Anything that results in anyone but Trump. The only possible outcomes from the electoral college are HRC, DT, Johnson, and Stein. Most states limit them to the candidates who were on the ballot in their state (of course most also take an oath that they will vote for the candidate elected by majority in their state). Utah's could vote for Evan McMullin for instance. If the vote is fractured enough, then the back room wheeling and dealing gets going for the House vote...Paul Ryan?
The hacks into the DNC emails is an attempt to subvert and influence voters through reactions to this type of news.
It is crazy...and there have only been a few faithless electors in the entire history of the electoral college. I am not saying I am advocating this UNLESS there is hardcore proof that Russia engaged in activities that resulted in fraudulent votes being cast (i.e. somehow hacking electronic voting machines and rigging vote tallies) and if that happened an injunction to the entire process should be sought.
I read that several times and I still don't know what you said . I understand the first sentence . The second sentence is unfathomable .
I am curious what you find fake about that? It said trump won but implies that uncounted ballots may be in her favor. Any statistician or modeler, such as nate silver, would tell you that it probably didn't swing the election. Hell the recount in WI gave trump something like 131 more votes. Assuming that is true in EVERY state and there was zero mistakes for the GOP that would give trump something like 8,304 more votes across the United States based on WI's population. Given the
the GOP pulled with driver's license facilities after passing voter ID laws in AL, I don't buy that every state would have revealed more votes for Trump. 8,304 is not greater than 2,641,608. The Electoral college is a joke.
I was under the impression...perhaps incorrect... that there were some votes that were counted originally but were somehow unrecoverable for a recount because they were old style machines. If they were never counted, how do we know there were 75,335?
cause that's the number of registered voters that signed for a ballot in those precincts. That's easy to figure out...the part about the vote tallies not equaling the number of ballots is the puzzling part. While you can assume a small number chose not to vote for president, 75k is a pretty large number
Okay, that's what you are talking about. I was confused, there was something about a smaller number of mismatched vote or missing ballots altogether. 4.8 million votes that is 1.5 per cent. In 2012 when there were much less controversial candidates 49,000 (about 1%) didn't vote for either. As disgusting as these two were, I am not surprised that 1.5% skipped it. As everyone knows by now, I voted for Johnson who got almost 6 percent in Oklahoma. That is simply another way of voting for none of the above plus a little protest. You can't force people to vote in any office. I left the judges blank because I hadn't studied them and didn't want to ini-meni-mo. I'm sure everyone knew these candidates but many couldn't see either one as President of the United States. You are right about small amount. 1.5% is a small amount.
No one has shown much in this whole controversy. CIA says some friendly nations told them the Putin was behind the DNC hacks. That is not exactly evidence. No one has shown that the DNC hacks was that big of a deal in voting. No one has shown anything about actual voting and no one has even claimed there was any problem only that it is theoretically possible. State authorities both Democrat and Republican find no reason to doubt an honest count.
I can agree with you on this sentiment.
