I don't like throwing players under the bus (though the academic angle here opens it up somewhat). The main guy making the bucks has ultimate responsibility.
I have always believed that coaches accept responsibility and the media points the blame or makes the excuses.I don't like throwing players under the bus (though the academic angle here opens it up somewhat). The main guy making the bucks has ultimate responsibility.
Every away game the announcers talk about their discussions with Haith that day. He is working them hard. ( single digit losses, losing KES, lots of new players, record would have been 16-8 with a couple of points here and there, etc).
The good news when losing a coach after two or three years after he hasIt is not bad news to lose a coach after 2 years. Just means we made the NCAA. I would rather have three years though as that really makes a program.
Yeah, you're right....Trouble is, when you have so few set plays to startBy this point in the season, the team should look like it has a clue. The team should look like the talent is there to compete in the future. And, the team should at least be able to pick off the bottom feeders of the American..
I dont see any of that.