I believe that was for endowed scholarships, not NIL.What happened to that $30 million gift from an "anonymous donor" that was supposed to go directly to athletics (and I presume some of that to NIL money)?
Lamb has gone on record saying TU will be in the top 4 in the league in player compensation. To me, that sounds like we’re willing to pay for talent. Can we offer $1m-$2m per guy? Probably not, but being in the top top 1/4 of the league in player compensation should be able to buy us some decent talent at several positions in need.There are FCS programs paying $100,000 or more, yearly, for D linemen, each.
I’m skeptical TU will ever pay competitive prices for that type of labor cost without significant changes to the structuring of the athletic department and the funding of other sports.
The math just doesn’t add up. $28,500 a roster spot gets you to 3 million. With nothing left over for basketball, soccer, or the girls.Lamb has gone on record saying TU will be in the top 4 in the league in player compensation. To me, that sounds like we’re willing to pay for talent. Can we offer $1m-$2m per guy? Probably not, but being in the top top 1/4 of the league in player compensation should be able to buy us some decent talent at several positions in need.
Wasn’t the $3m earmarked for football only?The math just doesn’t add up. $28,500 a roster spot gets you to 3 million. With nothing left over for basketball, soccer, or the girls.
So… if we’re “top 4 in the AAC” in player compensation (direct quote from Lamb), the majority of the league must be paying their players less. Not sure how fcs schools are paying more for their kickers than the top of the aac.You guys want a Top 25 or Top 10 G5 team. $28500 won’t get you a back up kicker in the FCS.
Huffy is just bitching to bitch. Some people just find stuff to complain about.So… if we’re “top 4 in the AAC” in player compensation (direct quote from Lamb), the majority of the league must be paying their players less. Not sure how fcs schools are paying more for their kickers than the top of the aac.
Grasping.Huffy is just bitching to bitch. Some people just find stuff to complain about.
Spoiler: FCS teams aren't paying more for kickers than the top of the aac...idiotic nonsense being spewed.
So let me get this straight. You’re asserting the following:Grasping.
Teams trying to win in the FCS are paying considerably more than some AAC teams at all positions. IOW teams that aren’t trying to win.
And I presume you are expecting to win.
When kids are turning down TU and signing with the FCS it is almost always because our cash offer is being matched and exceeded. Including backup kickers.