say that he is not a very good coach and thus was not a good hire. That, of course, is based on cold, hard facts and is pretty much irrefutable, I believe. Your view is that, notwithstanding what he's done at Wake, if he had stayed at TU, he would have been rolling in the tournament bids? If so, then he's really dumb to have left because he's sucking it big time at Wake.