Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In many (not all to be fair) areas of the country they are all true.Row 1, left. Very true. I assume they are.
Row 1, Right. Too broad of a statement. I'm sure there are places where that is true, partially true, and false. 50 states, 77 counties in Oklahoma probably something like that in many states. Add city PDs.
Row 2. left. Mass protest, true. Civic disruptions depends on if I am hurt and need an ambulance. Or you are very sick and need to get to a doctor.
Row 2 Right. True.
top left - george floyd was killed by a co-worker who is a cop
top right - not true
bottom left - correct to a point
bottom right - libs try to justify this
Most larger cities do require permits, not because they can tell you no, but so they can put the appropriate safety measures in place to protect protesters and counter-protesters. For those who think protests should not cause disruption to the daily lives of those not actively participating in said protests...how do you think the point gets across? How do people protesting injustice get the point across that their lives are disrupted daily (and sometimes permanently) either because they've had a negative encounter or they directly know someone who has? Protests cannot be comfortable or convenient for anyone involved. Now I do not condone the violence and looting that goes on, but as I mentioned in another thread, that is usually a byproduct of the original protest and undertaken by opportunists with no direct skin in the protest itself. Protests can disrupt but they should not destroy.Bottom left is true with the caveat that civil disruptions should be near last resort... where I feel a lot of folks feel they're at.