Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here you go:Can’t read it without a subscription.
Lack of creativity in play calling and poor use of offensive skill players.He only caught 17 passes in 4 years?
How is that possible... ?
At the strategic level, the Baylor offense is the evolution of Yeoman’s Houston offense. It even uses the same terminology.He only caught 17 passes in 4 years?
How is that possible... ?
I think you should probably temper your expectation for the future and have a more open mind about the past. Not arguing Monty was 'good'.... just that you're ignoring a lot of important information that might give you a more holistic picture of what has gone on and what is likely to go on.At the strategic level, the Baylor offense is the evolution of Yeoman’s Houston offense. It even uses the same terminology.
So it’s veer concepts designed to hold safeties and linebackers or put them on an island.
It’s quite literally a high school offense with about 20 plays borrowing heavily from 1960’s option football.
So 75% of the time, you are handing off to the RB or holding the RB in pass protect off a fake hand off.
If you’ve got a lot of pass play options for RB, then he’s not a threat to run and the premise of this offense breaks down.
A lot of the swing and wheel routes designed for RBs to get the ball in space in other offenses are replaced with the outside receiver coming back to the ball behind the line to use that space and the RB at home to protect in this offense.
The two exceptions to that are an old run and shoot pick play Montgomery toyed with that used play action and another designed to essentially develop into a choice play for the HB and RB. But that was only run when certain LB looks/cheats were shown. You might remember the comedy of Zach Smith running on a roll out and quick passing it over the RBs shoulder when he reached the edge and turned up field. He did that because there’s only one read in the passing game on that play. TE streak. They ran it in the red zone mostly. QB glances at safety after ball snap, if safety bites pass on the TE running straight ahead just inside the hash and freezes or back pedals, then its a dump off to the RB. Or a sack. It’s a high school offense. Seriously, one read with 3 WR and a TE running routes.
There’s one or two RB passing routes in the four or five drop back passing plays with QB under center but how many times did you see a TU QB under center?
So he had no catches because there are basically no plays to get him the ball.
I’m super curious about the ability of Wilson to install his scheme. It might take 2 years or even longer if he has to develop a QB.
Switching to his playbook will be like putting down The Cat in the Hat and picking up War and Peace.
I think you should probably temper your expectation for the future and have a more open mind about the past. Not arguing Monty was 'good'.... just that you're ignoring a lot of important information that might give you a more holistic picture of what has gone on and what is likely to go on.
We were mediocre in a time of seismic change in the college athletic landscape, when we needed to be a standout Now we feel like an afterthought. That’s the work product of Monty, Haith and Gragg as well as TU administration.I think you should probably temper your expectation for the future and have a more open mind about the past. Not arguing Monty was 'good'.... just that you're ignoring a lot of important information that might give you a more holistic picture of what has gone on and what is likely to go on.
2 last year for sure...thankfully he did leave them out there otherwise we'd be stuck with him and his lame ass recruiting for another yearWho knows how many wins were left on the table with Montgomery’s coaching
The Chiefs have used multiple RBs in games depending on the play call and situation. Deneric being able to read the defense and pick up a blitz will determine his playing time. I know Edwards-Hellaire is still technically a Chief but I expect they will either try to trade him or just release him outright and slide Prince up. CEH's cap number is much higher than Prince's and the Chiefs are in that "Patriot way" mode of trying to save as much $ as possible to keep the key players around to continue their level of success. The current economics around the salary cap in the NFL puts premiums on players like Prince and Chris Paul who can play like they were 2nd or 3rd round draft choices without carrying the cap # of a 2nd or 3rd round draft choice. Where they will get hurt is when they start or play significant minutes on their rookie contracts and then want starter money on their 2nd contracts.Not to be a Debbie downer but Pacheco is expected to be back for Week 1. Prince is still 4th on the depth chart at RB.
He could see PT if he moves up to 2nd spot. The tweet mentioning Prince as being next man up comes from someone who mostly tweets about investing.
I think so. But there is a difference. Frank left us with a truly awful talent level. I get the sense the football talent level is better and we have a chance to be pretty good this season. Guess we will see.Monty damaged our football program, like Frank did in the basketball program. This was due to the incompetence of the athletic director Derrick Gragg and the university administration turmoil during that time.
As we've seen, most of the coaches that have been fired/departed left us with some really good pieces that were being misused or the scheme was just wrong. Remember Monty came in and we went to a bowl game in year 1 and won 10 games in year 2, mostly with BBs guys in key positions. BB won with Graham's guys, Graham won with K's guys....hell Kragthorpe won with Burns' guys and remember how terrible Burns' teams were and how he alienated local HS football coaches, etc.? And Monty's players/schemes weren't terrible. If anything his game management was his undoing and we've talked about that ad nauseam on this board for about 5 years.I think so. But there is a difference. Frank left us with a truly awful talent level. I get the sense the football talent level is better and we have a chance to be pretty good this season. Guess we will see.
A player's coach that didn't adequately discipline his players. Both for stupid 15-yard penalties and lack of dedication in the classroom.The one thing that really does stick out to me is that as much mediocrity as Monty had, a lot of his kids were ready to run through a brick wall for him right up until the last day. He was a player’s coach.
4 per season...Who knows how many wins were left on the table with Montgomery’s coaching
IMO Monty’s offense regressed during his tenure. The offense that he ran in the first two seasons did not continue on. Anyone remember the back shoulder slants we threw to Keyaris? How about the WR screens that we checked to when the other team was playing a saggy zone? Those were our bread and butter and they disappeared under Smith and Brin.The problem with Monty’s offense really wasn’t in its basic design imo. There are dudes that still run some version of it successfully, but they’ve innovated, meshed it with other concepts that work, and adapted with the game. That’s basic stuff everyone has to do, but for us there was very little added or changed year to year. There were times I also wondered if we scout ourselves because my God we had some tendencies.
Right. In the area he had very little to do with.Conversely, his defenses improved greatly.
And the coach that was responsible for that is now a P5 DC who got his team to the CFP in his 1st year there. We can give Monty credit for bringing him in, but Gillespie was a genius whose brilliance was able to shine after Young retired.Right. In the area he had very little to do with.
The head coach should get credit for making changes when changes are warranted. Not every coach would have been willing to change the entire scheme to give themselves a chance.Right. In the area he had very little to do with.
He defends loser TU coaches in football almost as much as he harps on any basketball coach here not named Danny Manning. Why he seems to give Monty so many chances for only having two decent seasons out of 9 is odd. He let Young change the system of defense because he wasn't in charge of it, and micromanaging it to death.The head coach should get credit for making changes when changes are warranted. Not every coach would have been willing to change the entire scheme to give themselves a chance.
Heck, Wilson’s defense struggled for his entire tenure at Indiana.
I thought the exact thing but decided it was a waste of time to type out that thought.He defends loser TU coaches in football almost as much as he harps on any basketball coach here not named Danny Manning.
I waste my time on that more than I should.I thought the exact thing but decided it was a waste of time to type out that thought.
I would say 4/8 of Montgomery’s seasons were “decent”….He defends loser TU coaches in football almost as much as he harps on any basketball coach here not named Danny Manning. Why he seems to give Monty so many chances for only having two decent seasons out of 9 is odd. He let Young change the system of defense because he wasn't in charge of it, and micromanaging it to death.
It must be the letter M that he loves, Manning & Montgomery. Any coach not with the last initial M shouldn't even apply for the position of head coach.
Agreed. Monty had some really good coaches on staff which is why none of them seemed to last too long and get poached by other schools. He did bring some good, talented coaches on staff...he gets credit for that.Agree with Aston. Head coach gets credit for making good hires and blame for bad ones. It’s his job to have an eye for talented coaches and get them to come work for him. It’s almost more important than him being a good coach himself. He did other things poorly, but if the defense is good the head coach gets some of the credit for hiring the defensive mastermind.