ADVERTISEMENT

NCAA continues to discuss changes to selection criteria

ctt8410

I.T.S. Head Coach
Gold Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,844
3,866
113
Pomeroy, Sagarin, and Palm all met with the NCAA yesterday to discuss the selection process. They pushed back against pressure from coaches to create one all-inclusive metric and emphasized that selection should continue to be focus on results metrics rather than predictive metrics. These are all good things imo.

My guess is that they revise the team sheets in the near future to better weight road games and they incorporate the predictive metrics more heavily in the seeding process after selection is done.

Article from DeCourcy
 
  • Like
Reactions: cmullinsTU
Pomeroy, Sagarin, and Palm all met with the NCAA yesterday to discuss the selection process. They pushed back against pressure from coaches to create one all-inclusive metric and emphasized that selection should continue to be focus on results metrics rather than predictive metrics. These are all good things imo.

My guess is that they revise the team sheets in the near future to better weight road games and they incorporate the predictive metrics more heavily in the seeding process after selection is done.

Article from DeCourcy

As long as the "eye test" is not a criteria, I am good.
 
As long as the "eye test" is not a criteria, I am good.
Unfortunately, there will always be that and those jackholes those bubble teams that pass the bilas eye test wind up getting their asses waxed early.
 
Anything that gets rid of RPI and uses legitimate and modern metrics like kenpom or Sagarin is a step in the right direction.
 
Teams like Wake Forest need to be punished harder for having a complete trash non-conference schedule.
 
BPI is the one where they don't even tell you how they calculate it right?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT