This is the Democratic Party.
- Crossfire
- 1559 Replies
Is it really progress if it remains too expensive for the general public to use for an extremely long period of time?I thought they were acting as an instigator of progress, not as an investor. If you limit the cost, then you limit the desire to create the product, which is the opposite of an instigator of progress. And that language was not in the application for funding or subsidies that they filled out. It is going against the statutes & regulations for public/govt funding & subsidies.
A wonder drug only available to the rich and famous or which will bankrupt the common patient isn’t something the government should be funding.
I recognize the financial investment required to facilitate innovation and the benefits of that innovation, but it can’t be done at the cost of society’s well being (same thing goes for a space program)