Like I'm going to ignore it if they find it's more widespread. I just don't have suspicions that it is more widespread, until I see evidence. Doesn't matter which party is in power, or which agency has allegations against it.
The supervisor that was fired recently gave an interview stating that the policy of avoiding homes based on perceived political affiliations was also reduced to writing in NC. Put simply, she said she was a patsy for leadership.
In the interview she suggested Congress request specific documents related to the training and supervision of workers in NC which she says contained similar instructions and were circulated throughout NC.
And there may be legs to it. At the time, the Washington Post reported in October that FEMA and the U.S. Forest discontinued service door to door, their typical method, in large parts of NC after claiming in an email to other government agencies, without evidence or any confirmation from DOD or law enforcement, that National Guard personnel encountered “two army trucks of militia who claimed they were out hunting FEMA.”
Both local and federal law enforcement quickly determined these reports to be false.
FEMA to date has not offered an explanation for the publication of the unconfirmed information later determined to be false. Or why door to door service did not resume.
Local commentators have pointed out that these actions make it less likely for some victims to come forward, further breeds government distrust, and reduces the amount of aid injected into the economy to help the public recover.
Which has the same practical effect of skipping doors.
It will be interesting if Congress remains focused on this issue.
This reminds me of the Obama era DHS blunder where they published that absurd report that said because some extremists are veterans, all veterans may be extremists.
