No one tried to impeach a private citizen. Clearly you are one of the people I hear about being completely ignorant when it comes to civics and the constitution.
I like that! 😂😂😂😂😂👍🏽 A young, very inexperienced guy, full of testosterone, looking to show off his interpretation of the constitution he learned from his liberal (Confucius infiltrated) university. Young man, if you would like to discuss civics and the constitution, I would be more than happy to do that with you. 😂 Where would you like to start?
First off, I know a lot more about you than you think 😂. You might want to stay off certain sites. Those cookies are bad for you! If you think you are anonymous think again! The Dem lawyers who argued the case against Mr Trump stated that just because there had never been a situation where a former President now private citizen was tried, doesn’t mean it’s not constitutional. That was their interpretation of constitutional law. However, not even the Cheif Justice of the Supreme Court agreed with that interpretation and declined to preside over the trial. They had no standing and ended up getting caught fabricating evidence which is a federal crime! I’m sure if somehow they would have been able to impeach, the precedent would have been established to try a private citizen, but since they lost their case, there is no precedent and still must be considered unconstitutional. No conspiracy theories there young guy! Does Goodnight mean your coming back? I sure hope so! I will be waiting! 😉
😂 Constitutional under the Raskins Law right? I know the Dems want to rewrite history and change the constitution but thank God there are still politicians willing to push back against the stupidity!
