I’m curious what your thought (or anyone else here) is on whether intent should be considered or not?They need to make such plays subjective to post game review and multiple game suspension.
Yes, intent should be considered even though it's very difficult to disseminate. If it's a repeated infraction that is identified over time, created by poor technique or not, then it should be dealt with and the player should adjust.I’m curious what your thought (or anyone else here) is on whether intent should be considered or not?
I mention this only because, based on the interview, Zaven felt that it was a freak accident and not malicious. On the flip side he could’ve lost his eye from what I understand.
How many seasons of video replay do we get to review and determine just how screwed you are….If intent after the fact is the name of the game, I'm basically screwed.
There’s a STATUE of limitations!How many seasons of video replay do we get to review and determine just how screwed you are….
Lucky for most of us!There’s a STATUE of limitations!
And before social mediaLucky for most of us!
Lucky for most of us!
Not everyone is allowed to see the Statue because their are limitations 😉Where is this STATUE located?
Is that concrete evidence? Granite, Im not very learned on the subject..marble, marble not?Not everyone is allowed to see the Statue because their are limitations 😉
There has been a group gathering outside the fence yelling to take down the statue.Is that concrete evidence? Granite, Im not very learned on the subject..marble, marble not?
With LEC it may have been plaster(ed) 😀Is that concrete evidence? Granite, Im not very learned on the subject..marble, marble not?
It's true. I prefer plaster(ed) to sheet rock.With LEC it may have been plaster(ed) 😀
Old school.It's true. I prefer plaster(ed) to sheet rock.