The Dems challenged the last two Republicans who were elected President so not really as outrageous or uncommon as people make it out to be.
One thing I found interesting is that Patrick Byrne leaked a tweet alleging fake ballots were found in a warehouse Georgia along with shredding trucks allegedly picking these ballots up after being discovered and shredded. It’s unproven if the video reveals his narrative however before the video was released, he texted out that fraud had been found and they needed to go through the lawyers before revealing more. Why would he have to do that? You and I can take a video of anything right now and post it. We don’t need lawyers. If I’m a betting man, I bet there is a federal investigation going on behind the scenes.
Thanks for the links. So after listening, what laws were broken during the conversation?
flip.it
Im no lawyer but based on what has been released, that would be extremely hard to sell. I wonder why the lady who Trump accused of committing fraud hasn’t sued for defamation yet. I know I would if I were her.
52 U.S. Code § 20511 - Criminal penalties
www.law.cornell.edu
52 USC Sec. 20511. And others.
The crap thing is that Biden correctly assumes that everybody would assume the vengeance thing. The focus wouldn't be on the right thing. The right thing would be stopping a future Trump from trying this same crap again. It really needs to be done, but won't due to politics, Trump's base, and Biden wanting to get something done besides get into the morass again. A lot of crap needs to be reset after Trump.
I fail to recall Gore, Kerry, or Clinton trying to organize this kind of resistance. No congressman or Senator objected to any electoral slate from Trump or Bush.
Which is truly ironic that Nixon acted with virtue and selflessness as Kennedy and Johnson brazenly stole the election.
He'll(Shon) throw out anything.
You are wrong! 😂 The Executive Order passed by POTUS in 2018 stated that any election information is a matter of National Security and stipulates that all discussions had for the purpose of settling litigation are confidential under federal and state law. The Secret Service absolutely has jurisdiction in accordance with the Executive Order. He at the minimum would be investigated for leaking classified information however his email sent to a foreign country is what caused the espionage act to be pursued. I know you don’t know that so I try to make it plain!
You must not have read the entire article I cited. Several people were officially involved in the call who weren't cleared for classified information, thus it couldn't be classified.
www.federalregister.gov
It hasn't already started, unless you consider the threat, already started.
I’ll agree to those items if I can add one. You have to take a test to verify that you have the knowledge and understanding of history, civics and domestic / foreign events to make an educated decision regarding your vote. Having one person vote for something detrimental to society without understanding why their vote is detrimental is just as bad as having one dead person vote. Neither should be voting.
Including you. Lol
If we want to optimize the quality of the results in our elections, it wouldn’t be insure that all votes carry equal weight, but also that all votes are made by people who are capable of making important decisions. To take this to an extreme, at the moment, a mentally disabled person who can’t handle much more than collecting trays at McDonald’s has the same weight of vote as you do on who should be controlling the world’s most powerful military its a vast array of nuclear weapons as well as who can best handle a complex domestic and international economy.
Data has supported the fact that inhibitions to voting (making voting more difficult) lessens turnout. That’s the exact reason that Republicans have supported ID laws because they want to suppress turnout. (And we’ve seen the results when they’re not as successful in suppressing turnout this year)
Usiing this post you might not be qualified to vote.
Yes you're talking about several variations on a theme in which those that rule and those that vote on those that rule, all fit within similar dictates. A Democratic Meritocracy, Geniocracy, Timocracy, Noocracy, etc., or some combination of the above. All depending on how you wish to define your requirements for running for office, and voting on those running for office. All of those have that single defining flaw that you talk about, where do you draw the line, and who determines whether you are over or under the line.(Everything isn't as black & white as the originator of those rules likes to thinks.)
You left Reagan off that list. Iran-Contra, until Trump, was the worse abuse of power and corruption since Reconstruction and the days of Andrew Johnson. Had it occurred in the digital age, Reagan, Bush, Sr. and half the Dept. of Defense would have gone down. There's no way a Lt. Colonel is making any of those decisions on his own, and to my knowledge he was the highest ranking official to have been taken down.
