ADVERTISEMENT

This post is the hope of USMNT vs true apathetic reality

I feel kind of bad responding at all because I really believe there is an issue. And I don't want to be dismissive or engage too much.. But it is hard to hold back.
I really believe there is an issue too. But that doesn't excuse the views that would likely be there, regardless of the issue. Having an issue doesn't excuse a belief system. Then again if he spent years treating the problem and was a 'relatively' normal human being without the cockamamie views then I would feel bad. Which is also a possibility. I think the more viable possibility is most of the views he espouses would still be there even if he treated his mental illness, and got it under control. I just think what I thougnt was his 'permaban' should never have been lifted by chris. He clutters every board with junk. His long conversations with himself are enjoyed by no one but himself.

This post is the hope of USMNT vs true apathetic reality

There are some odd ducks here that seem to let politics creep into everything in society. It is wild. It is with a certain group of firebrands that have done this with the Jim Birch Society and McCarthy Era since the 1950s. It probably goes even further than that, but we are constantly a house on fire while society moves forward.

Represalia finds some pernicious, Kamala, sinister things when it is just bad decision-making in general. He wants to start talking about Kamala Harris with the hiring of Mauricio Pochettino at US Soccer. Is this on Poch? Does he want too much money? Does he want to screw with the academy system beyond disbelief? Does he not want to have to do any Alexi Lalas interviews or ever see Julie Foudy on TV? That would be a minimum baseline for me.
I believe he just wants the money he is owed from his Chelsea contract. Your minimums certainly aren’t unreasonable…
  • Like
Reactions: TU_BLA

Tulsa vs Arkansas state predictions

Why do you bring up that it was a road game.(NIU) This game is a road game, so that doesn't differentiate it. Our winning this contest, and/or by how much, will be based on how our line holds up against their defense. If our line holds up then we will be fine, and could win by a lot.
Arkansas states defensive line is a perfect line for our offense to go against imo
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW

Tulsa vs Arkansas state predictions

Well, that game was on the road and Cardell played very poorly if I remember.
I don't see Kirk doing that, so that's why I think we win fairly easily.
Why do you bring up that it was a road game.(NIU) This game is a road game, so that doesn't differentiate it. Our winning this contest, and/or by how much, will be based on how our line holds up against their defense. If our line holds up then we will be fine, and could win by a lot.
  • Like
Reactions: dougheffking

Updating the cost of climate change

My grandfather who was a vp of geology at exxon/esso & the majority of other oil execs predicted many years back that we would be out of oil 30 years later. Then we found ways of going deeper. Finding ways of going deeper is only going to keep us in oil for so long, and then we will be out of oil. We are using at a rate that far exceeds the supply in the earth's crust. Those same executives have looked at studies by scientists that they funded, and now have it occurring 28 years from now. We have pushed it about 70-80 years further into the future by finding ways to drill deeper. But it will happen. The one thing the oil execs and scientists know is that the oil supply, despite finding ways to dig deeper,(more supply) is far too small. Our usage rate won't let it replenish itself before it runs out. It takes 1000's of years to make the supply that we will use up in about 300 years. We are still using dinosaurs decomposed corpses if that gives you a clue. So you stfu about things you haven't a clue about.
FYI, we didn’t really go “deeper” than we were 30 years ago….


A few years ago I was in charge of reviewing and approving plans for the abandonment of some of the deepest producing wells in the US (+24,000 ft True Vertical Depth). These were wells from the 70’s and not many similar wells throughout the US have been drilled since. Let me tell you that drilling, producing, and abandoning these “ultra deep” wells is a real challenge due to the pressures and temperatures involved.

By contrast, it has become fairly common place in the past 30 years, with advancements in the technology and practices around fracking and horizontal drilling, to go down 6,000 ft and horizontal 2 or more miles (so ~17,000 ft of total wellbore length)

This has nothing to do with the imbecile above…. I just wanted to provide some clarification. Recovery rates since the days of Hubbert and his “peak oil” analysis have gone up substantially because of horizontal drilling and fracking (and to a lesser degree water and C02 injection recovery techniques), not deeper reservoirs. Thus extending the window till we reach “peak oil”

I actually think that market economics for energy and us realizing that we shouldn’t be using carbon for certain applications will help us reach “peak oil” before our ability to find enough producible oil begins to decline.

Updating the cost of climate change

“bc if people knew oil is THE ULTIMATE SELF REPLENISHING RENEWABLE RESOURCE THEYD FLIP & WE’LL LOSE NOT ONLY OUR MORAL AUTHORITY WE’LL LOSE OUR GRIFT!” The real alarmists behind/funding climate alarmists
My grandfather who was a vp of geology at exxon/esso & the majority of other oil execs predicted many years back that we would be out of oil 30 years later. Then we found ways of going deeper. Finding ways of going deeper is only going to keep us in oil for so long, and then we will be out of oil. We are using at a rate that far exceeds the supply in the earth's crust. Those same executives have looked at studies by scientists that they funded, and now have it occurring 28 years from now. We have pushed it about 70-80 years further into the future by finding ways to drill deeper. But it will happen. The one thing the oil execs and scientists know is that the oil supply, despite finding ways to dig deeper,(more supply) is far too small. Our usage rate won't let it replenish itself before it runs out. It takes 1000's of years to make the supply that we will use up in about 300 years. We are still using dinosaurs decomposed corpses if that gives you a clue. So you stfu about things you haven't a clue about.
  • Like
Reactions: Clong83a
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT