We could go for hours on this topic. I do not intend to inflame, but OSU has some serious vulnerabilities that their fans rarely admit. Foremost is that it is a one booster program. When Boone dies, it will be back to square one. I know everyone says his money is locked in. We shall see how true that is once his kids start fighting over it and the bills come due. You can make a convincing argument that the only fundamental difference between Kansas State or Iowa State and OSU is Boone. Program like Texas, Alabama, USC and others have several Boones. It stretches credibility when OSU fans compare their program to elite tier programs. On the field performance is one thing, the program top to bottom is another. OSU isn't even close no matter how nice the locker room and film room you build. Second, Gundy has one good year every four or five years. You can take those media guide stats above with a grain of salt. Tt , since he gache first BCS appearance, 2011, iirc was legit. That was a great team. The second one is closer to mediocrity and their appearance there has more to do with subtraction elsewhere in the Big 12 and around the country than addition by OSU. They beat one ranked team (TCU) that year. And TCU was overrated at the time. They lost the last three games of the year against the only portion of their schedule that was challenging. Ole Miss blew them out. That game wasn't even close. Between those two seasons, there is sputtering machine of 8-5s and 7-6 seasons. OSU needs to be more consistent before they can justifiably compare themselves to the programs that OSU fans crave parity with. The fact that a state like Oklahoma can put three teams in a bowl is nothing short of incredible. They are in the top half of the second tier of college football. They are not, and likely will never be, in the top tier.