Hey Hillary, Mr. Comey says...

[TUMe]

FBI Director James Comey said he doesn’t know what "security inquiry" means -- adding, “We’re conducting an investigation. … That’s what we do.” The FBI director reiterated that he’s “not familiar with the term security inquiry” when told that is the phrase Clinton has used.

 

[TUMe]

I don't know what a "security inquiry" would look like, but probably they wouldn't give someone immunity in exchange for talking.

 

[aTUfan]

Person of interest vs suspect?

 

[WATU2]

IOW guilty until proven innocent and unable to be proven innocent. The Trump approach?

 

[TUMe]

IOW guilty until proven innocent and unable to be proven innocent. The Trump approach?

I don't know if she is guilty or not but she sure is "guilty" of making up a new category to explain what is going on. The FBI doesn't do security audits. Hillary and her staff have used a imaginary term to describe what is going on. It is more proof that Hillary is challenged by the truth. I don't give a tinkers damn for Trump. He is in a civil suit and I hope he loses.

 

[TU 1978]

The convention will be a mess if she's indicted this summer. We may still get to feel the Bern.

 

[eastcane]

I don't know if she is guilty or not but she sure is "guilty" of making up a new category to explain what is going on. The FBI doesn't do security audits. Hillary and her staff have used a imaginary term to describe what is going on. It is more proof that Hillary is challenged by the truth. I don't give a tinkers damn for Trump. He is in a civil suit and I hope he loses.

Trump is your candidate.

 

[TUMe]

Trump is your candidate.

Brilliant discourse.

 

[eastcane]

Brilliant candidate, good luck with that. By the way, Trump also doesn't believe man is causing our earth's rapid warming, just like you TUME, you have much in common.

 

[WATU2]

Trump's brings a private sector mentality to the campaign. He is wealthy because he dropped his mistakes like hot rocks (failed airlines, casinos, mortgage, vodka, university, steaks, etc etc) often with bankruptcy absolution. No looking back. On the campaign trail, he is shameless in just saying stuff and changing later. Gets a pass. He has no personal history other than the one he tells.
Public office is different. Every mistake is a permanent club for the opposition and any change in explanation a lie, particularly when repeated for decades.

Given those advantages, which are working here, Trump should be the odds on favorite.

 

[WATU2]

I don't know if she is guilty or not but she sure is "guilty" of making up a new category to explain what is going on. The FBI doesn't do security audits. Hillary and her staff have used a imaginary term to describe what is going on. It is more proof that Hillary is challenged by the truth. I don't give a tinkers damn for Trump. He is in a civil suit and I hope he loses.

IOW. Guilty guilty guilty

 

[TUMe]

IOW. Guilty guilty guilty

Ha ha. Misrepresent. I said I didn't know if she was guilty of a crime but she was guilty of twisting the facts, much like you just did with my post. There is a huge difference in the former which you can go to jail for and the later which is merely a character fault which is worth considering but not punishable.

 

[TUMe]

Brilliant candidate, good luck with that. By the way, Trump also doesn't believe man is causing our earth's rapid warming, just like you TUME, you have much in common.

I have a lot in common with Charles Manson. We eat, sleep, and talk.

You have a lot in common with Hillary in that you believe anything a Democrat does is great or at least okay to ignore.

I'm not going to waste thread space arguing whether CO2 from man is the only cause of climate change and whether it will destroy the planet.

Both candidates are terribly flawed. By the way Eastcane, both you and I have a lot in common. Both of us waste a lot of our time arguing with people who aren't going to change their mind in state that is going to give its electoral votes to someone we don't want.