That's not what disenfranchisement means. Also, that's not a real problem.
No, but that's the GOP playbook. Holler and scream about it until it must be true and the dumb asses who won't actually bother to go look up actual information take it as the gospel truth because...well, Hannity repeated it on FoxNews so it must be the equivalent of the gospel.
Wishful thinking by Kanye.
Way to play the race card... and, no it's not. My point was that it wasn't JUST black people that were being targeted for disenfranchisement and that people were being targeted individually to try and prevent them from voting based on their data habits. It probably had just as much to do with their education level and their income as it did with their race.
Good luck. He'd have to increase his share of black voters 15% to get to that. Not going to happen, especially if you look at his approval rating with that demographic.
This is the guy who filed that lawsuit...
Cool stuff. I still doubt it’s validity.
Wait, you mean trying to end DACA for no reason than to eliminate individuals who might vote against him from the population. Having BLM declared a "terrorist" organization while not doing the same for Proud Boys, KKK, and Neo-Nazis of America, as well as the NOT REGULATED so-called militia boys with big guns and little dicks. Banning Muslims from entering the country and using the feeble excuse of terrorism as the reason WHILE still allowing individuals from Saudi Arabia to still enter even though it is well documented that country helped fund, harbor, and support the 9/11 attacks. Insisting the Central Park 5 are guilty despite evidence to the contrary and the individuals being exonerated. Birtherism and his attitude towards Obama- you do realize Trump is the one who kicked off the idea that being an overt racist in this country is OK. Should I go on?
When you say "vote harvesting" do you mean the Dem party is helping eligible voters who might not otherwise be able to vote because their local precinct was shut down, secure absentee ballots? You do realize half of the lawsuits alleging voter fraud are brought by individuals who think Alex Jones is a sane and decent person. In Texas these same people continue to argue that Texas was illegally annexed by the US and tout Texas independence (and any sane person knows TX BEGGED the US to accept it as a state because their economy as a nation was floundering AND they feared Mexican forces were gearing up for a reclamation attack. The teach Texas history in TX but the usually leave out the dark stuff in the 9 years they were an independent nation, just like Oklahoma loves to teach all about the land run but not the part where the US encouraged it to further drive the indigenous peoples they forced here further into infertile and unsupportive lands. Want to review history, really the only state that would have a legitimate claim of illegal annexation, sans the arguments of the indigenous peoples were here first before European invasion, is Hawaii. US history is pretty sordid and again, the dark stuff is conveniently left out in the teaching of it unless it's giant and huge like slavery and the Civil War, etc.) Hell even today, the SCOTUS nominee believes women should fully obey and submit to the will and judgement of their husbands as some sort of religious duty.
Those are not opinions, those are matters of fact. POTUS did indeed do all of those things during his tenure, all directed at POC without directing the same questions or policy to white individuals/groups involved in the same behavior/protests. Very definition of racism....treating individuals/groups differently based on the color of their skin.
This didn't age well. In the circus of a debate last night, Trump refused to condemn white supremacy and white supremacist groups, even at one point, seemingly urging action from Proud Boys.
That’s because Antifa isn’t starting all of this crap. Antifa is a reaction to these far right groups. Antifa by and large isn’t instigating things.
And antifa is an organized group as much as it is an idea.
You don't find it fishy that the notary is related to the person giving the affadavit?
Funny how GOP only bitch about voter fraud when it comes to minorities voting or populations they perceive will vote Dem, yet say nothing of the actual documented efforts of the Kremlin to interfere in our voting process...regardless of whether or not the Trump campaign involved them. It is indisputable that Russia hacked our system in 2016 and Homeland Security and the national security team are advising they are seeing that activity again. Yet the GOP Senate won't even look at the bill to ensure the security of our elections. And now national security briefings have stopped when it comes to what they're finding out for both candidates because if Biden knows what's going on you know it's going public.
So how did your long and a bit rambling post respond to my rather simple post?
I wasn't necessarily directing this at you or accusing you. It was more of an add on and a point that the ones crying the most about "voter fraud" are also the ones who have turned a blind eye to the other side of interfering in and affecting the outcomes of our elections.
Agree somewhat, but there are bright minds at work with cyber security and many of them used to come from TU. You can secure anything you want if you really want to. The security issue would be the inside jobs. I am talking more a point of convenience.
There are just too many points of vulnerability with an electronic system, combined with too much benefit for cyber crime en-masse. The benefits of learning how to remotely hack a couple systems is very much worth it for China or Russia, vs having to maintain an international espionage ring operating in multiple states and keep it secret. I was good friends and actually roommates a several cyber corps members and I don't think any of them would argue much differently. The first video was published by a channel that specializes in computer science (both security and development) and regularly hosts many respected computer science professionals and professors. My problem isn't with the counting machines themselves; because, like paper ballot fraud it becomes pretty hard to scale physical hacks on machines (even by inserting a USB or something). My problem is that we have a lack of public (and congressional) support for extremely high security placed on the transmission of results from precincts and the security of the databases that the results are conglomerated in. Those are the places most vulnerable for mass-changes. It's almost like we need a monitored, closed-loop election network that doesn't use or allow connections to the internet or any unknown computers. I'd actually be more comfortable with numbers being hand counted and faxed on a piece of paper to a central counting agency in every state where they could then be hand tabulated by multiple observed accountants.
