Only because he is a Jr. Lots of time. And, it's Frank. He has a track record of losing commits.Why do you say that?
Only because he is a Jr. Lots of time. And, it's Frank. He has a track record of losing commits.Why do you say that?
Phipps actually signing is 50:50
That reminds me of pretty much everything we already know lawpoke
Phipps hits a couple of wide open threes and then the opponent will be in his jock strap. He would need to work off screens and picks to get his shot off. He will do just fine shooting when getting some help , but he's going to beat anyone off the dribble by himself. The Thompson kid will have no problem , however bigger fish are after him .I’ve known Trey since he was in grade school. He’s a great kid and a pure shooter. However, he’s currently a 6’1” shooting guard with average athletic ability. The obvious question is whether he will be able to get his shot against more athletic 6’5” guards. He will always be good as a spot up shooter but may be limited offensively. We shall see. The plus side is you can’t have too many shooters. The down side is we’re looking at a 5’11” and 6’1” backcourt with neither being a “plus” athlete. However, both can score.
That said...we need to recruit some “plus” athletes out of high school. Haith hasn’t been good at that.
Because it’s the perfect “I told you so” prediction. Either way he can say he was right.Why do you say that?
Last year we had Taplin-Henderson-Jeffries-Etou-Igbanu and missed the NIT. Lack of talent is not the problem.
Etou was a big time playerLast year we had Taplin-Henderson-Jeffries-Etou-Igbanu and missed the NIT. Lack of talent is not the problem.
I guess I never considered Phipps a “game-changing” signee. To me, it was a nice story to sign a small local kid who could shoot.
If you watch the BTW games, he won’t strike you as a player that will be impactful on a D1 (AAC) roster.
But, he’ll work hard and probably set a good example within our program.
When Jeffries graduates, we will have arguably the least athletic team in TU history and the most un-athletic team in the AAC...who can’t shoot.
I’ve known Trey since he was in grade school. He’s a great kid and a pure shooter. However, he’s currently a 6’1” shooting guard with average athletic ability. The obvious question is whether he will be able to get his shot against more athletic 6’5” guards. He will always be good as a spot up shooter but may be limited offensively. We shall see. The plus side is you can’t have too many shooters. The down side is we’re looking at a 5’11” and 6’1” backcourt with neither being a “plus” athlete. However, both can score.
That said...we need to recruit some “plus” athletes out of high school. Haith hasn’t been good at that.
Last year we had Taplin-Henderson-Jeffries-Etou-Igbanu and missed the NIT. Lack of talent is not the problem.
He looks pretty youthful. Is there a chance he could still grow a few inches?
Phipps is a smaller version of his dad...a great shooter and that’s something TU needs . However, his son is never going to beat a D- 1 defender consistently off the dribble without help . He can help TU big time on the outside by becoming a zone buster,sMaybe. His dad is 6’3-6’4”. His mom isn’t very tall. Never know though.
Players want to get their college paid by the university and feel wanted by the coach . Being offered to "Walk on" by the coach is telling a kid that maybe we think you can develop enough to play for us but right now we don't want to take the risk with a scholarship .I haven’t seen much except a few high school highlights, but just from the fan’s eye test, athletically he seems to be a locker room guy that helps in the classroom to boost the overall team GPA who has a game or two shooting against lesser competition early in the year. He resides in that gray area between walk-on and role player. Not my choice but I get why Haith would pick a local shooter he can get just for PR reasons if nothing else. What I don’t get is that if he has the grades, why isn’t he a preferred walk on to save the spot?
Huffy says “hey, if the shoe fits ...”.Players want to get their college paid by the university and feel wanted by the coach . Being offered to "Walk on" by the coach is telling a kid that maybe we think you can develop enough to play for us but right now we don't want to take the risk with a scholarship .