Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So far all I know about is CSU in BOK and ORU at the Don Rey.Do we know who we have at home in ooc yet?
I'm sure we will find a tournament for us to play Illinois State somewhere..
I do have one question.....Are the draws from previous years taken into account or is it blind each year?
I’ve never understood why anyone complains about conference scheduling. Maybe because there’s nothing else happening at this point in the offseason. There’s some marginal benefits to matching the top teams and keeping them away from ECU/Tulane, so I’m fine with that strategy.
The problem is its marginal and they might as well throw darts for the prediction process.
Don't worry bout him, his posts only contain 58% of the facts. Now let's watch him backpedal through his explanation.Since Tulsa joined the league, there have been 57 total preseason predictions. 33 of those predictions (58%) were correct within 1 spot of the team's final KenPom. Only 5 times has a team ever finished more than 3 spots from their predicted finish. The mean absolute deviation of those predictions was 0.32 spots. The mean absolute percent error is 7.7%.
tl:dr You must be really good at darts.
Since Tulsa joined the league, there have been 57 total preseason predictions. 33 of those predictions (58%) were correct within 1 spot of the team's final KenPom. Only 5 times has a team ever finished more than 3 spots from their predicted finish. The mean absolute deviation of those predictions was 0.32 spots. The mean absolute percent error is 7.7%.
tl:dr You must be really good at darts.
Don't worry bout him, his posts only contain 58% of the facts. Now let's watch him backpedal through his explanation.
Scott Farkas...has beady little yellow eyes. Yellow eyes!You know it's amazing how often you join in but do little of your own fighting.
Reminds me of someone....
I'm sorry, did you say within one spot? That's not a bullseye. How many of those predictions were on the money?
When did the NCAA start using kenpom?
How many of those within one spot were people voting Tulane, ECU, and USF last?
What was the range of those rankings? Because top 100 is top 100 to the committee as far as how view teams for quality games ( I know it's different for home or away just trying to keep the discussion general).
There are lies, there are damn lies, then there are statistics.
Numbers don't lie, but they will give you the wrong answer if you don't know what questions you should ask.
Common sports example:
Fbs football makes more revenue, so it's better right? Somehow we still have more basketball schools and no schools who have football but not basketball. But the revenue.....
13/57 (22.7%) were exactly correct.
They added KenPom to team sheets in 2017. More importantly, the correlation coefficient between KenPom and NET was 0.985 last year. The NCAA's new pet metric is a dumbed down version of KenPom.
10/33. The most accurate predictions have been Cincinnati, Tulsa, SMU, and ECU. The least accurate have been UConn, UCF, and Houston.
That's incorrect. You chose top 100 as your arbitrary cutoff because there were 4 AAC teams ranked between 76-100 last year, but the actual cutoff for Q1 road wins is top 75 and the lowest ranked team to make the NCAA tournament was St. John's at 73.
Meaningless platitudes.