ADVERTISEMENT

SoCal fires

Just because there were fewer homes, does not mean the fires occurred significantly less often or had less magnitude. There were still many homes there.

Imagine trying to fight one of those fires without the aid of cargo planes or helicopters. It would spread.... well.... like wildfire.
We just witnessed what happens when fire fighters don’t have access to water to fight these fires. Safe to assume LA will now fix those issues?
 
We just witnessed what happens when fire fighters don’t have access to water to fight these fires. Safe to assume LA will now fix those issues?
You just witnessed what happens when wildfires combine with 60-70 mph gusts. Little to do with water availability. More water might have helped some houses / areas, but wouldn't have drastically changed the outcome.

Pretty sad when Al Jazeera has better reporting than whatever news outlet you get your news from...

Why did the fire hydrants run dry?

The rescue efforts in Palisades were hindered by low pressure in the water supply at elevated areas.

Los Angeles receives its water supply from 114 tanks in total, all of which were fully filled before the fires. However, the three water tanks in the elevated Palisades were unable to be refilled due to high demand.

On the morning of January 8, Janisse Quinones, the chief executive of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, told reporters that water tanks in Palisades had been depleted.

“We pushed the system to the extreme,” she said, adding that “four times the normal demand was seen for 15 hours straight, which lowered our water pressure.”

The fire started in the Pacific Palisades neighbourhood at 10:30am (18:30 GMT) on Tuesday, according to Cal Fire. Two of the one million-gallon tanks, located at an elevation in the Palisades, ran out late on Tuesday.

By 3am (11:00 GMT) on Wednesday, the third tank had also run out, Quinones said. Water reserves were located at a lower elevation, which made it difficult to refill the high-elevation tanks.



P.S. Do conservatives all get talking points circulated the day these things happen? You sound exactly like Elon who enjoys lying and misinforming constantly.
 
Last edited:
Ironically, you know what would have helped in this situation and alleviated energy problems for California at the same time?

Pumped hydro energy storage. You could have used the upper reservoir for firefighting. There's no way Hollywood stars would allow that land to be used for that though.
 
You just witnessed what happens when wildfires combine with 60-70 mph gusts. Little to do with water availability. More water might have helped some houses / areas, but wouldn't have drastically changed the outcome.

Pretty sad when Al Jazeera has better reporting than whatever news outlet you get your news from...

Why did the fire hydrants run dry?

The rescue efforts in Palisades were hindered by low pressure in the water supply at elevated areas.

Los Angeles receives its water supply from 114 tanks in total, all of which were fully filled before the fires. However, the three water tanks in the elevated Palisades were unable to be refilled due to high demand.

On the morning of January 8, Janisse Quinones, the chief executive of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, told reporters that water tanks in Palisades had been depleted.

“We pushed the system to the extreme,” she said, adding that “four times the normal demand was seen for 15 hours straight, which lowered our water pressure.”

The fire started in the Pacific Palisades neighbourhood at 10:30am (18:30 GMT) on Tuesday, according to Cal Fire. Two of the one million-gallon tanks, located at an elevation in the Palisades, ran out late on Tuesday.

By 3am (11:00 GMT) on Wednesday, the third tank had also run out, Quinones said. Water reserves were located at a lower elevation, which made it difficult to refill the high-elevation tanks.



P.S. Do conservatives all get talking points circulated the day these things happen? You sound exactly like Elon who enjoys lying and misinforming constantly.
When the LA Fire Chief says city officials failed the fire fighters and people of LA I tend to believe her. Hate it for the people who lost everything . Hopefully those people will lose their jobs over this failure.

I’m also saddened by how many of these fires were intentionally set. What’s a matter with people today?
 
When the LA Fire Chief says city officials failed the fire fighters and people of LA I tend to believe her. Hate it for the people who lost everything . Hopefully those people will lose their jobs over this failure.

I’m also saddened by how many of these fires were intentionally set. What’s a matter with people today?
The fire chief is understandably upset about budget cuts and staff reductions, which she has a right to be.... but this was not a condition which a single municipal fire department was going to fight alone anyway.

The LA Water & Power Department are the ones responsible for filling hydrants. What it looks like is they did the best they could, but ultimately it's very hard to pump water to certain elevations in enough quantity in a short period of time to satisfy demand (with existing infrastructure)
 
Meanwhile... Republicans plan on withholding aid at a federal level.... NEVER AGAIN WILL I ALLOW ANY OF YOU TO BITCH AND MOAN ABOUT A DEMOCRAT WITHOLDING AID TO A REPUBLICAN STATE'S HURRICANE, FLOOD, FIRE, ICE STORM VICTIM ETC....
 
Interesting article in the LA Times argues brush and kindle isn’t the real culprit but housing density and building codes. House density certainly played an issue in not being able to get water to those higher elevations.

It does seem dumb to rebuild all these mega homes in areas where the topography makes it virtually impossible to defend against fires like we just witnessed. Especially with public funds and with the knowledge that people will likely to continue to intentionally set these fires in such areas.

 
Last edited:
Interesting article in the LA Times argues brush and kindle isn’t the real culprit but housing density and building codes. House density certainly played an issue in not being able to get water to those higher elevations.

It does seem dumb to rebuild all these mega homes in areas where the topography makes it virtually impossible to defend against fires like we just witnessed. Especially with public funds and with the knowledge that people will likely to continue to intentionally set these fires in such areas.

Read that article a day or two ago. Agreed that the topography and the building codes don't help.

My advice to folks? Move Middle to Eastern Montana. Kind of barren, but mountains nearby. No real floods. Manageable fire districts. No hurricanes. No Tornadoes. Few Ice Storms. Blizzards are manageable. The only thing those people "worry" about is Yellowstone exploding.
 
Read that article a day or two ago. Agreed that the topography and the building codes don't help.

My advice to folks? Move Middle to Eastern Montana. Kind of barren, but mountains nearby. No real floods. Manageable fire districts. No hurricanes. No Tornadoes. Few Ice Storms. Blizzards are manageable. The only thing those people "worry" about is Yellowstone exploding.
We’re all probably F’d if Yellowstone explodes. They just get it over with a little sooner
 
  • Like
Reactions: astonmartin708
Meanwhile... Republicans plan on withholding aid at a federal level.... NEVER AGAIN WILL I ALLOW ANY OF YOU TO BITCH AND MOAN ABOUT A DEMOCRAT WITHOLDING AID TO A REPUBLICAN STATE'S HURRICANE, FLOOD, FIRE, ICE STORM VICTIM ETC....
Build Back Better/infrastructure bills:
too many social programs,
not enough on Structure
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT