They can’t. A decisive margin in their districts supports those organizations.They condemn terrorism but not the organizations responsible. Fairly hollow condemnation.
They can’t. A decisive margin in their districts supports those organizations.They condemn terrorism but not the organizations responsible. Fairly hollow condemnation.
We aren't going to go in there, the Democrats aren't that stupid. People issuing their worst fears as possible fact and imagining that is what the other party will do is a nice fear tactic.And there’s no guarantee any of that would continue if we decide to go in there.
This is a horrible mess and we are projecting weakness, confusion, and indecision without solutions. We need better world leadership from the USA. And realistic assessments shared with the public on what a US response will actually entail and what might occur here at home if we go to war.
Isn’t giving $6B to the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism the real problem? We knew Iran’s ties and financial support to these terrorist groups and chose to agree to give them the money anyway. Hopefully Qatar keeps its word. I assume that money isn’t being wired back to the US treasury or US bank any time soon.None of the funds have “been spent or accessed in any way by Iran,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said at a news conference Thursday in Tel Aviv. “It’s still sitting in the Qatari bank, all of it. Every dime of it,” he told reporters at the White House on Thursday. “None of that money has been spent and I have no updates to provide.”
I know it was the first leap by many in the public, myself included. But that does not seem to be the case. Not unless they spent the money before they withdrew it, which would be rather imprudent of Iran. It has been once again frozen, if the Qataris keep their word.
I wouldn't be surprised at all, if this was a desperation move of Putin through Iran. It makes perfect sense, and is a cheap easy escape route for Putin. With the alliance already weakening it's resolve, it gave members of that alliance an easy out excuse. Perfect time to pull something like this.
Philosophically, yes. Actionably at the moment, no. They never should have been so stupid to think their restrictions would change anything. They also never should have considered giving that money no matter the unenforceable restrictions. That placed too much value on five American lives, because that money translated to many more lives lost if they had been allowed access to that money. Ideally one would hope the Democrats realize the error of their ways and never pull something like this again. I have my doubts.Isn’t giving $6B to the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism the real problem?
It never was in American banks. It was in South Korean banks for several years before it was transferred to Qatari banks. It was South Korean payment for Iranian oil that was frozen because of sanctions.I assume that money isn’t being wired back to the US treasury or US bank any time soon.
Our foreign policy as it relates to Iran is deeply flawed. It presumes we can influence their actions in exchange for money and elimination of sanctions. We can’t. Their hatred and opinions of the West are simply too deeply rooted. We are only giving them more money to use toward terrorismPhilosophically, yes. Actionably at the moment, no. They never should have been so stupid to think their restrictions would change anything. They also never should have considered giving that money no matter the unenforceable restrictions. That placed too much value on five American lives, because that money translated to many more lives lost if they had been allowed access to that money. Ideally one would hope the Democrats realize the error of their ways and never pull something like this again. I have my doubts.
It never was in American banks. It was in South Korean banks for several years before it was transferred to Qatari banks. It was South Korean payment for Iranian oil that was frozen because of sanctions.
No not really. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to what the Chinese are paying them for oil. $6 billion is petit cash in this context.Isn’t giving $6B to the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism the real problem?
Iran rarely captures spies, and most of the prisoners they take are guilty of almost nothing. That's one of the things that makes the evil axis evil. I didn't have a problem with their guys being guilty and ours generally not guilty. That's going to be the case in most of our prisoner exchanges.No not really. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to what the Chinese are paying them for oil. $6 billion is petit cash in this context.
The real problem with this agreement was the “prisoner exchange” which was not really a prisoner exchange at all. They took hostages, we pardoned criminals convicted of things like espionage before they even served half their sentences. Two of the individuals are Iranian nationals who will be granted residency status in the United States. They were freed and now the American taxpayer will have to pay the FBI to keep tabs on them for the next thirty to fifty years. Another is a dual national. That’s right: half of the “prisoner exchange” is staying here in the USA because Iran doesn’t want them. Probably because they know how dangerous some of these guys are.
The next problem with the deal is that normalizes waivers for similar deals in the future, which our partners in Germany, the UK and Belgium are begging to do. Countries with significant voting populations of Iranian and Palestinian immigrants. Oman just brokered a prisoner swap for Belgium and both are now asking when Iran will get their money in Belgian banks. Keep that in mind when Congress says sanctions is the desired response.
The fact of the matter is the Iranians need hard cash to stabilize their currency and get 45% inflation under control. Long term e economic stability is the only way they stay in power if the local rural clerics are not getting their bribe money paid by countries buying oil from the government. So the $6 billion probably frees up roughly the same amount to fund domestic bureaucratic and stakeholder corruption and bring down inflation a bit. It buys them time. If they wanted to fund a covert ambush that took a year to plan in another country, it wouldn’t be that $6 billion or the funds such a commitment frees up. It came from sources long ago. They’ve got too much coming in elsewhere. And again, such an amount is petit cash to a country investing in a nuclear arsenal and probably doesn’t come close to what it cost if the Iranians called the shots on the attack.
Nope. Let them go.
The most revealing part is the last minute. He essentially confesses:
Wouldn't shock me at all. Putin is desperate enough that I don't think he cares about Israeli Russians. Regaining his footing in Ukraine and achieving 'victory' is of more importance to him. All he cares about is solidifying his power back to normalcy.The most surprising is his boasting that what they are doing is part of a loose confederation of nations with common interests engaging in a multi front war to frustrate US interests and activities. As we talked about above. I would love to know if that’s news to Putin. If the Russians funded their arms build up, which he alludes to, to alleviate pressure on the Donbass, and to make their new drone manufacturing buddy Iran happy, then the world war some of you keep wanting to start has probably already started. I’m skeptical of that. Israel is about one sixth ethnic Russian. You are just as likely to hear Russian on the street as English. He’s got some intertwining considerations with Israel - both domestic and international.
All eyes are drawn to the strong horse..The most revealing part is the last minute. He essentially confesses:
His version of his religion/value system is tied to death and conflict, while the west sees war as a prelude to peace and the protection of life. These aren’t people you can negotiate with. They will negotiate with you and even sign agreements that they actually honor out of convenience. But they do not have the interests or goals in mind ultimately that you do. Brute force and submission to your will is all they understand because that is their value system and they will do the same to you if given the chances.
They will start by destroying Lebanon by provoking Israel.Moving closer and closer to a full scale war in the Middle East. Large amounts of US military assets on the move into the arena. Iran started this dance. Are they willing to be an actual participant ?
They’ve already taken 2 million refugees spanning several generations. And the birth rate of the refugees increases that population whether they admit more or not.Jordan is interesting. They refuse to take a single Palestinian refugee. I can see why they want this conflict to end.
Palestinian refugees have been a huge destabilizing influence in Lebanon as well. Probably the main cause of the Civil War there in the 70s and 80s. They remain stateless people in camp cities there to this day.They’ve already taken 2 million refugees spanning several generations. And the birth rate of the refugees increases that population whether they admit more or not.
The welcoming of those refugees was meant to stabilize the situation and they were meant to be temporary camps. Decades ago.
Making those facilities larger is not a solution. And perhaps invites violence if they were to take on a substantial number and clear out residential areas into militarized zones that could be occupied for decades like the Korean DMZ.
A member of the US Congress did the same. The lack of responsibility on behalf of the press and member of Congress is deeply saddening.Looks like a lot of people are going to die because today the western press was super eager to believe lies from a terrorist organization and published them without verifying. Pretty much perfectly encapsulates the entire conflict for the past 3 decades
NPR schills for its benefactors. It is no more independent than MSNBC, CNN or Fox...Was listening to NPR this evening, and they went into who was at fault on bombing of the hospital. Of course they stated that Israel & the IDF newly presented evidence that it was a jihad organization at fault, and that the US presented similar but separate evidence that it was not Israel who had caused the blast. Then they said that they could not confirm this evidence, and briefly went into a diatribe about them not being able to confirm it, that lent towards them appearing to be suspect about it.
I didn't hear this when they or any other news outlet initially said the bombing was being reportedly caused by Israel and the IDF. Obviously they should have said it was unconfirmed when they first reported it. When they later reported it as unconfirmed, but evidence showing it as this other Hamas organization's accident, they should have left it at that. A simple report unconfirmed with no diatribe was the appropriate thing to do. This is a volatile situation that doesn't need to be influenced by biased reporting like this. Hold to ethics on both counts. None of the liberal media outlets held to this standard.
This is dangerous reporting that can contribute to starting a war.
That’s part of my satirical commentary.I like how the same people who have been given hundreds of billions of dollars of our budget to see 911 coming supposedly didn’t see it coming but totally intercepted communications from terrorists talking about it immediately after.
This conspiracy theory isn’t clever or even new.
In defense of NPR they have been measured in reporting the source of that explosion.CBS News is still spreading the lie as of an hour ago. We hear all the time about how bad disinformation is and how “journalism is important.” I wish our journalists would act like it. Being a willing participant in a blood libel is a pretty terrible thing.
Were they as measured when they first reported it as being the IDF, as reported by the opposition? I didn't hear their reporting then.In defense of NPR they have been measured in reporting the source of that explosion.
I do hear some left leaning assumptions baked into their news but not nearly as bad as some are portraying IMO.
Not sureWere they as measured when they first reported it as being the IDF, as reported by the opposition? I didn't hear their reporting then.
60% of those polled probably couldn’t find Israel on a map.If this Harvard/Harris Poll can be believed some 13% of 18-24 year olds and 19% of 25-34 year olds believe the attack was both genocidal AND justified. That’s……concerning
60% of ALL Americans couldn’t find Israel on a map60% of those polled probably couldn’t find Israel on a map.