To be fair most cheap stuff tasted like swill. It was just whatever you got used to and could put away a lot of. That was Keystone for me. 2x case race champ.I could never get on board with keystone. Just didn’t taste right.
To be fair most cheap stuff tasted like swill. It was just whatever you got used to and could put away a lot of. That was Keystone for me. 2x case race champ.I could never get on board with keystone. Just didn’t taste right.
I feel like there's a firetruck somewhere you should be spitshining right now.
To be fair most cheap stuff tasted like swill. It was just whatever you got used to and could put away a lot of. That was Keystone for me. 2x case race champ.
My biggest qualm with the other houses wasn't the beer differences. It was the beer pong rule differences. I saw some crap tendencies being brought from other houses. It's a gentleman's game, treat it like one.Well I suppose after 6 or so it didn’t matter anymore. As long as it was cold and yellow, I’d drink it.
My biggest qualm with the other houses wasn't the beer differences. It was the beer pong rule differences. I saw some crap tendencies being brought from other houses. It's a gentleman's game, treat it like one.
[cheers]Went back to an alumni event a while back and it’s VERY different than we played. Each house had their “rules” though. Some were indeed weird
I'm not sure what most folks drank in some of the other houses... but I only saw Natty Light among the KA's that I can recall. I was there later than you though.TU wasn't a Keystone Light school like OU and OSU were in the mid 2000s....luckily we had QT that ran specials on other beers.
It's more about the sustained success. Listen, no one is happy with the results of the last two years. So much of it is on QB play. This year we literally had a better OL, better RBs and a better defense than we did in 2016. Yet, without high level QB play, it doesn't matter.
After Bill, Monty had a good amount of upperclassmen to work with. But the numbers were way down from Bill's last two recruiting classes. This happens a lot in coaching changes and is completely understandable.... It's not an indictment on Blank. The players that were there in those thin years of numbers were decent players. But after Dane, there was quite the drop off in QB talent. We all understand that Monty is a QB-guy and it was his job to find the replacement after Dane, and I am sure he takes responsibility for that.
But Now Monty has the overall numbers back up and we got a lot of good players at every position. WR needs improving. Seth played his best two games in the last two. Developed well, just needed to start since Game 1 to really see where he would be at. And what everyone knows is that Zach Smith will be eligible next year. Seth gives a viable competition in the offseason. Regardless of who will be the QB, you will either have an improved Seth Boomer, or a high level Zach Smith. And a good back up will be present.
Think about this, we will have 2 QBs on the roster next year that will be head and shoulders better than what TU has had in 2017 and 2018.
It's real simple, we dodge a bullet when Monty has two bad seasons when 2 big time jobs that would have snatched him up came open, Arkansas and Texas Tech. Monty will win 7-9 games next year and there might not be a job he wants.
Also think about this for those who think Monty is overpaid. He took a paycut and his salary is in the $1.2-$1.3m range.
1. They won't give him the budget to hire an OC. So that saves TU about $300K.
2. They haven't increased the budget for Football Ops since 2012 (Lowest in the conference by far). Monty took the salary pay cut to ensure the budget would not be cut. Also keep in mind that TU is dead last in facilities in the conference and it's not even close. TU would be in the middle of the pack with facilities in C-USA and Sun Belt. That's just facts. I have seen campuses in all conferences over the last 6 months. It's sad.
3. When TU added the 10th assistant last year, they didn't give Monty anymore $$$ to hire a guy. So if you read between the lines, it's not far fetched to see that Monty is subsidizing the 10th assistant.
So add it up, if you promote someone to OC and you pay the 10th assistant out of the budget, Monty is basically the TU head coach for about $850K-$900K.
And if he gets things rolling next year, that is a bargain.
-Austin Chadwick
OK, I can buy that.I like points per possession. Takes into account those schools running fast offenses where the defense is on the field for more possessions than say a ball control offense.
Tulane continues to improve, just fired their OC because he wasn't getting it done, and has a bowl game to build on. Monty is .500 against them and lost the last two including an embarrassment last time in New Orleans.
And it's funny that Keystone is basically watered down Coors/Coors LightI could never get on board with keystone. Just didn’t taste right.
Coors Lite was a backup... not enough difference for the slightly higher price.And it's funny that Keystone is basically watered down Coors/Coors Light
And it's funny that Keystone is basically watered down Coors/Coors Light
Yeah. I think I'll take Austin's opinion over yours. You'll argue with anyone, no matter their expertise. I assume you know who Austin is, but it certainly isn't obvious from your post.I refer you to the capital gazette article about Navy for facilities and budget items.
I will also point out this is four years now of the QB excuse. Several schools in our conference have had grad transfer QBs come in. The coach has failed and it is on him.
Next year the schedule will be even harder and the chance of us having a 1 win season is high.
Houston will be better than us and likely competing for a ny6 bowl.
UCF will be better than us and likely competing for a ny6 bowl.
Cincy will be younger and better than us and likely competing for a ny6 bowl.
Memphis will be better than us.
Michigan St will be a monster next year and compete for a division and B1G championship.
OSU is likely a 9-10 win team next year.
Tulane continues to improve, just fired their OC because he wasn't getting it done, and has a bowl game to build on. Monty is .500 against them and lost the last two including an embarrassment last time in New Orleans.
Navy will be Navy and I doubt we will be favored.
SMU in Dallas is always tough on Tulsa, Dykes will be in his second year and their schedule isn't quite as tough.
Wyoming could be winnable at home, but they will bring back a good bit and are bowl eligible this year.
San Jose St is terrible but when was the last time we won on the road? A trip to Northern California isn't exactly a short one either.
ECU may have a new coach but definitely have a killer recruiting class and a freshman hometown QB lighting people up.
That's 8-10 losses and an 0-12 season is as likely as 8-9 wins. There is no evidence to support the claim that Monty will make it all better next year. His offensive trends have been down and we have been through three of his just wait for so and so QB's, it seems unlikely number four will be different.
This seems fitting for some reason.I know - but it just doesn’t work for me for some reason. I love me some coors.
I think the three gurus of the HUNH offense may have figured out that, at the college level, it puts too much pressure on their own defense; the defense is just on the field too much.
You had plenty of time to write the check to get this done, to make Monty gone. But you didn’t do it. I hold you personally responsible for our failure next year. I’m starting a jihad on you if we lose next year.I refer you to the capital gazette article about Navy for facilities and budget items.
I will also point out this is four years now of the QB excuse. Several schools in our conference have had grad transfer QBs come in. The coach has failed and it is on him.
Next year the schedule will be even harder and the chance of us having a 1 win season is high.
Houston will be better than us and likely competing for a ny6 bowl.
UCF will be better than us and likely competing for a ny6 bowl.
Cincy will be younger and better than us and likely competing for a ny6 bowl.
Memphis will be better than us.
Michigan St will be a monster next year and compete for a division and B1G championship.
OSU is likely a 9-10 win team next year.
Tulane continues to improve, just fired their OC because he wasn't getting it done, and has a bowl game to build on. Monty is .500 against them and lost the last two including an embarrassment last time in New Orleans.
Navy will be Navy and I doubt we will be favored.
SMU in Dallas is always tough on Tulsa, Dykes will be in his second year and their schedule isn't quite as tough.
Wyoming could be winnable at home, but they will bring back a good bit and are bowl eligible this year.
San Jose St is terrible but when was the last time we won on the road? A trip to Northern California isn't exactly a short one either.
ECU may have a new coach but definitely have a killer recruiting class and a freshman hometown QB lighting people up.
That's 8-10 losses and an 0-12 season is as likely as 8-9 wins. There is no evidence to support the claim that Monty will make it all better next year. His offensive trends have been down and we have been through three of his just wait for so and so QB's, it seems unlikely number four will be different.
4-5 wins is the nightmare scenario."Four years of QB excuses"? Huh? That doesn't make any sense.
Outside of that, I totally understand your opinion.
Let's go over your analysis on the teams. However, the schedule definitely does not get harder next year.
Houston: Houston loses 7 seniors and and 8th in Oliver on defense next year. Applewhite has not recruited near to the level of Herman and even Sumlin before then. We always play Houston well. Got them at home next year.
UCF: Loses 15 starters that were all Frost's guys. And their 4 best players. They will be talented, but they will definitely lose a handful of games next year.
Cincinnati: Started 7 Seniors on defense. Definitely a decent team coming into next year, they will not be a 10 win team like they were this year.
Memphis: Tigers will be decent, but definitely beatable. A lot like they were in 2016. Probably about like they were this year. I know Norvell well. Even though they make a conference final this year, they aren't happy with him in Memphis. Next year they ill be good offensively, but worse on defense.
Michigan State: Was awful this year, should have another loss to Utah State. They need a QB and there isn't one in sight yet. But that's a game we will probably lose.
OSU: Loss
Tulane: Better, but definitely not an 8-win Tulane team next year or anything like that. Depending on how TU starts, they will probably be favored.
ECU: Will be the worst team in the conference.
Navy: Needs a QB. Will get thumped by Army this weekend.
Here is the point I am making, TU will definitely have to play well. But keep in mind that in 2016, out of 13 games, TU was favored in 6 of them. Won 10.
The team overall will improve at every position except OL. And I ain't worried there because Bloesch is one of the best young coaches in the country at OL. Tulsa gave up 47 sacks this year. And when all counted up, 29 of them were on the QB/RB. But that doesn't matter. Nobody wants to hear excuses. On the bright side we return 9 starters on a good defense, 7 on offense, and the team has numbers, depth, etc.
If you have attended any scrimmages or practices, you will see the level that Zach Smith plays at. I've seen all QBs at TU, and Smith has the best arm talent since Gus Frerotte. Plain and simple. It's pretty special. Either he wins the job, or Boomer is good enough to win it.
I fully understand your concerns and that you think TU will be no good next year, I would be too if I hadn't seen Zach Smith or believed that Boomer can't continue his progression.
I thought Bill deserved a 5th year after two bad ones, but his contract was so cheap, it was easy to buy him out. I believe Monty deserves a 5th year and so much will hinge on the QB play. If they get good play, they will win 6-9 games next year, if not, they will win 3-5 games.
4-5 wins is the nightmare scenario.
You had plenty of time to write the check to get this done, to make Monty gone. But you didn’t do it. I hold you personally responsible for our failure next year. I’m starting a jihad on you if we lose next year.
"Four years of QB excuses"? Huh? That doesn't make any sense.
Outside of that, I totally understand your opinion.
Let's go over your analysis on the teams. However, the schedule definitely does not get harder next year.
Houston: Houston loses 7 seniors and and 8th in Oliver on defense next year. Applewhite has not recruited near to the level of Herman and even Sumlin before then. We always play Houston well. Got them at home next year.
UCF: Loses 15 starters that were all Frost's guys. And their 4 best players. They will be talented, but they will definitely lose a handful of games next year.
Cincinnati: Started 7 Seniors on defense. Definitely a decent team coming into next year, they will not be a 10 win team like they were this year.
Memphis: Tigers will be decent, but definitely beatable. A lot like they were in 2016. Probably about like they were this year. I know Norvell well. Even though they make a conference final this year, they aren't happy with him in Memphis. Next year they ill be good offensively, but worse on defense.
Michigan State: Was awful this year, should have another loss to Utah State. They need a QB and there isn't one in sight yet. But that's a game we will probably lose.
OSU: Loss
Tulane: Better, but definitely not an 8-win Tulane team next year or anything like that. Depending on how TU starts, they will probably be favored.
ECU: Will be the worst team in the conference.
Navy: Needs a QB. Will get thumped by Army this weekend.
Here is the point I am making, TU will definitely have to play well. But keep in mind that in 2016, out of 13 games, TU was favored in 6 of them. Won 10.
The team overall will improve at every position except OL. And I ain't worried there because Bloesch is one of the best young coaches in the country at OL. Tulsa gave up 47 sacks this year. And when all counted up, 29 of them were on the QB/RB. But that doesn't matter. Nobody wants to hear excuses. On the bright side we return 9 starters on a good defense, 7 on offense, and the team has numbers, depth, etc.
If you have attended any scrimmages or practices, you will see the level that Zach Smith plays at. I've seen all QBs at TU, and Smith has the best arm talent since Gus Frerotte. Plain and simple. It's pretty special. Either he wins the job, or Boomer is good enough to win it.
I fully understand your concerns and that you think TU will be no good next year, I would be too if I hadn't seen Zach Smith or believed that Boomer can't continue his progression.
I thought Bill deserved a 5th year after two bad ones, but his contract was so cheap, it was easy to buy him out. I believe Monty deserves a 5th year and so much will hinge on the QB play. If they get good play, they will win 6-9 games next year, if not, they will win 3-5 games.
You had plenty of time to write the check to get this done, to make Monty gone. But you didn’t do it. I hold you personally responsible for our failure next year. I’m starting a jihad on you if we lose next year.
Here is the point I am making, TU will definitely have to play well. But keep in mind that in 2016, out of 13 games, TU was favored in 6 of them. Won 10.
I actually don’t think we disagree. I just don’t whine incessantly about things that can’t be changed. And I’m not histrionic. But that’s a personality difference not a disagreement.Aww you're trying to be cute and deflect from just how much money this decision could cost Tulsa in the long run.
The nightmare scenario is firing him five winless games into the season, having an interim, slim future options and an apathetic fanbase who won't respond.
I blame people who make excuses for people who have horrible job evaluations. He won more games in either of his first two seasons than the total he has won with his players the last two years.
We just completely disagree on this. It happens.
I actually don’t think we disagree. I just don’t whine incessantly about things that can’t be changed. And I’m not histrionic. But that’s a personality difference not a disagreement.
I know it’s THE situation no matter how much we whine about it.Oh? Perhaps you don't know the definition of disagreement, much as you didn't for jihad?
You believe this is the best scenario for this program.
I know it is not.
The issue is the athletic director who thinks being a good person is the evaluation criteria for a coach not wins and losses.
I know it’s THE situation no matter how much we whine about it.
Whether it’s the best situation depends on what the alternatives are. We’d all love a $500m donation and to hire Nick Saban. But what are the real alternatives? I suspect if we ponied up to fire Monty we’d end up with someone even less qualified and on a longer contract. That I think is even worse in both regards. So of the available options this is probably the best. Sometimes life gives you the choice of two bad alternatives and you have to suck it up and move forward. It’s called being a grown up. You can gnash your teeth and curse the gods about cruel fate, and dream bitterly of the glory just beyond our grasp but it won’t change the real options we have. ]Makin decisions without maturely understanding the alternatives on the other side is a recipe for bad decisions.
I’ve said over and over that I think the athletic director is where all the problems start. That’s where the first change should happen. Firing Monty while Gragg is charge is useless.
Good post. I don't think everything that went poorly this year is on the QB position though. Boomer showed he is capable of running a quicker pace, being accurate, etc. when the defense can't tee off because they know every play that is coming. I gushed over the 2 TE sets on Saturday because it is not something we've seen at all this year. Deep slants and crosses. 1st time all year for a lot of those routes. WRs holding onto balls.Simply put, the play calling was at a level to keep the defense off balance. That is the part that needs to be there next year. A lot of us firmly believe there is plenty of talent at the skilled positions to score 30-35 ppg. With the defense that is returning, that should be good enough for 6-7 wins and possibly more if they get a break in some of those other games."Four years of QB excuses"? Huh? That doesn't make any sense.
Outside of that, I totally understand your opinion.
Let's go over your analysis on the teams. However, the schedule definitely does not get harder next year.
Houston: Houston loses 7 seniors and and 8th in Oliver on defense next year. Applewhite has not recruited near to the level of Herman and even Sumlin before then. We always play Houston well. Got them at home next year.
UCF: Loses 15 starters that were all Frost's guys. And their 4 best players. They will be talented, but they will definitely lose a handful of games next year.
Cincinnati: Started 7 Seniors on defense. Definitely a decent team coming into next year, they will not be a 10 win team like they were this year.
Memphis: Tigers will be decent, but definitely beatable. A lot like they were in 2016. Probably about like they were this year. I know Norvell well. Even though they make a conference final this year, they aren't happy with him in Memphis. Next year they ill be good offensively, but worse on defense.
Michigan State: Was awful this year, should have another loss to Utah State. They need a QB and there isn't one in sight yet. But that's a game we will probably lose.
OSU: Loss
Tulane: Better, but definitely not an 8-win Tulane team next year or anything like that. Depending on how TU starts, they will probably be favored.
ECU: Will be the worst team in the conference.
Navy: Needs a QB. Will get thumped by Army this weekend.
Here is the point I am making, TU will definitely have to play well. But keep in mind that in 2016, out of 13 games, TU was favored in 6 of them. Won 10.
The team overall will improve at every position except OL. And I ain't worried there because Bloesch is one of the best young coaches in the country at OL. Tulsa gave up 47 sacks this year. And when all counted up, 29 of them were on the QB/RB. But that doesn't matter. Nobody wants to hear excuses. On the bright side we return 9 starters on a good defense, 7 on offense, and the team has numbers, depth, etc.
If you have attended any scrimmages or practices, you will see the level that Zach Smith plays at. I've seen all QBs at TU, and Smith has the best arm talent since Gus Frerotte. Plain and simple. It's pretty special. Either he wins the job, or Boomer is good enough to win it.
I fully understand your concerns and that you think TU will be no good next year, I would be too if I hadn't seen Zach Smith or believed that Boomer can't continue his progression.
I thought Bill deserved a 5th year after two bad ones, but his contract was so cheap, it was easy to buy him out. I believe Monty deserves a 5th year and so much will hinge on the QB play. If they get good play, they will win 6-9 games next year, if not, they will win 3-5 games.
I would probably agree.
Careful GH2, Goldie has been spotted around campus these winter evenings hiking her rear leg.(although it might be better than Keystone)Well I suppose after 6 or so it didn’t matter anymore. As long as it was cold and yellow, I’d drink it.
Careful GH2, Goldie has been spotted around campus these winter evenings hiking her rear leg.(although it might be better than Keystone)