ADVERTISEMENT

This board explained?

WATU2

I.T.S. Hall of Famer
May 29, 2001
13,093
200
63
First....
There Are Big Differences Between
Republicans and Republicans Who Watch Fox News





·




On almost every
category of political and social importance, Republicans and the smaller set of
Republicans who watch Fox News have significantly differing opinions and
understandings of the world, a recent study shows.

The June 2014 study comes courtesy the Public Religion Research
Institute/Brookings Institute and ostensibly focuses on opinions on immigration
reform. But the most interesting numbers include the impact of Fox News on
shaping the reform debate.

According to the
surveys, "Only 42% of
Republicans who most trust Fox News to provide accurate information about politics and current events support a path
to citizenship, compared to 60% of Republicans who most trust other news sources."
Overall, 51 percent of Republicans support creating a path to citizenship,
giving a nine percentage point edge in each direction depending on whether the
respondent goes to Fox for their news.

That Fox News-infused
opinion isn't just seen on immigration reform, though. On almost every polling
question ? raising the minimum wage, gay marriage, Obama's approval ?
Republicans who trust Fox News above other sources had less progressive views
than those who most trusted another TV news source.


2.....
Accuracy-Climate-Science-Segments-Cable-News-Networks-2013-Chart1.jpg

Survey: NPR's listeners best-informed, Fox viewers worst-informed


Updated
May 23, 2012
7:58 am

Fairleigh Dickinson University


People who watch no news at all can answer more questions about
international current events than people who watch cable news, a survey
by Fairleigh Dickinson University's PublicMind finds.
NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most
informative news outlets, while exposure to partisan sources, such as
Fox News and MSNBC, has a negative impact on people's current events
knowledge.

People who watch MSNBC and CNN exclusively can answer more questions
about domestic events than people who watch no news at all. People who
only watch Fox did much worse. NPR listeners answered more questions
correctly than people in any other category.

The survey of 1185 random people conducted by landline and cell phone in early February follows a similar FDU poll conducted last November.



Each respondent was asked four of eight questions, which are at the
bottom of this post. "On average, people were able to answer correctly
1.8 of 4 questions about international news, and 1.6 of 5 questions
about domestic affairs," the report says. Here's the breakdown by
viewing habits.



The report explains:
The largest effect is that of Fox News: all else being
equal, someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer
just 1.04 domestic questions correctly ? a figure which is
significantly worse than if they had reported watching no media at all.
On the other hand, if they listened only to NPR, they would be
expected to answer 1.51 questions correctly; viewers of Sunday morning
talk shows fare similarly well. And people watching only The Daily Show
with Jon Stewart could answer about 1.42 questions correctly.

Interestingly, the results of the poll controlled for partisanship.
MSNBC, Fox and talk radio consumers answered more questions correctly
when their political views aligned with those of the outlets they
preferred. Moderates and liberals who watched only Fox did worse than
conservatives who watched it. This mirrored the results at MSNBC, where a
conservative viewer could be expected to answer an average of .71
international questions correctly, for example, and a liberal viewer
could be expected to answer 1.89 questions correctly. "None of the other
news media had effects that depended on ideology," says the report.
"On average, people were able to
answer correctly 1.8 of 4 questions about international news, and 1.6 of
5 questions about domestic affairs," but depending on the match between
ideology and viewing habits, the score could be lower or higher.


FDU political scientist Dan Cassino said the results show
"Ideological news sources, like Fox and MSNBC, are really just talking
to one audience…. This is solid evidence that if you're not in that
audience, you're not going to get anything out of watching them."

News organizations' tone and allocation of resources also apparently
affected respondents' abilities to answer questions. NPR has as many
domestic bureaus as foreign ones; its listeners did best on questions
about international events. "Daily Show" viewers were next. On domestic
questions, people who watched Sunday news shows did nearly as well as
NPR listeners.

Questions: (all but the first two were open-ended)

? To the best of your knowledge, have the opposition groups protesting in Egypt been successful in removing Hosni Mubarak?

? How about the opposition groups in Syria? Have they been successful in removing Bashar al-Assad?

? Some countries in Europe are deeply in debt, and have had to be bailed
out by other countries. To the best of your knowledge, which country
has had to spend the most money to bail out European countries?

? There have been increasing talks about economic sanctions against Iran. What are these sanctions supposed to do?

? Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives right now?

? In December, House Republicans agreed to a short-term extension of a
payroll tax cut, but only if President Obama agreed to do what?

? It took a long time to get the final results of the Iowa caucuses for
Republican candidates. In the end, who was declared the winner?

? How about the New Hampshire Primary? Which Republican won that race?

? According to official figures, about what percentage of Americans are currently unemployed?

4. A 2010 Stanford University survey found "more exposure to Fox News was
associated with more rejection of many mainstream scientists' claims
about global warming, [and] with less trust in scientists".
A 2011 Kaiser Family Foundation survey on U.S. misperceptions about
health care reform found that Fox News viewers had a poorer
understanding of the new laws and were more likely to believe in
falsehoods about the Affordable Care Act such as cuts to Medicare benefits and the death panel myth. A 2010 Ohio State University study of public misperceptions about the so-called "Ground Zero Mosque", officially named Park51
found that viewers who relied on Fox News were 66% more likely to
believe incorrect rumors than those with a "low reliance" on Fox News.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies#cite_note-74

 
Its hard to discuss politics with a socialist since they "know so much that simply isn't so". MSNBC viewers who watch the likes of Al Sharpton, Mathews, Ed (slut) Schultz etc and who had to fire several on their staff that completely embarrassed themselves and the NBC brand over statements they made, must really be proud. Crying on the air, emabarrassing confrontations on the street and ridiculous "mispeaks" (like funny feelings coming up their leg when Obama was elected). Yeah MSNBC has a lot to be proud of. Anyone who thinks their audience is smart or gifted is ideologically blind.

BTW, the audience MSNBC serves is so miniscule compared to FOXN that this obviously biased and pointedly prejudiced "study" can't be accurate by any stretch of the imagination. For instance the ratings for FXN is greater than the ratings of all other primetime news combined (mostly cable).

MSNBC is the gift that keeps on giving. Thanks for bringing this up!
This post was edited on 6/10 9:33 PM by rabidTU
 
Thanks for the chuckle chuckle today.. I needed it.

Look out!!! Charlie's in the trees!!!
 
I remember when Neilsen ratings (of cable news prime time programming) mentioned there were more fans at the Ohio State Penn St and Michigan football games that week than had watched Piers Morgan (CNN) and L O'Donnell (MSNBC) the next Monday afterwards. If your content is so outlandish, so boring or so uninformative that there is no audience, you simply have little or no effect on the discussion. But my question is why are there so few watching these programs? When FXN started years ago, their main competition was CNN who had something in the order of 17 times the number of viewers. Now FXN on average has five to 6 times the number that watch them over CNN who basically is in second place most days. Why? My guess is that those who care the most about the direction of the country are looking for something that may give them hope for their kids future. Its like the gun ownership spike. Attention has shifted under BHO to survival and the future of their way of life.
 
You might google "Liberals Fall for Hoax "Study" Claiming Fox News Viewers Are mentally Deficient" - Newsbusters, Mathew Sheffield. It pretty much debunks WATU's "supposed" study at Farleigh Dickinson as a hoax. I couldn't get it to come through. But if you google it, it probably will.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT