Say TU beats Memphis and loses in semifinal. Do you take Monmouth with SOS of 166, 5 top100 kenpom wins, 3 sub200 losses, and 16 sub200 wins? Or TU with SOS of 71, 1 sub100 loss, 9 top100 wins, 8 sub200 wins? Not asking who you think committee will take but who you think they should take.
Obviously, you could say take both and leave out Syracuse, Pit, South Carolina, USC, etc. I would not disagree but for purposes of this question, limit it to Monmouth or TU.
I say TU has the better resume but historically most of you would go the other way and say the little guy from the smaller conference deserves a break. Does your tune change now that TU is in a major conference?
Obviously, you could say take both and leave out Syracuse, Pit, South Carolina, USC, etc. I would not disagree but for purposes of this question, limit it to Monmouth or TU.
I say TU has the better resume but historically most of you would go the other way and say the little guy from the smaller conference deserves a break. Does your tune change now that TU is in a major conference?