You want to talk about movements intent on subverting the ideals of first amendment....
If you can't see that this type of rhetoric pushes the boundaries of the establishment clause (and it's precedented interpretation by the SC), then you have something wrong with you. Not that the SC finds any merit in precedent these days...
Imagine how you would feel about this if you were Muslim, Hindi, Jewish, Non-Christian Native American, Atheist etc... Using every "authority as governor" to not only dedicate State owned land to a deity you may not believe in.... but also the land that YOU OWN to a god you don't believe in.
If you can't see that this type of rhetoric pushes the boundaries of the establishment clause (and it's precedented interpretation by the SC), then you have something wrong with you. Not that the SC finds any merit in precedent these days...
Imagine how you would feel about this if you were Muslim, Hindi, Jewish, Non-Christian Native American, Atheist etc... Using every "authority as governor" to not only dedicate State owned land to a deity you may not believe in.... but also the land that YOU OWN to a god you don't believe in.
Last edited: