Playing Oklahoma State on Skelly Field has provided some memorable moments for Tulsa Football.
LINK: TU must fire on all cylinders to beat OSU on Saturday
LINK: TU must fire on all cylinders to beat OSU on Saturday
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Playing Oklahoma State on Skelly Field has provided some memorable moments for Tulsa Football.
LINK: TU must fire on all cylinders to beat OSU on Saturday
I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not a 10 point ball game . You can over value the Cowboys all you want , but with the bankroll they have for recruiting their linemen have been average for the last six years. Oregon State and McNeese both stink , so we’ll just have to see how “Little Old Tulsa” stacks up against the big bad “Orange Power”.TU only scored 17 points against the OSU starters. The last TD came against the second team and Freshmen in the fourth quarter garbage time.
Also, while it's true that OSU's wins over ORST and McNeese aren't impressive in and of themselves, but it should be noted that Gundy and Co. have been keeping the offense VERY vanilla. The Pokes haven't yet revealed some of the complexities of their new offense.
I'm sure the coaches would prefer to not have to open up the playbook against Tulsa. But they'll be more than willing to do it should TU put up much of a fight.
TU only scored 17 points against the OSU starters. The last TD came against the second team and Freshmen in the fourth quarter garbage time.
Also, while it's true that OSU's wins over ORST and McNeese aren't impressive in and of themselves, but it should be noted that Gundy and Co. have been keeping the offense VERY vanilla. The Pokes haven't yet revealed some of the complexities of their new offense.
I'm sure the coaches would prefer to not have to open up the playbook against Tulsa. But they'll be more than willing to do it should TU put up much of a fight.
I agree and I also think Tulsa is ready to step up and win tomorrow! With our defense playing hard nose lights out football and Smith throwing dimes at his receivers we can win this game! Let's not forget our offense must open holes and block like they never have before in order for this to happen! WE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN GUYS! JUST DO IT!That is a great article.
The daily Oklahoma had an interview with jenny Carlson and OSUs beat writer and they both basically pushed this game to the side and said they expect ALL osu backups to be in by the 3rd quarter at the latest. I hope our team watches that.
May be talking the same thing, but, Mark Rogers on The Sports Animal picked OSU 30-27...........Personally, I think its going to be a dog fight....this is kind of a trap game for OSU with Texas coming up next weekend.......everyone has been pointing to that game as the key to our season and it always makes me nervous for the game prior when they do that....especially playing a rival type game97.1’s radio guys during the OU show all picked Tulsa to cover FWIW.
The daily Oklahoma had an interview with jenny Carlson and OSUs beat writer and they both basically pushed this game to the side and said they expect ALL osu backups to be in by the 3rd quarter at the latest. I hope our team watches that.
TU only scored 17 points against the OSU starters. The last TD came against the second team and Freshmen in the fourth quarter garbage time.
Also, while it's true that OSU's wins over ORST and McNeese aren't impressive in and of themselves, but it should be noted that Gundy and Co. have been keeping the offense VERY vanilla. The Pokes haven't yet revealed some of the complexities of their new offense.
I'm sure the coaches would prefer to not have to open up the playbook against Tulsa. But they'll be more than willing to do it should TU put up much of a fight.
I also thought you had a chance to win. You were predicted to have about a 20% chance (4 to 1 against). It was about the same chance UCLA had to beat Oklahoma. You even had us concerned for a half. But you guys got out coached.
Gundy and crew went in at half time and made a simple defensive adjustment that completely shut you down in the second half. All he did was pull a safety down into the box to jam up your running lanes. When that worked to stop the runs you were getting in the second quarter, then the other DBs no longer had to keep an eye out for a RB breaking into the third tier, and were able to concentrate on staying with your receivers.
End result, OSU held the Hurricane runners to what? 32 yards in the second half? And 106 yards passing in the second half?
Our resources as one of the winningest P5 programs in the NCAA (#10 this decade), not only affords us better athletes (Hubbard leads the nation in rushing and Wallace leads the nation in receiving), but also allows us to pay for better coaches. Coaches that know how to make half-time adjustments.
See you next year in Stillwater.
I also thought you had a chance to win. You were predicted to have about a 20% chance (4 to 1 against). It was about the same chance UCLA had to beat Oklahoma. You even had us concerned for a half. But you guys got out coached.
Gundy and crew went in at half time and made a simple defensive adjustment that completely shut you down in the second half. All he did was pull a safety down into the box to jam up your running lanes. When that worked to stop the runs you were getting in the second quarter, then the other DBs no longer had to keep an eye out for a RB breaking into the third tier, and were able to concentrate on staying with your receivers.
End result, OSU held the Hurricane runners to what? 32 yards in the second half? And 106 yards passing in the second half?
Our resources as one of the winningest P5 programs in the NCAA (#10 this decade), not only affords us better athletes (Hubbard leads the nation in rushing and Wallace leads the nation in receiving), but also allows us to pay for better coaches. Coaches that know how to make half-time adjustments.
See you next year in Stillwater.
Two of those big plays were called back for ineligible lineman down field, and each time they clearly were, it was not even close......its not the Refs fault, they have to call what they see.....as far as resources, we are similar to the other Big-12 teams aside from OU and Texas, and we generally stay ahead of those other programs, in fact we have dominated Texas ( we have won 5 our of the last 7, 3 in a row) so I think we are doing fine.........I would also like to ask...what has OU proven? They have also play three sub par team, and like us, did exactly what they were supposed to do......a couple notes on them........the Houston QB (King) had a poorer outing against Prairie View A&M's defense then he did against OU's, and if there is a team in the Pac-12 weaker than Oregon state, it is UCLA, they are horrible ......Also allows you those big 12 officials huh? Evert big play we had just SOMEHOW got called back, but I guess that was those million dollar halftime adjustments. Honestly, with your resources you should be much better than you are. But it is what it is. You’re nothing compared to OU so you gotta take it out on someone huh.
I don't think anyone is questioning scheduling UCLA or Oregon State. Those series were probably agreed to 7-8 years ago and there is simply no way to project how good or bad a particular team will be that far out. However the whole South Dakota/McNeese State scheduling is questionable. And no one is questioning OSU's playing a game at an in-state school. Bonus points for going on the road against an AAC team. More P5 schools are doing it and more get credit when they win those games rather than looked down on. The game was obviously closer than the final score.Two of those big plays were called back for ineligible lineman down field, and each time they clearly were, it was not even close......its not the Refs fault, they have to call what they see.....as far as resources, we are similar to the other Big-12 teams aside from OU and Texas, and we generally stay ahead of those other programs, in fact we have dominated Texas ( we have won 5 our of the last 7, 3 in a row) so I think we are doing fine.........I would also like to ask...what has OU proven? They have also play three sub par team, and like us, did exactly what they were supposed to do......a couple notes on them........the Houston QB (King) had a poorer outing against Prairie View A&M's defense then he did against OU's, and if there is a team in the Pac-12 weaker than Oregon state, it is UCLA, they are horrible ......
I don't think anyone is questioning scheduling UCLA or Oregon State. Those series were probably agreed to 7-8 years ago and there is simply no way to project how good or bad a particular team will be that far out. However the whole South Dakota/McNeese State scheduling is questionable. And no one is questioning OSU's playing a game at an in-state school. Bonus points for going on the road against an AAC team. More P5 schools are doing it and more get credit when they win those games rather than looked down on. The game was obviously closer than the final score.
BTW, ESPN rebroadcast the game last night and I watched the 1st half. The unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Trevis in the 1st half was complete garbage. How you pick one player out of that to give a penalty to is very questionable. And the stoppage in the 2Q when TU was running the ball down OSU's throat and had them gassed was also questionable. Even the ESPN crew had trouble figuring out why the side judge stopped the action and even noted that TU fans were upset and the analyst was like "They should be, that's the only thing slowing them down right now".
There were also two huge Unsportsmanlike penalties against OSU , that no one can explain, ....one we had stopped you on third down, the play was over both teams totally separated almost back to each other's bench, and they threw a flag and you guys got a first down....so it happened both ways..........right after we stopped you on 4th down we got the ball back on our 10, we ran a play for no gain, then got a delay of game penalty......go re watch that play......they set the play clock back to 25 seconds instead of 40........it happens both waysI don't think anyone is questioning scheduling UCLA or Oregon State. Those series were probably agreed to 7-8 years ago and there is simply no way to project how good or bad a particular team will be that far out. However the whole South Dakota/McNeese State scheduling is questionable. And no one is questioning OSU's playing a game at an in-state school. Bonus points for going on the road against an AAC team. More P5 schools are doing it and more get credit when they win those games rather than looked down on. The game was obviously closer than the final score.
BTW, ESPN rebroadcast the game last night and I watched the 1st half. The unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Trevis in the 1st half was complete garbage. How you pick one player out of that to give a penalty to is very questionable. And the stoppage in the 2Q when TU was running the ball down OSU's throat and had them gassed was also questionable. Even the ESPN crew had trouble figuring out why the side judge stopped the action and even noted that TU fans were upset and the analyst was like "They should be, that's the only thing slowing them down right now".
Other than having the last two Heisman winners with a third seemingly on his way, not much I guess.I would also like to ask...what has OU proven?
You are smart enough to know that has nothing to do with how they do this year.........they still have not played anyone........in fact OSU and OUs schedules are almost identical as far as strength of competition, and both schools did exactly what was expected...........I want to see OSU actually play someone ( not saying Tulsa is a nobody, it was a bigtime trap game for us and we usually get your best shot) and they will this week, and I want to see OU play someone, which we have to wait a few more weeks.........Other than having the last two Heisman winners with a third seemingly on his way, not much I guess.
Yah.....and the face mask was bogus and the linemen downfield, and the off sides and chop block.....Gundy doctored the actual game broadcastYep. Gundy had the officials in his pocket. It was very obvious. The penalty on Trevis was unreal bad.
Yah.....and the face mask was bogus and the linemen downfield, and the off sides and chop block.....Gundy doctored the actual game broadcast
[QUOTE.="SouthTulsaPoke, post: 264206, member: 6277"]TU only scored 17 points against the OSU starters. The last TD came against the second team and Freshmen in the fourth quarter garbage time.
Also, while it's true that OSU's wins over ORST and McNeese aren't impressive in and of themselves, but it should be noted that Gundy and Co. have been keeping the offense VERY vanilla. The Pokes haven't yet revealed some of the complexities of their new offense.
I'm sure the coaches would prefer to not have to open up the playbook against Tulsa. But they'll be more than willing to do it should TU put up much of a fight.
I don't think anyone is questioning scheduling UCLA or Oregon State. Those series were probably agreed to 7-8 years ago and there is simply no way to project how good or bad a particular team will be that far out. However the whole South Dakota/McNeese State scheduling is questionable. And no one is questioning OSU's playing a game at an in-state school. Bonus points for going on the road against an AAC team. More P5 schools are doing it and more get credit when they win those games rather than looked down on. The game was obviously closer than the final score.
BTW, ESPN rebroadcast the game last night and I watched the 1st half. The unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Trevis in the 1st half was complete garbage. How you pick one player out of that to give a penalty to is very questionable. And the stoppage in the 2Q when TU was running the ball down OSU's throat and had them gassed was also questionable. Even the ESPN crew had trouble figuring out why the side judge stopped the action and even noted that TU fans were upset and the analyst was like "They should be, that's the only thing slowing them down right now".
I'm not a huge Gooner fan, but they played a solid Houston squad, and I'll bet when they signed the contact with UCLA both thought it would be a marquee name (surprise, UCLA SUCKS!). South Dakota was a joke of course. They'll have some challenges in the Big 12. You've got to remember that significant minutes have been played by the the Gooner back up QB. Don't think the pokes have had that same lucurt.You are smart enough to know that has nothing to do with how they do this year.........they still have not played anyone........in fact OSU and OUs schedules are almost identical as far as strength of competition, and both schools did exactly what was expected...........I want to see OSU actually play someone ( not saying Tulsa is a nobody, it was a bigtime trap game for us and we usually get your best shot) and they will this week, and I want to see OU play someone, which we have to wait a few more weeks.........
I was just answering your question. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:You are smart enough to know that has nothing to do with how they do this year
The same 1-3 Houston team?...........if there is a team in the Pac-12 weaker than Oregon state, it would be UCLA.......I'm not a huge Gooner fan, but they played a solid Houston squad, and I'll bet when they signed the contact with UCLA both thought it would be a marquee name (surprise, UCLA SUCKS!). South Dakota was a joke of course. They'll have some challenges in the Big 12. You've got to remember that significant minutes have been played by the the Gooner back up QB. Don't think the pokes have had that same lucurt.