ADVERTISEMENT

Did Axios just expose the Kamala Coup-paign?

Every other word is a different conspiracy theory.
Just out of curiosity, what are we currently supposed to believe re: Nordstream(s) I & II? It was Putin?

Or was it Zelenskyy & a group of Ukrainian Special Forces (lol @ UKR SPEC FORCES LMAO what was only a short year or 2 ago a funny oxymoron is now an accurate description of their despicable inclination to force those with special needs & disabilities/mental retardation to the front lines to fight! )

Y’all who support Zelenskyy ought to consider the possibility that Putin is righteous in his defense of ethnic Russians living in Ukraine post-2014!

This is the Democratic Party.

The only thing I can think of that might be just, and lend to innovation in the free market, is to take a few years off of the patent length.(as you mentioned) But you know they will make that up by raising the price while it is still under patent. Nothing comes free. And they would have to change the language of the application to notate the shorter length of patent if taking government aid of any sort. And it can't be applied to former grants & such that did not have that language when given.

But that is not the government 'taking the patent.' That is highway robbery,(slave labor of researchers, and university and private labs) for the government to 'take'/steal a patent. Kamala is showing her true colors here, and inhibiting the free market by championing this type of socialist policy as her agenda. You know she is talking about taking patents with drugs that are already on the market, not future drugs. That is wrong, and highly illegal, despite her insistence that she can do it, if she has the will. She's speaking out of her socialist ass on this. That is very illegal to do without it in the language of grant applications and such, especially in western socialist type governments of the first world. The only countries that pull what she is talking about are dictatorships and third world countries. Not a good look.
Agree. It's a good thing there's a congress.

This is the Democratic Party.

Is it really progress if it remains too expensive for the general public to use for an extremely long period of time?

A wonder drug only available to the rich and famous or which will bankrupt the common patient isn’t something the government should be funding.

I recognize the financial investment required to facilitate innovation and the benefits of that innovation, but it can’t be done at the cost of society’s well being (same thing goes for a space program)
The only thing I can think of that might be just, and lend to innovation in the free market, is to take a few years off of the patent length.(as you mentioned) But you know they will make that up by raising the price while it is still under patent. Nothing comes free. And they would have to change the language of the application to notate the shorter length of patent if taking government aid of any sort. And it can't be applied to former grants & such that did not have that language when given.

But that is not the government 'taking the patent.' That is highway robbery,(slave labor of researchers, and university and private labs) for the government to 'take'/steal a patent. Kamala is showing her true colors here, and inhibiting the free market by championing this type of socialist policy as her agenda. You know she is talking about taking patents with drugs that are already on the market, not future drugs. That is wrong, and highly illegal, despite her insistence that she can do it, if she has the will. She's speaking out of her socialist ass on this. That is very illegal to do without it in the language of grant applications and such, especially in western socialist type governments of the first world. The only countries that pull what she is talking about are dictatorships and third world countries. Not a good look.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT