1. Army
2. Airforce
3. Somiss
4. Col st
Would it detract from the anual army navy game if they were both in the conference?
Yes although creative scheduling could avoid it, that works much better in a fourteen team set up with them in opposing divisions and still requires some negotiation. It is played on a special day and neither Army or Navy wants to give it up.
In order:
1. BYU
2. Army
3. Air Force
Can ride coattails:
Colorado State if two of the three say yes, but one says no.
All are football only adds.
1. Won't come because of pride and the money is pretty even.
2. Hasn't shown an interest in conference again, Navy game issue. Lacks the same length of success run Navy had coming in. Money is better if they keep Army/Navy.
3. Weakest of the three offers, still quite an upgrade from UConn, gets some bonus out of freeing up ooc. Has to find Olympic Sports home. Money would be slightly better as Football only.
4. Coattails on location and facilities, upgrade on UConn, probably not worth it as a stand alone. Money would be slightly better as Football only.
Those considered but discarded.
Boise St: lack the academics, burned bridge and danced in flames, sweet heart deal means they make roughly what they would or a bit more than as Football only, has to find home for Olympic Sports.
SDSU: Too far, probably about to have legal and then state funding problems with "new stadium" they swindled the city out of.
Liberty: Sorry, too controversial, just not a headache the conference presidents want. Yes to some extent BYU has a similar issue.
Since none of those options that are acceptable seem in play, we will stay at eleven. Especially since non-divisional, non-round-robin, keep your championship rule change is seen as very possible.