There are many ways to measure a team's performance, with wins & losses being the most obvious. However, to look at a relative strength of a program over several years, I believe Sagarin ratings are an objective measure. Vegas uses Sagarin ratings in setting lines. You take the difference in 2 teams ratings & factor in homefield advantage & you will usually come within a point or 2 of the opening betting line on a game. For example, our current rating is 48.41. If we played a team rated at 68.41, we would be 20 point underdogs on a neutral field. The ratings are usually pretty accurate after the first half of the season is played.
Anyway, here are Tulsa's End of Season Sagarin Football Ratings over the last several seasons :
2014 (2-10) 48.41 #154 Blankenship yr. 4
2013 (3-9) 55.86 #132 Blankenship yr. 3
2012 (11-3) 75.81 #47 Blankenship yr. 2
2011 (8-5) 77.02 #35 Blankenship yr. 1
2010 (10-3) 78.03 #35 Graham yr. 4
2009 (5-7) 63.96 #96 Graham yr. 3
2008 (11-3) 75.98 #42 Graham yr. 2
2007 (10-4) 70.69 #65 Graham yr. 1
2006 (8-5) 69.37 #65 Kragthorpe yr. 4
2005 (9-4) 75.04 #44 Kragthorpe yr. 3
2004 (4-8) 63.02 #105 Kragthorpe yr. 2
2003 (8-5) 66.48 #76 Kragthorpe yr. 1
2002 (1-11) 47.16 #166 Burns yr. 3
2001 (1-10) 43.33 #162 Burns yr. 2
2000 (5-7) 59.67 #106 Burns yr. 1
1999 (2-9) 51.34 #132 Rader's last yr.
A couple of points : -the ratings (#) includes 1-AA teams. That 's why we can be rated as low as 166.
- We actually rated even lower in 2014 than 2013. The only worse years since 1999 were Burns last 2 years.
- A coaching change CAN make an immediate difference.
- Only TU coaches who have been or will be fired have had seasons in the 50s or 40s on Sagarin.
I am posting this for perspective on where we've been & where we are today, not for arguing that change is needed. I believe that decision has already been made.
Anyway, here are Tulsa's End of Season Sagarin Football Ratings over the last several seasons :
2014 (2-10) 48.41 #154 Blankenship yr. 4
2013 (3-9) 55.86 #132 Blankenship yr. 3
2012 (11-3) 75.81 #47 Blankenship yr. 2
2011 (8-5) 77.02 #35 Blankenship yr. 1
2010 (10-3) 78.03 #35 Graham yr. 4
2009 (5-7) 63.96 #96 Graham yr. 3
2008 (11-3) 75.98 #42 Graham yr. 2
2007 (10-4) 70.69 #65 Graham yr. 1
2006 (8-5) 69.37 #65 Kragthorpe yr. 4
2005 (9-4) 75.04 #44 Kragthorpe yr. 3
2004 (4-8) 63.02 #105 Kragthorpe yr. 2
2003 (8-5) 66.48 #76 Kragthorpe yr. 1
2002 (1-11) 47.16 #166 Burns yr. 3
2001 (1-10) 43.33 #162 Burns yr. 2
2000 (5-7) 59.67 #106 Burns yr. 1
1999 (2-9) 51.34 #132 Rader's last yr.
A couple of points : -the ratings (#) includes 1-AA teams. That 's why we can be rated as low as 166.
- We actually rated even lower in 2014 than 2013. The only worse years since 1999 were Burns last 2 years.
- A coaching change CAN make an immediate difference.
- Only TU coaches who have been or will be fired have had seasons in the 50s or 40s on Sagarin.
I am posting this for perspective on where we've been & where we are today, not for arguing that change is needed. I believe that decision has already been made.