I thought he was a curious hire since he'd never made it to the tournament and had never been the best coach in a lower conference. Since he's been here, we've seen why I assume he was hired. He's literally pretty much the perfect coach, except for on court performance. He's a team player, funny and personable, willing to go out of his way for the university. A great member of the university community. But his coaching is lacking. Smart organizations though don't just fire or throw away employees with a lot of potential. They invest in them, try to build them up. Give them a high performing mentor, a coach, pay for classes, etc. I think it makes perfect sense for us to invest in Konkol to try to up skill him given what great upside he has elsewhere. He could become the kind of coach that we don't have the ability to hire. I'm fine giving that a shot.