Wynalda is a prick and almost a nihilist. I am tired of listening to Landon Donovan talking about commitment when that guy took a year off before the World Cup and then demanded to be back on the team. That is a trumpian level of hypocrisy.
"The best players we have are playing in Sunday leagues across the country." He said this. That is an utter line of complete and total BS.
I laughed at the because they had accents comment. That was much worse back in the day. Parents had no idea who was good or not because they knew nothing about soccer. Now, many of us have played at a decent level and are a little more discerning. He is a little too mean about coming and going. Some want a change of scenery or to marry an American. It is a little more complex. Tulsa had some exceptional coaching around because of the NASL Roughnecks that hung around. Some of those individuals, such as Alan Woodward, played significant roles in huge leagues. He is still the second all-time leading scorer at Sheffield United.
But some need a shot.
Look, David Critchley is the head coach of Saint Louis SC. He is a British national who played at Oklahoma Wesleyan, coached at NEOFC, transitioned to an MLS Academy for SLSC, and is now in their interim head coaching position at SLSC. He has got some pretty decent reviews in the first couple of games. But the first couple of places would fall under Wynalda's criticism of playing overseas.
Guess what? The MLS pay is also improving significantly.
He decries the lack of ODP.. Did he mention that 30 MLS teams don't pay, but that isn't until 13? Guess what? ODP didn't exist until around 13, too. Are we missing kids from South Dakota, North Dakota, Maine, or Montana due to the lack of ODP? No they sucked. Everyone believed they were strongly biased towards CA, TX, NJ and NY. And, heck, the MLS teams will even pay for kids to move and live there now.
Older people become old and bitter.
Some of the things are accurate. There used to be one team and fewer clubs. True about one team. Wrong about fewer clubs. Now we probably have about the same or less. They are just bigger because more kids are playing. However, some of the teams are just glorified rec teams. Some kids start lower and grow. Lawpoke testifies about this with his daughter. I have seen this too.
The ones who love it and want to improve will work outside their practices. If they play with the top teams, they will be at a significant disadvantage. They will make the top kids weaker, and they will get discouraged. Solving that problem is difficult. I think you give the kids who are showing up a chance to play here and there. If they show signs of success, you give them a shot. It is hard at the younger ages. Parents come in from the YMCA or other recreational leagues and say, 'My kid scored a lot of goals, but the skills, speed and knowledge are very different here. ' Now, they go in and get smoked. Some improve. Others don't. That is the nature of the beast.
Back in the day, "We knew everyone great... Steve XYZ. That is accurate. I have spoken to several children who don't seem to understand the other children at a high school. It seems weird to me. Back in the day, we played Union, BA, Jenks, and Bishop Kelly. We knew exactly who we needed to deal with. We all played against each other since the age of 10, and often played against one another. BA could still stock a team full of the best kids. In 4A (all teams, not in 6A (5A then) were in 4A, you were fortunate to have a full squad of competitive players. Even if the competitive players were not notable, they were still a step up from the rec or kids who had never even touched a ball.
"Sunday leagues", where Wynalda believes that the real talent exists. I didn't know where those mysterious Sunday league players he believed came from. That sounds nice. But in actuality he is full of

. Perhaps it's because he had success with the US Open team from California a few years ago, and a few were "Sunday league guys"
Now, the NL kids never play against the ECNL-RL, OPL NPL, GA, BA, or MLS-Next kids, so they have no idea who those players are. We did have some different-level competitive leagues; I forget the names. The top kids might be spread across 2-3 teams in an age group. In my age group, three different teams in Tulsa have placed multiple kids in D1 schools, as well as numerous D2 and NAIA schools. So is that really that different? N. I would have liked to see WSA, Blitz, and TSC play each other, but they all play in various leagues. You can say it's for political reasons, but it's a little more complicated due to the nature of the leagues. There have been some powerful teams from WSA or Blitz, in particular, in a specific age group. They had some good players, but they just weren't as good across the board. If you think otherwise, you are just ig orant.
Sure, a game in a tournament might have been 1-0, 2-0, or 2-1, but if you watch the game, you know this. It is the same sort of reason you see T inidad or Nicaragua beat the US or Mexico from time to time.
That is because soccer is so tiered now that the competition doesn't see each other. Side note, the top kids are already learning from each other from OKC and Tulsa. At my son's age, they are learning to despise Edmon. I don't think they like us either. I told my son that I dislike only grocery stores. We hated Celtic (yes, they were the best squad in OKC) and the Royals back in the day, and that hatred only grew stronger from playing against them from the age of 1. That's starting at six now.
In Oklahoma, the ODP All-State kids are typically ECNL-NL kids, with a few exceptions. The top leagues attract the top talent, even if you dislike Barry or the coach in an age group. In OK, ECNL-NL is similar to ODP Oklahoma East and West, except that it also includes kids from Northwest Arkansas and southern Kansas who travel to participate. Initially, there was an east-west dichotomy in organisational development (OD). You were chosen here, then you trained with the West Side kids, and ultimately, they picked you for the all-state team. I know that was what happened. I played in it. It was mostly the top KD. Where does the vast majority of the D1 talent come from in O? Those are the ECNL-NL. If there are others, it's rare. It is just a basic stat. There are peopl are completely self-ab orbed about their kids talent levels, bitching about politics at the club because they are not playing. And hell, it might be. Guess what, the vast majority is not the case.
In actuality, their kid just wasn't as good as they thought. They are too proud to admit it, too ignorant to realise, or lack the patience to work to prove themselves. When you start playing at those levels, it is, really, really cutthroat.
Many of the people that bitch don't have children or are even around the youth soccer. Or I think their kid sucked, and they are bitter about that too.
We are examining the failures of the US team and the rest of MLS. The MLS is better than it used to be. I is a function of the academies.
The USMNT has different problems—no need to go into that here.
The players are more talented. Remember when we were excited that Alex Lalas played for Padova for two years, while also being in his rock band? America had arrived!!!! Now, we wouldn't even be a national headline.
For whatever reason, this has not translated into national team success like Americans expect. It is one of the few sports in which we don't excel. Part of that is that it is the most competitive sport in the world due to the large number of people who participate in it. Americans don't like that. Where is the critic's view on Tennis? American men haven't done anything for years. The last truly great male players were Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi. The US loses a lot at the Ryder Cup. Who isn't crying?
I have grown tired of listening to people bitch about pay-to-play. Soccer is the most prominent sport that is constantly discussed. Guess what? Every US sport, except perhaps football, is already there. In this direction, football is now adopting 7-on-7 formats, and players and parents are investing in offseason training to improve agility and speed.
Have you ever heard about the high costs associated with becoming a NASCAR driver, baseball player, or gymnast? Not nearly to the level of the announcer's whining on TV because we lost a particular game. It's because some of the announcers are atrocious. Being a good player doesn't necessarily make you a good coach or announcer.
These people come with ZERO solutions, or they are hilariously bad. Wynalda does say this and says it isn't going away.
Sorry if my thoughts are disjointed. This brain puke reflects my agreement and disagreement with Wynalda, as well as my effort to be nuanced.
Wynalda is just an old hag. I loved him as a player, though.
PS. God, that was a long type.