2025 U.S. News Ranking
- By TU_BLA
- General Interest
- 9 Replies
Agreed. Peer reputation is still weighted way too heavily IMO. Sure, we have certain programs that are known and well-regarded nationally, but there aren't enough who view TU as a peer because of the overall national perception amongst institutions and amongst potential students.Peer reputation is still 20% of the score.
Percentage of alumni who give, which TU was once in the Top 10, is no longer part of the score.
We take a bath on peer review and Pell Grant retention. Which is one reason you hear Wilson constantly saying we need to graduate everyone on the team. Athletes are a disproportionate number of our Pell Grant students and they all want to portal without graduating.
These rating are what the committee think a college should be, not an estimation of academic quality.
Otherwise, things like average faculty salary would not be weighed alongside average ACT and graduation rates.
Pell grant is a valid measure but also hurts schools because of the athlete side of things and the fact that the NCAA has basically said they don't care if its member institutions are academic schools first...sure they say it but it's a 100% facade. These are pro teams now and graduation is secondary to the TV ratings the athletes produce. Maybe US News and World report needs to remove that metric.
As for TUs ACT avg of incoming students, % of NMS attending, etc. should be an indication of student quality and the 2 yr and 3 yr retention rates should also be a big factor as that would be an indicator that the students attending think they are getting a valuable education. And don't they also measure the % of students who are accepted to grad school or employed in their field of choice 6 months after undergrad graduation date? TU performs well in those metrics as well.