Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like Pubs have a favorability rating 11 points higher than Congress overall 😂😂😂Are Congressional Republicans held in higher regard than Biden?
The Republicans in Congress favorability
The Republicans in Congress favorability
Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the following political groups? [the Republicans in Congress]today.yougov.com
Each side values their own side. Neither value the other.Looks like Pubs have a favorability rating 11 points higher than Congress overall 😂😂😂
Congress and the Public
Do you approve or disapprove of the way [ROTATED -- The Republicans in Congress. The Democrats in Congress.] are handling their job? Do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job?news.gallup.com
right now, congress members only represent their party.Congress has received low approval ratings for as long as I can remember. Then the people giving those low ratings turn around and vote for their current congressman. Go figure.
They have to get reelected, over and over. What is it about term limits that would change it from representing their party, to representing their voters. Once again logic seems to fail you.right now, congress members only represent their party.
with term limits ther could represent their voters.
That rivals many of Trump's speeches for incoherence.
Agreed. For example:Each side values their own side. Neither value the other.
Remember the days when FB and Twitter not only censored this story but suspended accounts for reporting on the same….and the left supported it. Same pattern as suggesting Covid originated in a lab.
How can anyone not see that Biden is senile. Heck even democrats in Congress know it. His approval rate continues to fall with the average person.
That wasn’t any more or less of an embarrassment than the Soviets retreat from the same region was.
I agree that the Russians had to regroup, but that was actually accomplished by Ukraine soldiers with unusual guts. Also, sloppy production by Russian troops.That rivals many of Trump's speeches for incoherence.
As long as it's not somebody like Ocasio Cortez or Marjorie Taylor Greene, I'm ok with that.You are glad to bring Trump in for a roasting. In my opinion, Neither Trump nor Biden will be elected in the next presidential election.
My comment about regrouping was regarding the Soviets retreating from Afghanistan in the 80’s.How can anyone not see that Biden is senile. Heck even democrats in Congress know it. His approval rate continues to fall with the average person.
I agree that the Russians had to regroup, but that was actually accomplished by Ukraine soldiers with unusual guts. Also, sloppy production by Russian troops.
You are glad to bring Trump in for a roasting. In my opinion, Neither Trump nor Biden will be elected in the next presidential election.
Do either of you watch Biden in speeches?
I would say 69-70. That transition is really where I’ve seen people start to slow cognatively. Now, it’s not fair. I recognize that. There are a number of folks who are sharp well past 70, but the starting age isn’t quite fair either… in comparison to some of the candidates we’ve had, I would say there are some younger people who would be equally as mentally prepared for the job.The cut off should be somewhere around 72.
You are wrong on 35 being unjust, there is wisdom that comes with age. There are younger people who might be qualified in their abilities and faculties, but that is not all that is needed. I was even a little hesitant about Buttigieg running for this reason. He was a little young. I'd be more comfortable with 40. And so would the public, considering the youngest president to win the election was 43.I would say 69-70. That transition is really where I’ve seen people start to slow cognatively. Now, it’s not fair. I recognize that. There are a number of folks who are sharp well past 70, but the starting age isn’t quite fair either… in comparison to some of the candidates we’ve had, I would say there are some younger people who would be equally as mentally prepared for the job.
I would go 35-70 to guarantee the candidate with enough life experience in combination with agile mental faculty and low health risk.
If the press does its job, then age isnt an issue. But, softball questions, scripted answers and restricted access hid a lot of cognitive inability . The press never once openly challenged brandon during the election. They shielded him from everything but scripted controlled exposures.The cut off should be somewhere around 72.
I dislike the use of 'Brandon', but it's as close to appropriate as it's gonna get in this instance.If the press does its job, then age isnt an issue. But, softball questions, scripted answers and restricted access hid a lot of cognitive inability . The press never once openly challenged brandon during the election. They shielded him from everything but scripted controlled exposures.
I think there is wisdom that comes with age for some people, but others never acquire wisdom no matter how old they get. Some acquire more wisdom at earlier ages. if you think there havent been any people wise enough prior to 35 then you would be incorrect.You are wrong on 35 being unjust, there is wisdom that comes with age. There are younger people who might be qualified in their abilities and faculties, but that is not all that is needed. I was even a little hesitant about Buttigieg running for this reason. He was a little young. I'd be more comfortable with 40. And so would the public, considering the youngest president to win the election was 43.
The exact answer I expected out of you, because you are young, and think you know everything. Everybody acquires wisdom, and maturity. It is just a matter of how much they acquire. Some acquire very small amounts and some acquire a lot, but it doesn't seem like it because they were so lacking in rational decisions to start out with. The persons that wrote the Declaration at 33ish, when asked if they were wiser at 45, 55, 65, etc, would most definitely say yes they were.I think there is wisdom that comes with age for some people, but others never acquire wisdom no matter how old they get. Some acquire more wisdom at earlier ages. if you think there havent been any people wise enough prior to 35 then you would be incorrect.
If the person who wrote the Decleration of Independence was 33 at the time, then I would say that 35 is not some magic number anymore than 70 is…. they’re just arbitrary numbers that try to ensure life experience and prevent senility but neither are perfect nor fair.
Of course you gain more wisdom as you age, but that’s not to say that a person of 33 automatically does not have enough wisdom to hold the office. It has nothing to do with your age and much more to do with your experience.The exact answer I expected out of you, because you are young, and think you know everything. Everybody acquires wisdom, and maturity. It is just a matter of how much they acquire. Some acquire very small amounts and some acquire a lot, but it doesn't seem like it because they were so lacking in rational decisions to start out with. The persons that wrote the Declaration at 33ish, when asked if they were wiser at 45, 55, 65, etc, would most definitely say yes they were.
Through arguing this point, because you lack the necessary tools to discuss it, and I don't care go no where with the subject.
"but others never acquire wisdom no matter how old they get.“Of course you gain more wisdom as you age, but that’s not to say that a person of 33 automatically does not have enough wisdom to hold the office. It has nothing to do with your age and much more to do with your experience.
Ok, let me amend that statement for accuracy… some gain wisdom at such a rate that it’s effectively nil. Also, Some gain wisdom but don’t have enough intelligence to apply it."but others never acquire wisdom no matter how old they get.“
The exact answer I expected out of you, because you are young, and think you know everything. Everybody acquires wisdom, and maturity. It is just a matter of how much they acquire. Some acquire very small amounts and some acquire a lot, but it doesn't seem like it because they were so lacking in rational decisions to start out with. The persons that wrote the Declaration at 33ish, when asked if they were wiser at 45, 55, 65, etc, would most definitely say yes they were.
Through arguing this point, because you lack the necessary tools to discuss it, and I don't care go no where with the subject.
You just restated my above post. Going in circles, missed the bolded part though.Ok, let me amend that statement for accuracy… some gain wisdom at such a rate that it’s effectively nil. Also, Some gain wisdom but don’t have enough intelligence to apply it.
It does not matter that one is wiser at 42 than at 36… it matters that they have wisdom enough to do the job when the opportunity to do the job arises. Just because they would be wiser at 42 than 36 does not mean they should have to wait if they have enough wisdom to do it now and they have the intelligence and expertise to succeed already.You just restated my above post. Going in circles, missed the bolded part though.
Not at all a biased source lol.Looks like a SNL sketch. Are we ready to start talking about Kamala ? Probably time
It’s a video not an opinion column. Didn’t assume the source mattered unless the video has been altered. Pulled it from the rivals mb so anything is possibleNot at all a biased source lol.
I agree. It's pretty much a normal curve of quality by age. The edge ages have fewer quality candidates while the middle have more. It doesn't mean that the fringes shouldn't be elected for by any means, but they should be extraordinary candidates to be elected.I like a happy median, not so young that they are inexperienced in the attributes needed for a President, but not so old that they are inexperienced technologically and are current with the times. Fourties are great, fifties can be as good with the right candidate. Thirties are generally too young. President for life is illegal and hopefully stays that way.
I completely disagree. Tech is continuing to evolve at a fast pace. what percentage of the population actually understands crypto currency? Even among millennials it’s a fringe knowledge base. Same thing goes for data analytics and AI. Same thing goes for cloud computing.I don't trust the voter to open them up to people who are 30 and make a wise decision. Rather cut them off from differentiating who holds wisdom & experience beyond their young age. I really don't trust the voter to differentiate who is senile with the media operating as they do. I wouldn't be upset with 40-70. Would rather a few decent candidates in their 30's and 70's be eliminated to put some curbs on an electorate that isn't that competent as a whole in differentiating age issues.
Technology is much better understood by people in their 40's, even better by people in their 30's, and even better by people in their 20's. Those people can much better keep up with the times and learn new technologies as they come available to the public. I doubt the kids that are 20 will ever be in the situation that those people in their 50's and older are, where they are useless in front of a computer/smartphone/tablet/virtual reality/digital printer etc. In the next 30 years tech issues are going to become less and less of a problem.