I can hear the announcers in the booth. ”Let’s just shorten this to “king””.If King comes here and ends up a starter we need to get James Earl-Jones to announce him in the starting line-up. "KING ANI: SON OF MAKHULU"
I can hear the announcers in the booth. ”Let’s just shorten this to “king””.If King comes here and ends up a starter we need to get James Earl-Jones to announce him in the starting line-up. "KING ANI: SON OF MAKHULU"
Yeah. We will see. Jerry Schmidt is running a lot of guys out of that program in the last few weeks.
One more OL, and we can have Christmas in July.
Christ. We now have like 25 RB's and the bare minimum OL.
I reported this a couple weeks ago in Hurricane Alley. I may have even mentioned it in our last recruiting update on the front page, along with Miami OL Kai-Leon Herbert.SIAP
Tautai Li'o Marks - Football - Colorado State Athletics
Tautai Li'o Marks (65) Offensive Line - 2020 (Fr.) | 0/0: Redshirted HS/Misc.: Coached by Bruce Rollinson ... Three-star composite recruit by 247Sports, rank...csurams.com
I don't know that I've hyped any of them, as the majority have little on-field experience, which I pointed out in one of my recent recruiting articles. If you look at the five OL transfers, I don't know that they have a full season's worth of experience between them. There is a lot of potential there, and they will need to gel with the group and come together as a unit this summer and fall.Either Chris is an excellent hype guy, or it seems to me we're getting better players interested in coming to Tulsa than I can recall in years prior (or it could be both).
Correct. P5 teams may have off loaded some OL weight. The test will be whether that’s iron or lead.I don't know that I've hyped any of them, as the majority have little on-field experience, which I pointed out in one of my recent recruiting articles. If you look at the five OL transfers, I don't know that they have a full season's worth of experience between them. There is a lot of potential there, and they will need to gel with the group and come together as a unit this summer and fall.
I believe I read somewhere that going high in the draft has a lot to do with marketing. How well do you try to sell the player. Something along those lines.Is Tulsa getting better transfers than the other teams in the AAC? Either Chris is an excellent hype guy, or it seems to me we're getting better players interested in coming to Tulsa than I can recall in years prior (or it could be both). I want to believe that TU having 2 first round draft pics in the NFL the past 2 years has put our program in the limelight; resulting in better players, because it can't be due to NIL monies being used to entice them through endorsements... Tulsa is going to lose the bribery battle to teams with rich boosters and packed stadiums for games on Saturdays.
As much as Marks seemed to be an afterthought as far as when we got him, and his qualifications go, I am really glad we got Marks. Him Simpson, & Herbert are our only transfers on OL, that we have utilized in the main rotation. He has filled in nicely at RG & helped out at center, while Farniok has been down.SIAP
Tautai Li'o Marks - Football - Colorado State Athletics
Tautai Li'o Marks (65) Offensive Line - 2020 (Fr.) | 0/0: Redshirted HS/Misc.: Coached by Bruce Rollinson ... Three-star composite recruit by 247Sports, rank...csurams.com
I really think Montgomery did pretty good in the portal this year with Epps and Marks.As much as Marks seemed to be an afterthought as far as when we got him, and his qualifications go, I am really glad we got Marks. Him Simpson, & Herbert are our only transfers on OL, that we have utilized in the main rotation. He has filled in nicely at RG & helped out at center, while Farniok has been down.
Yeah, and Gary, Herbert, Simpson, and Simon have contributed. Not a bad haul.I really think Montgomery did pretty good in the portal this year with Epps and Marks.
I still think this may be Monty's strong suit... if the admin will help the transfer processI really think Montgomery did pretty good in the portal this year with Epps and Marks.
6 out of 14 contributed immediately. I imagine we'll have a couple add-ons contributing by seasons end. Then a couple of three that contribute in a year or so. That's 10 or so contributors out of 14. Thats a good class of transfers. 10/14 is better than we usually do with our recruits.It’s a mixed bag so far. Some immediate contributors, some guys who should have been here all along and will be great in a year or two, and a couple of duds. Pretty much what you can expect from the portal for a program like TU.
There’s a couple of guys who have “contributed immediately” who are really in the category of “needs a couple of years.”6 out of 14 contributed immediately. I imagine we'll have a couple add-ons contributing by seasons end. Then a couple of three that contribute in a year or so. That's 10 or so contributors out of 14. Thats a good class of transfers. 10/14 is better than we usually do with our recruits.
Regardless of how/why/what(situation) they contribute 10/14 is better than most freshman classes. I'm not talking about all star contributions across the board. Just a baseline contribution at minimum from 10/14 is good.There’s a couple of guys who have “contributed immediately” who are really in the category of “needs a couple of years.”
It’s a mixed bag. It’s going to be fine. Not every transfer is here because they are a great player and it was a numbers game elsewhere. A plug and play transfer is a unicorn even at programs that don’t run our unique schemes. Even when they excel we are typically only seeing what they can do in a situation, not what they can’t. That’s coaching right? Creating a winning situation then the player executing. Keeping them out of situations where their weakness doesn’t help or exposes us. You only know what a player can and cant do if you are at practice. And we aren’t.
Some had problems with their game of one sort or another in the scheme they were in. Our coaches think those folks can be tidied up and hopefully the kids grow up and that happens.
Theres probably a few playing who are dead weight but we have exigencies. There’s probably a few who need a year in the program before they decide whether the coaches will eventually conclude they are dead weight. Let’s wait a few years before we decide if this class was a success.
What we don’t have is some guy who just had shoulder surgery and has never played the game. Or a large number of dudes who don’t even show up. Recruiting nonsense like that from our past. The current staff, with the budget they have, has done yeomans work in the portal this year, so far as we have seen. Now they just need to do the same for the next five years.
Neither is listed on the team sheet for Navy.A little bit of a diversion from the purpose of this topic, but I couldn't find anything in the nearly two pages of recent posts, and I got tired of looking for a more appropriate topic. So minor diversion it is. I wonder if we have permanently lost Watkins and Bray? They are both good players and it is sad to lose the both of them. But Bray is the more important need we have right now. Could've been a very beneficial thing for him to have been available for the Cincy game and beyond.
I think so.Does Wadkins have eligibility in 23 if he doesn’t play this year?
I wonder how long they would stay on the team roster if they are gone, or going to be gone?Neither is listed on the team sheet for Navy.