Radicals breeding racism
- Crossfire
- 8 Replies
Why rush to get nato into Ukraine Ukraine serves nato nothing they bring nothing to the table
Did you ever ask yourself why it was 51 Intel chiefs saying Hunter’s laptop was disinformation?If there's any Lithium around, take it.
They’re all fake. All of them. Just like your candidate. I’m thinking of a video that found its way to the internet recently showing Blinkin in some dive bar abroad in Europe (Poland or Kiev maybe) singing a song lol he may have had a guitar or someone else did… you should go find itOne last tidbit of what is not hard to research. What an utter loon you are.
Maurice Blinken, grandfather
Donald Blinken, father
Antony Blinken, Son
SherwinNudelmanNuland, Father
Victoria Nuland, Daughter
If there's any Lithium around, take it.Fuccn crybaby emotional raised by females or wanna be females whole lot of yall that vote D!
Did you get TRIGGERED?! Lmao I swear I can’t stand yall it’s funny I was just telling one of yall fellow comrades how I gets down & accurately predict often what happens both before & after faux news feigning outrage is published… you see, some of us, though honest, good people, we still know a wolf when we see one. That’s why we laugh everytime yall cry wolf
We know what happens when things get real & we laugh at that too cause even when yall run figuratively like some women, yall actually look like women right when you start running & it goes from that to little girl in an instant lmao
Fuccn crybaby emotional raised by females or wanna be females OR JUST PLAIN SOFT THE whole lot of yall that vote D!
One last tidbit of what is not hard to research. What an utter loon you are.If it’s not his father’s proper name, is it his?
Wtf the mental gymnastics I swear… it’s not even close to monopolistic for one, for two IT ISNT FUCCN COVID IT IS DEM RESPONSE TO EVERYTHING KEEP SPENDING KEEP CORRUPTING KEEP REGULATING POWER POWER POWER CONTROLA pandemic certainly does though. Not sure how the law is written but there would be an argument there was still an emergency situation. I would rather see the existing laws modified to included the immediate effects of a national emergency.
All those greedy grocers need to stop ripping off the American people! Hell, I’d be one if there weren’t so many barriers to entry! I’m not talking about the FDA/USDA, or whatever stupid agency that never should’ve been created, though you’ll have to pay me if you want to find out what I consider a personal rule barrier to entry for all markets! Lol here’s hint it’s true for all grocersI don’t support price controls based on their history and limited success elsewhere, but I do think there is a level of regulatory over site that can be a middle ground. The US is not the first western entity to look into price gouging of grocers during this inflationary cycle. I’ve seen articles on the UK, Canada, and France all doing the same.
This is a lie. Not one did.Many Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act. Admittedly not all of them…. There were of course a bunch of blue dog Democrats that would whine that the party left them and turned Republican alongside Reagan.
Back to what?You do realize that there was a time before all these programs came about right?
And the reason they came about was because the charities you espouse weren’t doing nearly enough to actually make a dent in the nation’s problems.
How do you not understand that many of the programs that were put in place were put there to try and address issues that were pervasive? I’m not saying they were all successful in doing so, but just telling the government to “butt out” and going back to the bad situation we were in previously is not the answer.
“We’re not going back, asshole”
I would be agreeing with Time magazine actually that the far right breeding grounds in Ukraine Azov Battallion do not align with Western values. Then again, that was before these traitors went into Russia & committed Acts of Terrror in my name.Yeah, both Blinken's and Nuland's parents were in on this long play scam from the very beginning.
Blinken's father didn't change his name, but Nuland's father did change his name. He changed it from Nudelman to Nuland. It had nothing to do with the name sounding jewish, or him wanting to give his children a name not so easily made fun of for their entire childhood. But he always and truly had this A Blinken & (Vic)Toria Nuland scam at the front of his brain when he changed his name to Nuland. He always knew that she would be a Diplomat when she grew up, and work with A Blinken. It was genius foresight for Blinken's father to name his son Antony, and pick a first or middle name that began with A!!!. Foresight that the 'color revolution/winter' is coming. How could he not know that?!? It was destiny for Russia that it would happen.
I find it amusing how you swallow the whole fish... Hook, line, and sinker included, of a conspiracy theory, so gullibly.
What's really repulsive though is the nuance that you dismiss homosexuality as intolerable, with your implied agreement with Putin.
If it’s not his father’s proper name, is it his?Yeah, both Blinken's and Nuland's parents were in on this long play scam from the very beginning.
Blinken's father didn't change his name, but Nuland's father did change his name. He changed it from Nudelman to Nuland. It had nothing to do with the name sounding jewish, or him wanting to give his children a name not so easily made fun of for their entire childhood. But he always and truly had this A Blinken & (Vic)Toria Nuland scam at the front of his brain when he changed his name to Nuland. He always knew that she would be a Diplomat when she grew up, and work with A Blinken. It was genius foresight for Blinken's father to name his son Antony, and pick a first or middle name that began with A!!!. Foresight that the 'color revolution/winter' is coming. How could he not know that?!? It was destiny for Russia that it would happen.
I find it amusing how you swallow the whole fish... Hook, line, and sinker included, of a conspiracy theory, so gullibly.
What's really repulsive though is the nuance that you dismiss homosexuality as intolerable, with your implied agreement with Putin.
And you believed this?More signs that Sanctions on Russia are starting to bite….
Russian Food Suppliers Warn of Price Hikes Up to 40% - The Moscow Times
Suppliers of bread, dairy, chocolate and beer in Russia have informed retailers of impending price increases of up to 40% over the next month, the business daily Kommersant reported Thursday, citing price-increase notices from at least 13 companies.www.themoscowtimes.com
I have also seen where supposedly 98% of Chinese banks have begun refusing direct payment on notes from Russia under threat if sanctions from the US.
You think it’s been tamed? By who?So, this thread began in May 2021…. 3 years later and it seems somewhat like the inflation monster has been tamed…. There are certainly many hurdles in front of us, but for the time being, the treasury has effectively pumped the brakes on the US economy. I’m now willing to say that the lagged effects from Covid and the geo-economic effects of the Russian incursion into Ukraine have been brought into market balance.
“Transitory” is a subjective term I suppose.
Reminds me of FRED data chart depicting when Biden decided to add savings accounts to the M1 money supply.
Just out of curiosity, what are we currently supposed to believe re: Nordstream(s) I & II? It was Putin?Every other word is a different conspiracy theory.
Really? I didn’t know. The term “conspiracy theory” & “conspiracy theorist” was identified by the CIA as an effective way to discredit whistleblowers decades ago.Every other word is a different conspiracy theory.
Agree. It's a good thing there's a congress.The only thing I can think of that might be just, and lend to innovation in the free market, is to take a few years off of the patent length.(as you mentioned) But you know they will make that up by raising the price while it is still under patent. Nothing comes free. And they would have to change the language of the application to notate the shorter length of patent if taking government aid of any sort. And it can't be applied to former grants & such that did not have that language when given.
But that is not the government 'taking the patent.' That is highway robbery,(slave labor of researchers, and university and private labs) for the government to 'take'/steal a patent. Kamala is showing her true colors here, and inhibiting the free market by championing this type of socialist policy as her agenda. You know she is talking about taking patents with drugs that are already on the market, not future drugs. That is wrong, and highly illegal, despite her insistence that she can do it, if she has the will. She's speaking out of her socialist ass on this. That is very illegal to do without it in the language of grant applications and such, especially in western socialist type governments of the first world. The only countries that pull what she is talking about are dictatorships and third world countries. Not a good look.
The only thing I can think of that might be just, and lend to innovation in the free market, is to take a few years off of the patent length.(as you mentioned) But you know they will make that up by raising the price while it is still under patent. Nothing comes free. And they would have to change the language of the application to notate the shorter length of patent if taking government aid of any sort. And it can't be applied to former grants & such that did not have that language when given.Is it really progress if it remains too expensive for the general public to use for an extremely long period of time?
A wonder drug only available to the rich and famous or which will bankrupt the common patient isn’t something the government should be funding.
I recognize the financial investment required to facilitate innovation and the benefits of that innovation, but it can’t be done at the cost of society’s well being (same thing goes for a space program)
You are taking advantage of this government study grant that the government shouldn't be funding. That should be left to charities to take care of the cost.I'm on a drug that costs $6,000,00 /mth. I get it free through a Study Grant.
lol. Thats my point. What happens when the study is over?I'm on a drug that costs $6,000,00 /mth. I get it free through a Study Grant.
Is it really progress if it remains too expensive for the general public to use for an extremely long period of time?I thought they were acting as an instigator of progress, not as an investor. If you limit the cost, then you limit the desire to create the product, which is the opposite of an instigator of progress. And that language was not in the application for funding or subsidies that they filled out. It is going against the statutes & regulations for public/govt funding & subsidies.