Need to find a way to use Reyna productively assuming he can stay healthy.
As to the younger guys Aaronson's brother looks pretty good.
As to the younger guys Aaronson's brother looks pretty good.
Yeah, our set pieces were terrible all tournament. Did we even create one single dangerous chance from a set piece? I don’t remember any. More times than not the corners didn’t beat the first man.So much for spending over $1 million for a set piece specialist coach.
So he is saying the top teams are going to do what they do and that he can exploit that fact.
Until it doesn't. Huge ego. Doesn't mean he's incorrect about us though.Sounds like he’s saying the elite teams don’t have to adjust what they do because they’re elite. Teams like the USA do in fact need to adjust when they’re playing superior teams to have a chance to win. He is planning to adapt to what teams like France, Spain, etc are doing which will give them chances of success. Is that not accurate ?
OK, let me start with some transparency. Soccer was my sport as a teenager in the late 70s and early 80s and I was fortunate enough to play on some very good teams for that period. But I am not an expert. Never been a coach. My daughters had no interest in team sports so I was not a hovering dad. I don't follow any of the club sides or leagues around the world - only the USMNT, the World Cup, and a few other national competitions. I'm not an expert in tactics - back when I played it was always 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 and off you go. In other words there is a lot I don't know.Lots of thoughts and probably a few questions to put out there when I have a real keyboard.
Amen! First, the USSF has gone "woke". Seem more concerned about social justice and MNT vs WMT equality ($). This includes Beer?halter who has stated: we've been talking to the guys every day they are together for the last 18 months about social justice. Then there was the rainbow crest on the practice jerseys (not red, white & blue) at the WC. To be fair, some other countries did related things that got quickly shut down by the Qataris. Not excusing horrible treatment by certain middle eastern countries, but the world's largest SPORTING event was not the place for it, IMO. That's for the governments of our respective countries & others.If this guy is employed next week, I’m not sure I’m going to a game again ever even if they drop the price from $100 to $10. That’s not a melt due to today. There’s real systemic issues at USSF that makes this not fun anymore after 50+ caps for me in more than 10 countries and three continents over 35 years.
OK, let me start with some transparency. Soccer was my sport as a teenager in the late 70s and early 80s and I was fortunate enough to play on some very good teams for that period. But I am not an expert. Never been a coach. My daughters had no interest in team sports so I was not a hovering dad. I don't follow any of the club sides or leagues around the world - only the USMNT, the World Cup, and a few other national competitions. I'm not an expert in tactics - back when I played it was always 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 and off you go. In other words there is a lot I don't know.
With all that said I watched all our qualifiers and many friendlies leading up to this WC and it sure felt to me like we had some player deficits in the central defense and, especially, up top. And all the guys we tried from Pepi to Deke to Sargent to Pefok didn't impress me. So I'm not sure from that perspective what other guys we could have brought into the roster would have made a material difference up front. But I freely admit that there could be other players I don't know who were never brought into the team and who might have made a difference. if so i would be curious who they are.
As to coaching deficits, I have heard a lot of criticism and certainly saw some of the weird lineup tinkering in qualifying and other run up matches. But what specifically would a different coach have done that would have made a tangible difference in this tournament tactically or otherwise, given our few but critical player gaps? That's a real question. I don't have the expertise to know that.
Or looking forward, what would a new, accomplished coach provide to take this group to the next level that the current staff cannot provide? Again, I am not baiting anyone. Rather wanting to learn.
One overarching thing would have been to prepare for this cup, not the next one. Which would have meant settling on a roster a lot earlier than Berhalter did. That way the unit can gain cohesiveness. I don't really think all the guys he called up helped in the next World Cup anyway.Then, over the first couple years, he called up over 60 people for tryouts, mostly from MLS. All he had to do was look to our best players in GB and Europe. Get these guys together and play them in quals repeatedly to mold a team even tougher than what we saw.
I think this is an important point. Haji Wright hadn't been part of this squad in any meaningful matches up until now (that I can recall anyway). Ream either and the Ream played in this WC seems to indicate that was a HUGE mistake by Berhalter in qualifying. I understand tinkering with the 9 position since we didn't have anyone truly stand out. I saw things from Sargent and Wright that give me hope but they need to be part of the squad more to build with Weah and Pulisic and Aaronson. Not having Reyna play seems to be a clash of egos between Berhalter and Reyna....maybe the same with PeFok. Also, Berhalter's seeming love affair with Zimmerman at a CB spot when CCV seemed to be a clear better option as shown in the game vs Iran is troubling.One overarching thing would have been to prepare for this cup, not the next one. Which would have meant settling on a roster a lot earlier than Berhalter did. That way the unit can gain cohesiveness. I don't really think all the guys he called up helped in the next World Cup anyway.
They were disastrous in the PK shootout. 2 poor shots that were saved and the Croatian GK made an absolute stunning save on the 2nd PK by Japan. The 1st shot was awful and was something you see from someone who was afraid of missing the goal. Granted, the Croatian GK went the right direction on 3 of 4 shots but the 1st and 4th shots were not well placed by the Japanese.Well Japan didn’t make the quarters but it would do well for the US to watch how they played. They were quick, they were going to get that loose ball before you, they are always looking for ways to get forward and if you’re playing Japan and your teammate passes the ball you better move to it because the guy marking you is moving to the ball. Just a super fun team to watch.
They were interesting. MLS had a similar shootout format when the league first started. It was basically the same as an NHL penalty shot where the player started from center and the GK could come out and close once the puck/ball was touched.I really liked the old NASL shootout way better than PKs.
Moroccan keeper was living rent free in Spain's head. Dude was amazing. At least 2 of the PKs Spain took were altered before they even touched them trying to react to what the keeper was "showing".España se ha ido! Morocco held them off until penalty kicks and won 3-0. I was amazed that Spain made no PKs.
I was hoping for Morocco or Senegal to make it through. I always like to have an African underdog to root for. So far it had been the higher seeds winning every time. I didn't like that Croatia would have to suffice for an underdog.España se ha ido! Morocco held them off until penalty kicks and won 3-0. I was amazed that Spain made no PKs.
So yeah, not as easy as you want to make it sound. Missing high is a whole lot easier than missing low. Also, it is way easier for GKs to get to high shots than low shots. If players started going top corner every time, the GK would likely save more shots. If you look at the best players who have taken a good number of shots, they vary it. They'll go top left one time, bottom right next, then high middle after. This is why GKs need to guess on PKs and it they're not guessing they're picking up on something the shooter keys them to. My son says he instantly looks at the players eyes when he knows who the shooter is going to be even before the shooter has the ball in his hand and places the ball on the spot. He says 75% of the time they shoot in the spot they look to first. He's even noticed players who try to misdirect a keeper stare at a spot for too long and he knows they're going opposite direction. He says the toughest PKs are the ones that go down the middle with authority.Why do these players not drill it in the top corner. They are the best players in the world and should be able to do it greater than 90% of the time. These guys are so mentally weak, its pathetic.
Asking that is like asking why pro all star basketball players don't hit all of their free throws.So yeah, not as easy as you want to make it sound. Missing high is a whole lot easier than missing low. Also, it is way easier for GKs to get to high shots than low shots. If players started going top corner every time, the GK would likely save more shots. If you look at the best players who have taken a good number of shots, they vary it. They'll go top left one time, bottom right next, then high middle after. This is why GKs need to guess on PKs and it they're not guessing they're picking up on something the shooter keys them to. My son says he instantly looks at the players eyes when he knows who the shooter is going to be even before the shooter has the ball in his hand and places the ball on the spot. He says 75% of the time they shoot in the spot they look to first. He's even noticed players who try to misdirect a keeper stare at a spot for too long and he knows they're going opposite direction. He says the toughest PKs are the ones that go down the middle with authority.
And for 2 of Spain's shots today, they were poorly placed and too easy for the GK to reach. This is typical of a player who is worried about missing the goal.
I can't read the actual article, but reading the byline and the few lines it lets me read, they're not wrong. It's more reminiscent of the style Liverpool wants to play with the high fullbacks and a possessive 6 and high pressing front 3. If you have the right players to play it, you'll do well. It also demands 2 CBs who can flat out play and this will be the piece the US will need to work on moving forward. Plus a way to make sure we've got the right (and best) players on the field. Not sure why Reyna got no time in this WC. He's way too good on the ball, maybe only 2nd behind Pulisic on this roster. And even in the vein of Liverpool, maybe we need to look at Weah as the 9 in order to get Reyna on the field and you can still run Aaronson at the 8/10 alongside McKennie.Interesting analysis of US play.
USA passed and pressed like a modern club side. Will they have convinced the world?
Plenty of metrics captured a style that has a lot more in common with the world's best teams than it used to. The signs are encouraging...theathletic.com
I’ve haven’t read the article but Gregg is trying to run a modified version of what Jesse does, he just can’t write checks to do it and has to play some players who don’t fit it.I can't read the actual article, but reading the byline and the few lines it lets me read, they're not wrong. It's more reminiscent of the style Liverpool wants to play with the high fullbacks and a possessive 6 and high pressing front 3. If you have the right players to play it, you'll do well. It also demands 2 CBs who can flat out play and this will be the piece the US will need to work on moving forward. Plus a way to make sure we've got the right (and best) players on the field. Not sure why Reyna got no time in this WC. He's way too good on the ball, maybe only 2nd behind Pulisic on this roster. And even in the vein of Liverpool, maybe we need to look at Weah as the 9 in order to get Reyna on the field and you can still run Aaronson at the 8/10 alongside McKennie.
And if you look at Liverpool and Man City who run this high press system with the best of them, their front 3 are quick and skilled. They don't really have a true 9 in that regard, a big physical holdup type of forward, but smaller, quicker players who are absolutely lethal with just the smallest amount of space. We keep trying to force the "9" issue. Put the best players out there and go.
Croatia played a match precisely to get to PKs knowing they have one of the best GKs in the world in PK situations. When Brazil brought Fred on to start the 2nd ET period, I texted my son that Fred was going to have a costly turnover and Croatia would score the equalizer....I'm not sure if he had the TO or contributed in the breakdown of the Brazilian defense, but Fred is never the answer if you need solid defending and ball control. Tite would have been way better suited bringing Fabinho on to help see this out.Wow! I thought the Croatia/Brazil match would end in storybook fashion with a Brazilian legend winning the game in extra time but Croatia ties it up and win in penalty kicks. I really thought we would be seeing a Brazil/France final but it wasn’t to be.
How many club teams will be working on that set piece over the next few weeks ?And the Netherlands ties it up in the last minute!
Does Fox have worldwide broadcast rights ?Croatia played a match precisely to get to PKs knowing they have one of the best GKs in the world in PK situations. When Brazil brought Fred on to start the 2nd ET period, I texted my son that Fred was going to have a costly turnover and Croatia would score the equalizer....I'm not sure if he had the TO or contributed in the breakdown of the Brazilian defense, but Fred is never the answer if you need solid defending and ball control. Tite would have been way better suited bringing Fabinho on to help see this out.
And the difference between Croatia and Brazil in the shootout was night and day. The 1st 2 Croatian shooters were cold blooded by going down the middle and it opened up the next 2 shooters to go to the posts because Allison just had to hold a beat before guessing. The 1st Brazilian player shot not to miss the goal and hit the GK. Marqinhos was trying to be too fine.
I bet Fox is pissed as the anticipated Brazil-Argentina semi matchup could have had a worldwide live audience of 1.5 billion viewers. Croatia Argentina could see a good audience but likely will be < 1B. If Netherlands finds a way through Argentina, that audience drops to maybe 500M
I couldn’t agree more, I love the World Cup.Man, the World Cup is so awesome. Crazy games today. So much drama and so fun to watch.
So France versus England or attend a meaningless TU basketball game?I couldn’t agree more, I love the World Cup.