I agree with TUMe that we shouldn't necessarily respond to climate change as if the most dire predictions are 100% true, but I also agree with you that it is also dangerous to assume that the models showing we have 100 years to respond are true.If climate change were ‘natural’ the changes would not be occurring at the rates they are which would allow for adjustments.
As you point climate science may project a range of different projected outcomes, but none are salutary.
Addressing the risks of man made climate change offers us a huge set of new opportunities, yet US policies and public investments largely ignore them compared to other countries among our peer group.
In the ethical terms you suggest, is it ethical for the US to continue to produce twice the carbon emissions than China, yet complain about Chinese pollution?
Or is it ethical to actively import pollution from other countries that undermine the health of Americans. See link
What Could Happen if a $9.4 Billion Chemical Plant Comes to “Cancer Alley”
https://www.propublica.org/article/...-billion-chemical-plant-comes-to-cancer-alley
There is a middle ground in there somewhere. Investing in solar and nuclear power is something we can do and should do. China is building tons of coal plants, yes. But they are also part of a multi-national agreement which in aggregate should keep CO2 levels at manageable quantities. Those plants are already accounted for in that. And they already are investing WAY more money into solar than we are. If we do not act soon, they will be the undisputed world leaders in solar power pretty quickly. And whether you believe in global warming or not, you'd be a damn fool to not believe that solar power will be an increasingly important and vital source of energy production in future decades. And it will be hard to push them off that pedestal just because "American Ingenuity".
Telling developing nations that they can't pursue the cheapest source of power available is a pretty cruel thing to do. We're not going to get the Rwandans to hold off on a coal plant in lieu of nuclear or solar energy. But we can probably influence the Chinese some. If only we were working on a big trade agreement and could ask the Chinese to hold off on some of those plants and invest in cleaner options instead, and in exchange we can import more xyz to help offset the cost without giving a foreign country a direct subsidy.