This. Nolan coached before the field was expanded and during an era when few games were televised. If you think football playoffs are biased now, Oh boy, you weren’t around in the late 70s and early 80s.
Our first five were amongst the best in the country. Teams across the nation were afraid of us. Coaches said they were glad to be playing xyz teams instead of us. Coaches at OU and OSU would get fired for saying that today.
I have started to loathe the tired Nolan narrative that we drag up each year. We sound like aging Minnesota fans struggling to talk about the Rose Bowl teams of the 30’s.
It might be true that Nolan has the same wins. But the opportunities were much fewer and what had to be done to get there is incomparable. Nolan’s talent level in comparison to the rest of Division 1 was equal. We had a couple of guys that would have played at Duke or UNC if given the chance. Haith has infinitely better resources and support and doesn’t have to fight through 130 years of overt racism (though Tulsa still gives Haith a dose from time to time) but has been unable to attract that type of talent - in part due to weaknesses in the system and school beyond his control.
It’s OK to knock Haiti’s wins, but it’s grapes to pumpkins comparing Nolan to Haith.