I Did use the words unlawfully overthrow.....don’t forget, this rhetoric started a yr ago from the Dems well before election discussion ever started. Only in the last two months did the whole mail in voter topic really heat up, exposing a possible reason to contest election results. There was no need for these statements at that time and no indication that Trump was in any danger of not being re-elected. (Realistically why would Trump who is billionaire subjugate himself and family to that when he has way more power outside of his office to guide the country than he ever will while in office) Fast forward to two months ago and now you have The NY Times reporting that the Dems were war gaming a state secession plan again involving the military. This was no doubt leaked to the press to gain popular support from the public. Clinton has stated multiple times that if the Dems don’t win, they should contest no matter what. This is not just rhetoric. World leaders regularly tell you what they intend to do to measure the populous reaction/response. If they get too much resistance, they change tactics. ....what I find interesting is that if the elections are contested and no outcome can be reached in a timely manner, the constitution is written so that the Pelosi would assume the Presidency for a yr. She and the Dems know this so why would they be asking for assistance from the military? The intel election security brief move is the key piece to of all of this. Twisting and manipulating intel has been a key tool in any parties ability to sway public opinion (Iraq WMD). If you remove that mechanism, it becomes really hard to validate a parties actions or rhetoric.